Appropriateness of oxycodone use for acute pain in surgical and obstetric departments using a clinical data warehouse.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fabien Xuereb, Kilian Trin, Romain Griffier, Francesco Salvo, Matthieu Frasca, Pernelle Noize, Julien Bezin, Antoine Pariente
{"title":"Appropriateness of oxycodone use for acute pain in surgical and obstetric departments using a clinical data warehouse.","authors":"Fabien Xuereb, Kilian Trin, Romain Griffier, Francesco Salvo, Matthieu Frasca, Pernelle Noize, Julien Bezin, Antoine Pariente","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of oxycodone, recommended as a second-line treatment after morphine, has risen strongly over the last years. Considering its addictive potential, the aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of use of oxycodone for acute pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a university hospital clinical data warehouse and included all patients with at least one administration of oxycodone or morphine in surgery and obstetrics wards in 2022. The population was analysed using automatically collected data, and a random 100-patient sample was analysed through an extensive clinical record review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The appropriate use of oxycodone implies four cumulative conditions which are represented by the primary outcomes carried out on the random 100-patient sample. Firstly, 74% of stays received oxycodone not preceded immediately by morphine: 21% had received oxycodone immediately after morphine, but 44% received oxycodone as first strong opioid and 27% received oxycodone combined with morphine as first opioid treatment, with justification found in less than 5%. Secondly, of the 1035 oxycodone administrations recorded in our sample, 398 (38.5%) were immediate-release forms administered for mild pain or without pain assessment. Thirdly, 28% were not combined with any other analgesic (no multimodal analgesia) and 42% were combined with another opioid. Finally, 60.6% were not combined with a laxative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients treated with oxycodone in surgery had inappropriate prescribing. Considering the known risk of developing opioid use disorder after a first administration in surgery, important educational effort seems needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The use of oxycodone, recommended as a second-line treatment after morphine, has risen strongly over the last years. Considering its addictive potential, the aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of use of oxycodone for acute pain.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a university hospital clinical data warehouse and included all patients with at least one administration of oxycodone or morphine in surgery and obstetrics wards in 2022. The population was analysed using automatically collected data, and a random 100-patient sample was analysed through an extensive clinical record review.

Results: The appropriate use of oxycodone implies four cumulative conditions which are represented by the primary outcomes carried out on the random 100-patient sample. Firstly, 74% of stays received oxycodone not preceded immediately by morphine: 21% had received oxycodone immediately after morphine, but 44% received oxycodone as first strong opioid and 27% received oxycodone combined with morphine as first opioid treatment, with justification found in less than 5%. Secondly, of the 1035 oxycodone administrations recorded in our sample, 398 (38.5%) were immediate-release forms administered for mild pain or without pain assessment. Thirdly, 28% were not combined with any other analgesic (no multimodal analgesia) and 42% were combined with another opioid. Finally, 60.6% were not combined with a laxative.

Conclusions: The majority of patients treated with oxycodone in surgery had inappropriate prescribing. Considering the known risk of developing opioid use disorder after a first administration in surgery, important educational effort seems needed.

使用临床数据仓库对外科和产科急性疼痛使用羟考酮的适宜性。
目的:羟考酮的使用,作为吗啡之后的二线治疗,在过去的几年里有了很大的增长。考虑到羟考酮的成瘾性,本研究的目的是评估使用羟考酮治疗急性疼痛的适宜性。方法:采用一所大学附属医院临床数据仓库进行回顾性横断面研究,纳入2022年在外科和产科病房至少使用过一次羟考酮或吗啡的所有患者。使用自动收集的数据对人群进行分析,并通过广泛的临床记录审查对随机抽取的100例患者样本进行分析。结果:合理使用羟考酮意味着四个累积条件,这些条件由随机100例患者样本的主要结局所代表。首先,74%的患者在接受羟考酮治疗之前没有立即使用吗啡:21%的患者在吗啡后立即接受羟考酮治疗,但44%的患者接受羟考酮作为第一种强阿片类药物治疗,27%的患者接受羟考酮联合吗啡作为第一种阿片类药物治疗,其中不到5%的患者有正当理由。其次,在我们的样本中记录的1035次羟考酮给药中,398次(38.5%)是立即释放形式,用于轻度疼痛或不进行疼痛评估。第三,28%的患者未与其他镇痛药合用(无多模式镇痛),42%的患者与其他阿片类药物合用。最后,60.6%的患者未联合使用泻药。结论:手术中应用羟考酮的患者多数存在处方不当的情况。考虑到在手术中第一次给药后发生阿片类药物使用障碍的已知风险,重要的教育工作似乎是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信