Association between referral letters and diagnostic errors: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine in Japan.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0197
Sakura Kamiya, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroki Ozawa, Yukinori Harada, Takashi Watari, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai, Yuya Suzuki, Gautam A Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka
{"title":"Association between referral letters and diagnostic errors: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine in Japan.","authors":"Sakura Kamiya, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroki Ozawa, Yukinori Harada, Takashi Watari, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai, Yuya Suzuki, Gautam A Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.

Results: Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).

Conclusions: The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.

转诊信和诊断错误之间的关系:日本普通内科的单中心横断面研究。
目的:转诊文件可能有助于卓越诊断或在诊断错误(DEs)中发挥作用,但其确切影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了转诊记录与DEs之间的关系,这些患者最初是由其他医院或部门评估的,随后转诊到日本一家急症三级医院的普通内科(GIM)门诊。方法:本横断面研究分析了2017年4月1日至2023年3月31日期间到GIM门诊就诊的门诊患者。患者最初在其他医疗机构或部门进行评估,然后前往GIM门诊就诊,随后在GIM门诊就诊后14天内意外再次入院。使用修订后的Safer Dx仪器识别DEs。使用诊断错误评估和研究(DEER)分类法对错误进行分析。结果:80例患者中,29例(36.3% %)经历了DEs, 52例(65.0% %)患者有转诊信。转诊患者的DEs比例低于非转诊患者(25.0比57.1 %;p值=0.004)。在调整了年龄、性别、种族、多病、以前的医生类型和GIM医生的研究生年份后,推荐信的存在与DEs的基本可能性相关(OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p值=0.005)。结论:转诊信的存在有助于准确诊断,同时显着减少DEs。卫生保健系统应考虑促进转诊系统的正确使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信