Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Comparative Study of Low- and High-Volume Hospitals.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1159/000544904
Seher Makineli, Sofie A M Gernaat, Milan C Richir, Wouter B Veldhuis, Liesbeth M Veenendaal, Maaike R Moman, Patrick I Ferdinandus, Menno R Vriens, Paul J van Diest, Wies Maarse, Arjen J Witkamp
{"title":"Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Comparative Study of Low- and High-Volume Hospitals.","authors":"Seher Makineli, Sofie A M Gernaat, Milan C Richir, Wouter B Veldhuis, Liesbeth M Veenendaal, Maaike R Moman, Patrick I Ferdinandus, Menno R Vriens, Paul J van Diest, Wies Maarse, Arjen J Witkamp","doi":"10.1159/000544904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are an important risk factor for local tumor recurrence and the need for re-excision in women with breast cancer. It remains unclear which factors collectively influence positive margins after BCS and whether the outcomes vary among hospitals. This study investigated the occurrence and risk factors of positive margins after BCS in women with breast cancer in two Dutch hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected retrospectively from medical records of women who were diagnosed with newly invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ and underwent primary BCS between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 in two Dutch hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 cases (410 patients) were included, with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range 51-66). On average, the positive margin rate after BCS was 8.0%, which was significantly higher in the low-volume hospital (14.9%) than in the high-volume hospital (5.9%). Invasive lobular carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, confidence interval [CI] = 1.91-12.94), postoperative tumor size (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03-1.11), low hospital volume (OR = 3.90, CI = 1.58-9.66), and lumpectomy size (OR = 0.97, CI = 0.94-1.00) were significantly associated with positive margins after BCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive margin rate after BCS was low, with 8.0% among all cases and varied significantly between the hospitals. Patient-, tumor-, radiological-, and surgery-related factors may contribute to these variations. An optimized collaborative multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care, particularly between radiologists and surgeons, should be strived to achieve improved oncological outcomes in women after BCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"20 4","pages":"238-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are an important risk factor for local tumor recurrence and the need for re-excision in women with breast cancer. It remains unclear which factors collectively influence positive margins after BCS and whether the outcomes vary among hospitals. This study investigated the occurrence and risk factors of positive margins after BCS in women with breast cancer in two Dutch hospitals.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from medical records of women who were diagnosed with newly invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ and underwent primary BCS between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 in two Dutch hospitals.

Results: A total of 423 cases (410 patients) were included, with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range 51-66). On average, the positive margin rate after BCS was 8.0%, which was significantly higher in the low-volume hospital (14.9%) than in the high-volume hospital (5.9%). Invasive lobular carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, confidence interval [CI] = 1.91-12.94), postoperative tumor size (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03-1.11), low hospital volume (OR = 3.90, CI = 1.58-9.66), and lumpectomy size (OR = 0.97, CI = 0.94-1.00) were significantly associated with positive margins after BCS.

Conclusion: Positive margin rate after BCS was low, with 8.0% among all cases and varied significantly between the hospitals. Patient-, tumor-, radiological-, and surgery-related factors may contribute to these variations. An optimized collaborative multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care, particularly between radiologists and surgeons, should be strived to achieve improved oncological outcomes in women after BCS.

影响保乳手术后阳性切缘的临床病理因素:小容量和大容量医院的比较研究
目的:保乳手术(BCS)后切缘阳性是乳腺癌患者局部肿瘤复发和需要再次切除的重要危险因素。目前尚不清楚哪些因素共同影响BCS后的正利润率,以及不同医院的结果是否不同。本研究调查了荷兰两家医院乳腺癌患者BCS后阳性切缘的发生及危险因素。方法:回顾性收集荷兰两家医院2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间诊断为新发浸润性乳腺癌或原位癌并接受原发性BCS的女性病历数据。结果:共纳入423例(410例)患者,中位年龄58岁(四分位数范围51-66)。平均而言,BCS后的阳性边际率为8.0%,小容量医院(14.9%)明显高于大容量医院(5.9%)。浸润性小叶癌(优势比[OR] = 4.97,可信区间[CI] = 1.91 ~ 12.94)、术后肿瘤大小(OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03 ~ 1.11)、低医院容积(OR = 3.90, CI = 1.58 ~ 9.66)和乳房肿瘤切除大小(OR = 0.97, CI = 0.94 ~ 1.00)与BCS术后阳性切缘显著相关。结论:BCS术后阳性切缘率较低,全部病例为8.0%,各医院间差异显著。患者、肿瘤、放射学和手术相关因素可能导致这些变化。一种优化的多学科合作的乳腺癌护理方法,特别是放射科医生和外科医生之间的合作,应该努力实现BCS后妇女肿瘤预后的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信