Single-J versus double-J stents after ureterorenoscopy for renal stones: A randomized comparison of safety and tolerability.

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.0212
Catarina Laranjo Tinoco, Luis Martins, Francisca Costa, Andreia Cardoso, Ana Sofia Araújo, Mariana Capinha, Luis Pinto, Aparício Coutinho, Carlos Oliveira, Vera Marques, Joao Pimentel Torres, Paulo Mota
{"title":"Single-J versus double-J stents after ureterorenoscopy for renal stones: A randomized comparison of safety and tolerability.","authors":"Catarina Laranjo Tinoco, Luis Martins, Francisca Costa, Andreia Cardoso, Ana Sofia Araújo, Mariana Capinha, Luis Pinto, Aparício Coutinho, Carlos Oliveira, Vera Marques, Joao Pimentel Torres, Paulo Mota","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral stents are generally used after ureterorenoscopy (URS) procedures, even in uncomplicated ones. We aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of single-J (SJ) stents and double-J (DJ) stents in patients submitted to flexible URS for renal stones.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, unblinded, single-center study was conducted between July 2022 and May 2024, involving patients undergoing flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones. Patients were randomized to either SJ stents (removed within 24 hours) or DJ stents (removed 2-4 weeks post-surgery). Primary endpoints included emergency department admissions, postoperative complications, and reintervention rates. Secondary endpoints included stent tolerability and surgery efficacy. A symptom questionnaire was applied at postoperative weeks 1 (W1) and 4 (W4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 125 patients (60 in group SJ and 65 in group DJ), with comparable baseline characteristics. Emergency department admissions were similar (18.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.84), as were complications (18.3% vs 21.5%, p = 0.65) and reintervention rates (1.7% vs 3.1%, p = 1.0). SJ stents showed better tolerability, with lower scores for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and pain at both time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SJ stents placed for less than 24 hours after complete flexible URS are comparable to DJ stents regarding safety and are better tolerated, particularly 4 weeks after the surgery. SJ stents should be prioritized, reducing costs and hospital visits for stent removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 2","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stents are generally used after ureterorenoscopy (URS) procedures, even in uncomplicated ones. We aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of single-J (SJ) stents and double-J (DJ) stents in patients submitted to flexible URS for renal stones.

Material and methods: This prospective, randomized, unblinded, single-center study was conducted between July 2022 and May 2024, involving patients undergoing flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones. Patients were randomized to either SJ stents (removed within 24 hours) or DJ stents (removed 2-4 weeks post-surgery). Primary endpoints included emergency department admissions, postoperative complications, and reintervention rates. Secondary endpoints included stent tolerability and surgery efficacy. A symptom questionnaire was applied at postoperative weeks 1 (W1) and 4 (W4).

Results: We included 125 patients (60 in group SJ and 65 in group DJ), with comparable baseline characteristics. Emergency department admissions were similar (18.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.84), as were complications (18.3% vs 21.5%, p = 0.65) and reintervention rates (1.7% vs 3.1%, p = 1.0). SJ stents showed better tolerability, with lower scores for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and pain at both time points.

Conclusions: SJ stents placed for less than 24 hours after complete flexible URS are comparable to DJ stents regarding safety and are better tolerated, particularly 4 weeks after the surgery. SJ stents should be prioritized, reducing costs and hospital visits for stent removal.

输尿管镜检查肾结石后单j与双j支架:安全性和耐受性的随机比较。
导读:输尿管支架通常在输尿管镜检查(URS)后使用,即使是简单的输尿管镜检查。我们的目的是比较单j (SJ)支架和双j (DJ)支架在肾结石柔性尿路患者中的安全性和耐受性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、随机、非盲、单中心研究于2022年7月至2024年5月进行,研究对象为接受柔性URS联合钬激光碎石治疗肾结石的患者。患者被随机分配到SJ支架(24小时内取出)或DJ支架(术后2-4周取出)。主要终点包括急诊科入院率、术后并发症和再干预率。次要终点包括支架耐受性和手术疗效。术后第1周(W1)和第4周(W4)进行症状问卷调查。结果:我们纳入125例患者(60例在SJ组,65例在DJ组),具有可比的基线特征。急诊科入院率相似(18.3%对16.9%,p = 0.84),并发症相似(18.3%对21.5%,p = 0.65),再干预率相似(1.7%对3.1%,p = 1.0)。SJ支架表现出更好的耐受性,在两个时间点下尿路症状(LUTS)和疼痛评分较低。结论:在完全柔性URS后放置SJ支架少于24小时,其安全性与DJ支架相当,并且耐受性更好,特别是在手术后4周。应该优先使用SJ支架,减少费用和支架移除的住院次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信