Mohammed Zain Ulabedin Adhoni, Muhammad Haider, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Does miniaturisation improve holmium laser enucleation of prostate outcomes? A meta-analysis of comparative studies.","authors":"Mohammed Zain Ulabedin Adhoni, Muhammad Haider, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a versatile treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), serving as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open/robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Recent advancements have focused on evaluating the impact of smaller (22-24 Fr) vs larger (26-28 Fr) resectoscope sheaths on procedural outcomes.The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety, efficiency, and complication rates associated with smaller and larger resectoscope sheaths in HoLEP procedures through a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Four studies (one RCT and three retrospective) comprising 633 patients (277 with small sheaths [SR] and 356 with large sheaths [LR]) met inclusion criteria. Outcomes assessed included operative time, enucleation/morcellation efficiency, complications (urethral strictures, transient incontinence), and recovery parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of efficiency, no significant differences were observed in operative time, enucleation time, or enucleation efficiency. LR showed faster morcellation time (p = 0.03). As for complications, SR had significantly lower urethral dilation rates (8.0% vs 39.5%, p = 0.01). No significant differences in urethral stricture rates, catheterisation duration, complication rates or transfusion rates. In terms of recovery, similar hospital stay durations and incontinence rates were seen at 3 months postoperatively between groups, and SR might decrease incontinence rates at 1 month postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using smaller resectoscope sheaths in HoLEP reduces urethral dilation rates without compromising procedural efficiency or safety. Larger sheaths had shorter morcellation times. The choice of sheath size should be guided by patient anatomy, surgeon expertise, and procedural requirements. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 2","pages":"151-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a versatile treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), serving as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open/robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Recent advancements have focused on evaluating the impact of smaller (22-24 Fr) vs larger (26-28 Fr) resectoscope sheaths on procedural outcomes.The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety, efficiency, and complication rates associated with smaller and larger resectoscope sheaths in HoLEP procedures through a meta-analysis.
Material and methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Four studies (one RCT and three retrospective) comprising 633 patients (277 with small sheaths [SR] and 356 with large sheaths [LR]) met inclusion criteria. Outcomes assessed included operative time, enucleation/morcellation efficiency, complications (urethral strictures, transient incontinence), and recovery parameters.
Results: In terms of efficiency, no significant differences were observed in operative time, enucleation time, or enucleation efficiency. LR showed faster morcellation time (p = 0.03). As for complications, SR had significantly lower urethral dilation rates (8.0% vs 39.5%, p = 0.01). No significant differences in urethral stricture rates, catheterisation duration, complication rates or transfusion rates. In terms of recovery, similar hospital stay durations and incontinence rates were seen at 3 months postoperatively between groups, and SR might decrease incontinence rates at 1 month postoperatively.
Conclusions: Using smaller resectoscope sheaths in HoLEP reduces urethral dilation rates without compromising procedural efficiency or safety. Larger sheaths had shorter morcellation times. The choice of sheath size should be guided by patient anatomy, surgeon expertise, and procedural requirements. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm long-term outcomes.
简介:钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)是一种治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的通用治疗方法,可作为经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和开放/机器人辅助前列腺切除术的替代方法。最近的进展集中在评估较小(22-24 Fr)和较大(26-28 Fr)切除镜鞘对手术结果的影响。本研究的目的是通过荟荟性分析来评估和比较HoLEP手术中较小和较大切除镜鞘的安全性、有效性和并发症发生率。材料和方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。4项研究(1项随机对照试验和3项回顾性研究)包括633例患者(277例小鞘[SR]和356例大鞘[LR])符合纳入标准。评估的结果包括手术时间、去核/粉碎效率、并发症(尿道狭窄、一过性尿失禁)和恢复参数。结果:两组手术时间、去核时间、去核效率无显著性差异。LR组粉碎时间较对照组快(p = 0.03)。并发症方面,SR组尿道扩张率明显低于前者(8.0% vs 39.5%, p = 0.01)。在尿道狭窄率、置管时间、并发症发生率和输注率方面无显著差异。在恢复方面,两组术后3个月的住院时间和尿失禁率相似,SR可能降低术后1个月的尿失禁率。结论:在不影响手术效率和安全性的前提下,在HoLEP手术中使用较小的切除镜鞘可降低尿道扩张率。较大的鞘有较短的碎裂时间。鞘大小的选择应根据患者解剖结构、外科医生专业知识和手术要求进行指导。需要进一步的大规模随机对照试验来确认长期结果。