{"title":"Improving diagnosis in health care: laboratory medicine.","authors":"Giuseppe Lippi, Brian Jackson, Mario Plebani","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate and timely diagnosis remains one of the most complex and challenging processes in medicine. Diagnostic errors pose a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems, with laboratory-related errors playing a substantial role, especially in the pre- and post-analytical phases of the testing process. However, recent innovations have mitigated some key challenges by optimizing workflows and reducing human errors. Notable advancements include automated systems for specimen check-in, preparation, aliquoting and storage for downstream analysis. Technologies such as automated interference detection, alongside sensors monitoring specimen volume and integrity, have enhanced standardization and reliability. Automated sample storage and retrieval systems have improved traceability and retrospective analyses while preserving specimen integrity. In the analytical phase, automation has facilitated real-time anomaly detection, enabling reflex or repeat testing to ensure result accuracy. The multiple integration of different analytical platforms, coupled with automated quality control features, has reduced inter-system variability, minimized manual errors and enhanced efficiency. Advancements in molecular and genetic diagnostics have enabled more precise and personalized treatments, reducing ineffective therapies and side effects. The ongoing deployment of lab-on-a-chip technology, integration of artificial intelligence, and reinforced patient safety culture highlight the vital role of continuous innovation in laboratory medicine to enhance patient safety. However, several challenges remain, including diagnostic errors from test result misinterpretation, poor sample quality, regulatory and compliance constraints, limited data sharing among laboratories, high cost of advanced diagnostic tools and shortage of trained laboratory professionals and pathologists. Addressing these barriers is essential for further safeguarding patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate and timely diagnosis remains one of the most complex and challenging processes in medicine. Diagnostic errors pose a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems, with laboratory-related errors playing a substantial role, especially in the pre- and post-analytical phases of the testing process. However, recent innovations have mitigated some key challenges by optimizing workflows and reducing human errors. Notable advancements include automated systems for specimen check-in, preparation, aliquoting and storage for downstream analysis. Technologies such as automated interference detection, alongside sensors monitoring specimen volume and integrity, have enhanced standardization and reliability. Automated sample storage and retrieval systems have improved traceability and retrospective analyses while preserving specimen integrity. In the analytical phase, automation has facilitated real-time anomaly detection, enabling reflex or repeat testing to ensure result accuracy. The multiple integration of different analytical platforms, coupled with automated quality control features, has reduced inter-system variability, minimized manual errors and enhanced efficiency. Advancements in molecular and genetic diagnostics have enabled more precise and personalized treatments, reducing ineffective therapies and side effects. The ongoing deployment of lab-on-a-chip technology, integration of artificial intelligence, and reinforced patient safety culture highlight the vital role of continuous innovation in laboratory medicine to enhance patient safety. However, several challenges remain, including diagnostic errors from test result misinterpretation, poor sample quality, regulatory and compliance constraints, limited data sharing among laboratories, high cost of advanced diagnostic tools and shortage of trained laboratory professionals and pathologists. Addressing these barriers is essential for further safeguarding patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality. Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error