Effectiveness and safety of interventions for fever-associated discomfort in children: A systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Antonio Corsello, Ilaria Alberti, Sara Farhanghi, Alessia Bonetti, Silvia Garattini, Anna Comotti, Paola Marchisio, Elena Chiappini, Gregorio Paolo Milani
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of interventions for fever-associated discomfort in children: A systematic review.","authors":"Antonio Corsello, Ilaria Alberti, Sara Farhanghi, Alessia Bonetti, Silvia Garattini, Anna Comotti, Paola Marchisio, Elena Chiappini, Gregorio Paolo Milani","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Fever is one of the most frequent reasons for paediatric consultations. While traditionally managed by reducing body temperature, recent guidelines emphasize alleviating discomfort as the primary therapeutic goal. Although different interventions have been described to manage fever-associated discomfort in children, their effectiveness and safety has never been systematically analysed. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for managing discomfort in febrile children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420250655721). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 31 January 2025, for studies involving children aged 29 days to 18 years that assessed interventions for fever-associated discomfort. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane and STROBE tools. Results were synthesized narratively and grouped according to the type of intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 observational) involving 1877 children were included. Study designs, including dosage of antipyretics and quality varied across studies. Studies comparing ibuprofen and paracetamol provided conflicting results, while combination therapy (paracetamol + ibuprofen) appeared more effective than using a single drug in -one trial. Tepid sponging, despite reducing temperature, was associated with increased discomfort. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacological treatments appear effective and safe, whereas physical methods offer limited benefit. The available evidence is limited by the small number of studies, methodological heterogeneity, and concerns about risk of bias and outcome measurement inconsistency. New high-quality studies are needed to guide clinical practice for the management of fever-associated discomfort in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Fever is one of the most frequent reasons for paediatric consultations. While traditionally managed by reducing body temperature, recent guidelines emphasize alleviating discomfort as the primary therapeutic goal. Although different interventions have been described to manage fever-associated discomfort in children, their effectiveness and safety has never been systematically analysed. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for managing discomfort in febrile children.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420250655721). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 31 January 2025, for studies involving children aged 29 days to 18 years that assessed interventions for fever-associated discomfort. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane and STROBE tools. Results were synthesized narratively and grouped according to the type of intervention.

Results: Eight studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 observational) involving 1877 children were included. Study designs, including dosage of antipyretics and quality varied across studies. Studies comparing ibuprofen and paracetamol provided conflicting results, while combination therapy (paracetamol + ibuprofen) appeared more effective than using a single drug in -one trial. Tepid sponging, despite reducing temperature, was associated with increased discomfort. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Pharmacological treatments appear effective and safe, whereas physical methods offer limited benefit. The available evidence is limited by the small number of studies, methodological heterogeneity, and concerns about risk of bias and outcome measurement inconsistency. New high-quality studies are needed to guide clinical practice for the management of fever-associated discomfort in children.

儿童发热相关不适干预措施的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述。
目的:发烧是儿科就诊最常见的原因之一。虽然传统的治疗方法是降低体温,但最近的指南强调减轻不适是主要的治疗目标。虽然已经描述了不同的干预措施来管理儿童发烧相关的不适,但从未对其有效性和安全性进行系统分析。本研究的目的是审查的证据有效性和安全性的药物和非药物干预管理不适的发热儿童。方法:按照PRISMA指南(PROSPERO: CRD420250655721)进行系统评价。PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索了截至2025年1月31日的涉及29天至18岁儿童的研究,这些研究评估了对发烧相关不适的干预措施。包括随机对照试验和观察性研究。使用Cochrane和STROBE工具评估偏倚风险。结果综合叙述,按干预方式分组。结果:纳入8项研究(5项随机对照试验,3项观察性试验),涉及1877名儿童。研究设计,包括退烧药的剂量和质量因研究而异。比较布洛芬和扑热息痛的研究提供了相互矛盾的结果,而联合治疗(扑热息痛+布洛芬)似乎比在一次试验中使用单一药物更有效。温热的海绵,尽管降低了温度,但与不适感增加有关。无严重不良事件报告。结论:药物治疗有效且安全,而物理治疗效果有限。可获得的证据受到研究数量少、方法异质性以及对偏倚风险和结果测量不一致的担忧的限制。需要新的高质量研究来指导临床实践,以管理儿童发烧相关不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信