Using Restricted Mean Time Lost to Evaluate the Prognostic Effects on Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Considering Competing Risks.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S521309
Zhaojin Li, Di Liu, Yawen Hou, Zheng Chen
{"title":"Using Restricted Mean Time Lost to Evaluate the Prognostic Effects on Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Considering Competing Risks.","authors":"Zhaojin Li, Di Liu, Yawen Hou, Zheng Chen","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S521309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the presence of competing risks, when the baseline risk is unclear, if only the sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) is reported in the results, which is related to the cumulative incidence function, the survival disparity of events of interest between groups cannot be clarified. In contrast, the difference in restricted mean time lost (RMTLd), which is the difference in the areas under the cumulative incidence between two groups, can well compensate for the deficiencies of SHR and explain the effects on a time scale, facilitating clinical interpretation and communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to collect information on female patients with locally advanced breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. The prognostic factors of breast cancer death were evaluated considering competing risk. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to get SHR and RMTLd.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SHR can indicate the direction of prognostic factors, while RMTLd can quantify prognostic effects and provide time-scale interpretation. For instance, in adjuvant radiotherapy, the SHR showed a protective effect, which can be quantified as an average increase of 4.15 months in survival time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the presence of competing risks, the combined use of absolute measure RMTLd can more intuitively explain the prognostic effect, which is convenient for clinical practice and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"693-705"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S521309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the presence of competing risks, when the baseline risk is unclear, if only the sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) is reported in the results, which is related to the cumulative incidence function, the survival disparity of events of interest between groups cannot be clarified. In contrast, the difference in restricted mean time lost (RMTLd), which is the difference in the areas under the cumulative incidence between two groups, can well compensate for the deficiencies of SHR and explain the effects on a time scale, facilitating clinical interpretation and communication.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to collect information on female patients with locally advanced breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. The prognostic factors of breast cancer death were evaluated considering competing risk. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to get SHR and RMTLd.

Results: SHR can indicate the direction of prognostic factors, while RMTLd can quantify prognostic effects and provide time-scale interpretation. For instance, in adjuvant radiotherapy, the SHR showed a protective effect, which can be quantified as an average increase of 4.15 months in survival time.

Discussion: In the presence of competing risks, the combined use of absolute measure RMTLd can more intuitively explain the prognostic effect, which is convenient for clinical practice and communication.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

考虑竞争风险,使用有限平均时间损失评估局部晚期乳腺癌的预后影响。
背景:在存在竞争风险的情况下,当基线风险不明确时,如果结果中仅报告与累积发生率函数相关的亚分布风险比(SHR),则无法明确组间感兴趣事件的生存差异。相比之下,限制平均时间损失(RMTLd)的差异,即两组之间累积发病率下区域的差异,可以很好地弥补SHR的不足,并在时间尺度上解释其影响,便于临床解释和交流。方法:采用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库收集2010 - 2015年诊断为局部晚期乳腺癌的女性患者信息。考虑竞争风险对乳腺癌死亡的预后因素进行评估。通过单变量分析和多变量分析得到了SHR和RMTLd。结果:SHR可以指示预后因素的方向,RMTLd可以量化预后影响并提供时间尺度解释。例如,在辅助放疗中,SHR显示出保护作用,可以量化为平均增加4.15个月的生存时间。讨论:在存在竞争风险的情况下,联合使用绝对度量RMTLd可以更直观地解释预后效果,便于临床实践和交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology
Clinical Epidemiology Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews. Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews. When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes. The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信