Patient priorities and decision-making process when choosing between colonic investigation alternatives: a qualitative interview study.

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Campbell MacLeod, Shaun Treweek, Philip Wilson, Angus James Mackintosh Watson, Samantha Robinson
{"title":"Patient priorities and decision-making process when choosing between colonic investigation alternatives: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Campbell MacLeod, Shaun Treweek, Philip Wilson, Angus James Mackintosh Watson, Samantha Robinson","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish patients' perceptions of decision-making and prioritisation of test attributes when considering a colonic investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National Health Service Highland patients on the waiting list for a colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and colonoscopy were invited to undergo a semistructured qualitative telephone interview. A diverse sample was sought using a purposive sampling strategy, aiming for differences in age, gender and test awaited between participants. An interview guide was developed using an iterative approach and published data on patients' experience of colonic investigations. Data were analysed using phenomenological approach and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 12 June 2022 and 02 August 2022, 12 patients underwent telephone interviews. Nine of those patients were on the waiting list for colonoscopy and three were waiting for a CCE. Patients described a mixed level of involvement in the decision-making process for a colonic investigation; some were not involved in the process at all, while others were guided by their clinician. The most important test aspect reported by patients was diagnostic quality, focused on getting a diagnosis, ruling out cancer or the diagnostic accuracy of the test. The importance of the waiting time for the test, the amount of pain or discomfort experienced during the test and the invasiveness of the test were also discussed by patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through qualitative interviews, we have identified patients' priorities for colonic investigations, which should be further explored to quantify the value patients place on these aspects of the test. Areas of improvement in the decision-making process have been reported, which could be addressed to improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05391529.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish patients' perceptions of decision-making and prioritisation of test attributes when considering a colonic investigation.

Methods: National Health Service Highland patients on the waiting list for a colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and colonoscopy were invited to undergo a semistructured qualitative telephone interview. A diverse sample was sought using a purposive sampling strategy, aiming for differences in age, gender and test awaited between participants. An interview guide was developed using an iterative approach and published data on patients' experience of colonic investigations. Data were analysed using phenomenological approach and thematic analysis.

Results: Between 12 June 2022 and 02 August 2022, 12 patients underwent telephone interviews. Nine of those patients were on the waiting list for colonoscopy and three were waiting for a CCE. Patients described a mixed level of involvement in the decision-making process for a colonic investigation; some were not involved in the process at all, while others were guided by their clinician. The most important test aspect reported by patients was diagnostic quality, focused on getting a diagnosis, ruling out cancer or the diagnostic accuracy of the test. The importance of the waiting time for the test, the amount of pain or discomfort experienced during the test and the invasiveness of the test were also discussed by patients.

Conclusion: Through qualitative interviews, we have identified patients' priorities for colonic investigations, which should be further explored to quantify the value patients place on these aspects of the test. Areas of improvement in the decision-making process have been reported, which could be addressed to improve patient care.

Trial registration number: NCT05391529.

患者优先级和决策过程之间结肠调查选择:一项定性访谈研究。
目的:建立患者在考虑结肠检查时对决策和检查属性优先级的看法。方法:采用半结构化定性电话访谈法,对国民健康服务中心(nhs Highland)等待结肠胶囊内窥镜检查(CCE)和结肠镜检查的患者进行访谈。使用有目的的抽样策略寻求多样化的样本,针对参与者之间年龄,性别和等待测试的差异。采用迭代方法制定了访谈指南,并公布了患者结肠调查经验的数据。数据分析采用现象学方法和专题分析。结果:在2022年6月12日至2022年8月2日期间,对12名患者进行了电话访谈。其中9名患者正在等待结肠镜检查,3名患者正在等待CCE。患者描述了参与结肠调查决策过程的不同程度;一些人根本没有参与这个过程,而另一些人则由他们的临床医生指导。患者报告的最重要的测试方面是诊断质量,重点是获得诊断,排除癌症或测试的诊断准确性。患者还讨论了等待测试时间的重要性,测试期间经历的疼痛或不适的程度以及测试的侵入性。结论:通过定性访谈,我们确定了患者对结肠检查的优先级,应进一步探讨以量化患者对这些方面检查的价值。已报告了决策过程中有待改进的领域,这些领域可用于改善病人护理。试验注册号:NCT05391529。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信