PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.
Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez
{"title":"PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.","authors":"Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed \"PROCC\" to identify likely panitumumab responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score (\"PROCC\"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed "PROCC" to identify likely panitumumab responders.
Methods: The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.
Results: ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score ("PROCC"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.
Conclusions: Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.