Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy for patients after arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1177/02692155251371423
Lihua Huang, Yanhong Ma, Yanmao Wang, Shiyang Yu, Jian Ding, Yifei Yao, Shengdi Lu
{"title":"Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy for patients after arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Lihua Huang, Yanhong Ma, Yanmao Wang, Shiyang Yu, Jian Ding, Yifei Yao, Shengdi Lu","doi":"10.1177/02692155251371423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression therapy after arthroscopic release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingSingle-centre trial conducted in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.ParticipantsA total of 197 patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow release were randomised into intervention (<i>n</i> = 99) and control (<i>n</i> = 98) groups; 176 completed the study (intervention: <i>n</i> = 89, control: <i>n</i> = 87).InterventionThe intervention group received intermittent pneumatic compression therapy (GameReady™) for 2 weeks plus four-week standard rehabilitation; the control group had rehabilitation alone.Main measuresThe primary outcome was improvement in elbow flexion-extension range-of-motion at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included forearm rotation range-of-motion, elbow strength (measured by Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment), and patient-reported outcomes at 4, 12, and 24 weeks.ResultsAt 12 weeks, elbow flexion-extension range-of-motion did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary objective outcomes (forearm rotation and elbow strength) were also similar. However, the Intervention group reported significantly better elbow function at 24 weeks (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score function subscore: 95% confidence intervals: 0.186-1.719; <i>P</i> = 0.015). Pain and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores showed no significant differences between groups.ConclusionsIntermittent pneumatic compression therapy did not significantly improve early elbow mobility or strength following arthroscopic release, but enhanced patient-reported elbow function at longer-term follow-up. Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy may be beneficial as an adjunct to standard rehabilitation. Further studies with larger samples and extended follow-up are needed.Trial registration numberChiCTR2500101221 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.chictr.org.cn/, date of registration: 2025-04-22).</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1340-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251371423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression therapy after arthroscopic release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingSingle-centre trial conducted in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.ParticipantsA total of 197 patients undergoing arthroscopic elbow release were randomised into intervention (n = 99) and control (n = 98) groups; 176 completed the study (intervention: n = 89, control: n = 87).InterventionThe intervention group received intermittent pneumatic compression therapy (GameReady™) for 2 weeks plus four-week standard rehabilitation; the control group had rehabilitation alone.Main measuresThe primary outcome was improvement in elbow flexion-extension range-of-motion at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included forearm rotation range-of-motion, elbow strength (measured by Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment), and patient-reported outcomes at 4, 12, and 24 weeks.ResultsAt 12 weeks, elbow flexion-extension range-of-motion did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary objective outcomes (forearm rotation and elbow strength) were also similar. However, the Intervention group reported significantly better elbow function at 24 weeks (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score function subscore: 95% confidence intervals: 0.186-1.719; P = 0.015). Pain and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores showed no significant differences between groups.ConclusionsIntermittent pneumatic compression therapy did not significantly improve early elbow mobility or strength following arthroscopic release, but enhanced patient-reported elbow function at longer-term follow-up. Intermittent pneumatic compression therapy may be beneficial as an adjunct to standard rehabilitation. Further studies with larger samples and extended follow-up are needed.Trial registration numberChiCTR2500101221 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.chictr.org.cn/, date of registration: 2025-04-22).

关节镜下释放创伤后肘关节僵硬患者的间歇气动压缩治疗:一项随机对照试验。
目的评价关节镜下关节松解后间歇气压压迫治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的疗效。随机对照试验。背景:在中国上海第六人民医院进行的单中心试验。共有197例接受关节镜下肘关节松解术的患者被随机分为干预组(n = 99)和对照组(n = 98);176人完成了研究(干预组:n = 89,对照组:n = 87)。干预组接受间歇气动压缩治疗(GameReady™)2周,外加4周的标准康复治疗;对照组单独进行康复治疗。主要观察指标:12周时肘关节屈伸活动度的改善。次要结果包括前臂旋转活动范围、肘部力量(由巴尔的摩治疗设备测量)和患者报告的4、12和24周的结果。结果12周时,两组患者肘关节屈伸活动度无显著差异。次要客观结果(前臂旋转和肘部力量)也相似。然而,干预组在24周时肘关节功能明显改善(American Shoulder and elbow Surgeons肩部评分功能亚评分:95%可信区间:0.186-1.719;P = 0.015)。手臂、肩部和手部的疼痛和残疾问卷得分在组间无显著差异。结论间歇性气压加压治疗并不能显著改善关节镜释放后早期肘关节的活动能力或力量,但在长期随访中增强了患者报告的肘关节功能。间歇气动压缩治疗作为标准康复的辅助可能是有益的。进一步的研究需要更大的样本和更长的随访时间。试验注册号chictr2500101221(中国临床试验注册中心,https://www.chictr.org.cn/,注册日期:2025-04-22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信