Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2025.0011
Benjamin M Mac Curtain, Killian Daly, Gavin Calpin, Eoin Collins, Avinash Deshwal, Olwyn Lynch, Wanyang Qian, Aaron O'Mahony, Hugo C Temperley, Reuben D Mac Curtain, Diarmaid Moran, John A O Kelly, Catherine Dowling
{"title":"Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Benjamin M Mac Curtain, Killian Daly, Gavin Calpin, Eoin Collins, Avinash Deshwal, Olwyn Lynch, Wanyang Qian, Aaron O'Mahony, Hugo C Temperley, Reuben D Mac Curtain, Diarmaid Moran, John A O Kelly, Catherine Dowling","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2025.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed following prostate biopsy. In low-risk and selected favourable intermediate-risk disease, active surveillance is the treatment strategy of choice. In these men, a confirmatory biopsy performed. We report on the rates of risk upgrading at biopsy confirmatory that may represent a need to pursue further treatment in lieu of active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled reclassification rates of men on active surveillance at first confirmatory biopsy, in line with PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central registry for clinical trials were searched until June 2024. Stata was used to pool reclassification rates at first confirmatory biopsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies from 9 countries comprising 6,039 patients were included. Transrectal biopsy was the most common biopsy method for confirmatory biopsy. Weighted pooled rates of upgrading on first confirmatory biopsy were 20% with a 95% confidence interval of 19-21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 20% of men undergoing active surveillance were upgraded at confirmatory biopsy. This may alter the management of these patients, and it highlights the importance of a confirmatory biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 2","pages":"125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed following prostate biopsy. In low-risk and selected favourable intermediate-risk disease, active surveillance is the treatment strategy of choice. In these men, a confirmatory biopsy performed. We report on the rates of risk upgrading at biopsy confirmatory that may represent a need to pursue further treatment in lieu of active surveillance.

Material and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled reclassification rates of men on active surveillance at first confirmatory biopsy, in line with PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central registry for clinical trials were searched until June 2024. Stata was used to pool reclassification rates at first confirmatory biopsy.

Results: Seventeen studies from 9 countries comprising 6,039 patients were included. Transrectal biopsy was the most common biopsy method for confirmatory biopsy. Weighted pooled rates of upgrading on first confirmatory biopsy were 20% with a 95% confidence interval of 19-21%.

Conclusions: Approximately 20% of men undergoing active surveillance were upgraded at confirmatory biopsy. This may alter the management of these patients, and it highlights the importance of a confirmatory biopsy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

主动监测下男性首次确认性前列腺活检对前列腺癌的重新分类:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
前列腺癌通常是在前列腺活检后诊断的。在低风险和选定有利的中等风险疾病中,主动监测是首选的治疗策略。在这些患者中,进行了确证性活检。我们报告了活检确认时的风险升级率,这可能意味着需要进一步治疗而不是主动监测。材料和方法:根据PRISMA的建议,我们对首次确诊活检时接受主动监测的男性进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央临床试验注册中心,直至2024年6月。Stata用于汇总首次确诊活检的再分类率。结果:纳入了来自9个国家的17项研究,共6039例患者。经直肠活检是最常见的确认性活检方法。首次确诊活检的加权合并升级率为20%,95%可信区间为19-21%。结论:大约20%接受主动监测的男性在确认性活检中被升级。这可能会改变这些患者的管理,并强调了确认活检的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信