The Accuracy and Safety of Free-Hand C7 Laminar Screw Fixation: A Clinical Study of 43 Consecutive Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiwon Park, Jin S Yeom, Ho-Joong Kim, Jae-Young Hong, Sang-Min Park
{"title":"The Accuracy and Safety of Free-Hand C7 Laminar Screw Fixation: A Clinical Study of 43 Consecutive Patients.","authors":"Jiwon Park, Jin S Yeom, Ho-Joong Kim, Jae-Young Hong, Sang-Min Park","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>C7 laminar screw is a feasible substitute for C7 pedicle screw with the potential to decrease neurovascular complications and minimize the requirement for intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. Nevertheless, the clinical evidence regarding their accuracy and safety is still limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy and safety of free-hand placement of C7 laminar screw in a series of consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 43 patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation with C7 laminar screw using a free-hand technique. A total of 61 C7 laminar screws and their direction and degree of laminar cortical violation were evaluated for their accuracy and safety by postoperative computed tomography scan. Neurovascular complications were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 61 screws, 14 (23%) penetrated the laminar cortical wall, with 3 dorsal and 11 ventral breaches. Of those 14 screws, 11 screws (18%) experienced a breach of <50% of screw diameter, whereas 3 screws (5%) fell between 50% and 100% breach. No screws resulted in complete cortical violation. There were no instances of neurovascular complications. There was no mechanical complication requiring revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Free-hand C7 laminar screw fixation demonstrated acceptable accuracy and safety. Despite a frequent occurrence of laminar cortical breach (25%) with our free-hand technique, there was no clinically relevant neurovascular or mechanical complications occurred. This technique may offer a feasible option for C7 posterior fixation alternative to pedicle screw, especially in situations where advanced imaging guide is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Background: C7 laminar screw is a feasible substitute for C7 pedicle screw with the potential to decrease neurovascular complications and minimize the requirement for intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. Nevertheless, the clinical evidence regarding their accuracy and safety is still limited.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and safety of free-hand placement of C7 laminar screw in a series of consecutive patients.

Methods: This study included 43 patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation with C7 laminar screw using a free-hand technique. A total of 61 C7 laminar screws and their direction and degree of laminar cortical violation were evaluated for their accuracy and safety by postoperative computed tomography scan. Neurovascular complications were also evaluated.

Results: Out of the 61 screws, 14 (23%) penetrated the laminar cortical wall, with 3 dorsal and 11 ventral breaches. Of those 14 screws, 11 screws (18%) experienced a breach of <50% of screw diameter, whereas 3 screws (5%) fell between 50% and 100% breach. No screws resulted in complete cortical violation. There were no instances of neurovascular complications. There was no mechanical complication requiring revision surgery.

Conclusions: Free-hand C7 laminar screw fixation demonstrated acceptable accuracy and safety. Despite a frequent occurrence of laminar cortical breach (25%) with our free-hand technique, there was no clinically relevant neurovascular or mechanical complications occurred. This technique may offer a feasible option for C7 posterior fixation alternative to pedicle screw, especially in situations where advanced imaging guide is unavailable.

徒手C7椎板螺钉固定的准确性和安全性:43例连续患者的临床研究。
研究设计:回顾性病例系列。背景:C7椎板螺钉是C7椎弓根螺钉的可行替代品,具有减少神经血管并发症和减少术中透视指导需求的潜力。然而,关于其准确性和安全性的临床证据仍然有限。目的:评价徒手置入C7椎板螺钉的准确性和安全性。方法:本研究包括43例采用徒手技术行C7椎板螺钉后路颈椎固定的患者。术后计算机断层扫描评估61枚C7椎板螺钉及其方向和椎板皮质侵犯程度的准确性和安全性。神经血管并发症也进行了评估。结果:61枚螺钉中,14枚(23%)穿透椎板皮质壁,其中3枚为背侧,11枚为腹侧。结论:徒手C7椎板螺钉固定具有良好的准确性和安全性。尽管徒手技术经常发生层状皮质破裂(25%),但没有发生临床相关的神经血管或机械并发症。该技术为C7后路固定提供了替代椎弓根螺钉的可行选择,特别是在没有先进成像引导的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信