Beyond rigid docking: deep learning approaches for fully flexible protein-ligand interactions.

IF 7.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
John Lee, Canh Hao Nguyen, Hiroshi Mamitsuka
{"title":"Beyond rigid docking: deep learning approaches for fully flexible protein-ligand interactions.","authors":"John Lee, Canh Hao Nguyen, Hiroshi Mamitsuka","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbaf454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sparked by AlphaFold2's groundbreaking success in protein structure prediction, recent years have seen a surge of interest in developing deep learning (DL) models for molecular docking. Molecular docking is a computational approach for predicting how proteins interact with small molecules known as ligands. It has become an essential tool in drug discovery, enabling structure-based virtual screening (VS) methods to efficiently explore vast libraries of drug-like molecules and identify potential therapeutic candidates. However, traditional docking methods primarily rely on search-and-score algorithms, which are computationally demanding. To be viable for VS applications, these methods often sacrifice accuracy for speed by simplifying their search algorithms and scoring functions. Recent advancements in DL have transformed molecular docking, offering accuracy that rivals-or even surpasses-traditional approaches while significantly reducing computational costs. Despite these advancements, DL-based molecular docking still faces major challenges. DL models often struggle to generalize beyond their training data and frequently mispredict key molecular properties, such as stereochemistry, bond lengths, and steric interactions, leading to physically unrealistic predictions. To overcome these limitations, a new generation of models is using DL to incorporate protein flexibility into docking predictions, aiming to more accurately capture the dynamic nature of biomolecular interactions-a long-standing challenge for traditional methods. This review explores how DL has reshaped molecular docking, examines its current shortcomings, and highlights emerging solutions. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to further bridge the gap between computational predictions and real-world molecular interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sparked by AlphaFold2's groundbreaking success in protein structure prediction, recent years have seen a surge of interest in developing deep learning (DL) models for molecular docking. Molecular docking is a computational approach for predicting how proteins interact with small molecules known as ligands. It has become an essential tool in drug discovery, enabling structure-based virtual screening (VS) methods to efficiently explore vast libraries of drug-like molecules and identify potential therapeutic candidates. However, traditional docking methods primarily rely on search-and-score algorithms, which are computationally demanding. To be viable for VS applications, these methods often sacrifice accuracy for speed by simplifying their search algorithms and scoring functions. Recent advancements in DL have transformed molecular docking, offering accuracy that rivals-or even surpasses-traditional approaches while significantly reducing computational costs. Despite these advancements, DL-based molecular docking still faces major challenges. DL models often struggle to generalize beyond their training data and frequently mispredict key molecular properties, such as stereochemistry, bond lengths, and steric interactions, leading to physically unrealistic predictions. To overcome these limitations, a new generation of models is using DL to incorporate protein flexibility into docking predictions, aiming to more accurately capture the dynamic nature of biomolecular interactions-a long-standing challenge for traditional methods. This review explores how DL has reshaped molecular docking, examines its current shortcomings, and highlights emerging solutions. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to further bridge the gap between computational predictions and real-world molecular interactions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超越刚性对接:完全灵活的蛋白质配体相互作用的深度学习方法。
受AlphaFold2在蛋白质结构预测方面取得突破性成功的启发,近年来人们对开发用于分子对接的深度学习(DL)模型产生了浓厚的兴趣。分子对接是一种预测蛋白质如何与被称为配体的小分子相互作用的计算方法。它已成为药物发现的重要工具,使基于结构的虚拟筛选(VS)方法能够有效地探索大量药物样分子文库并确定潜在的治疗候选者。然而,传统的对接方法主要依赖于搜索和评分算法,这对计算量要求很高。为了使VS应用程序可行,这些方法通常通过简化搜索算法和评分函数来牺牲准确性以提高速度。深度学习的最新进展已经改变了分子对接,在显著降低计算成本的同时,提供了与传统方法相媲美甚至超过传统方法的精度。尽管取得了这些进展,但基于dl的分子对接仍然面临着重大挑战。DL模型通常难以推广其训练数据之外的内容,并且经常错误地预测关键的分子性质,例如立体化学、键长和空间相互作用,从而导致物理上不现实的预测。为了克服这些限制,新一代模型正在使用深度学习将蛋白质的灵活性纳入对接预测,旨在更准确地捕捉生物分子相互作用的动态本质——这是传统方法长期面临的挑战。这篇综述探讨了DL如何重塑分子对接,检查其当前的缺点,并强调了新兴的解决方案。最后,我们讨论了未来的机会,进一步弥合计算预测和现实世界分子相互作用之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信