PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez
{"title":"PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.","authors":"Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed \"PROCC\" to identify likely panitumumab responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score (\"PROCC\"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed "PROCC" to identify likely panitumumab responders.

Methods: The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.

Results: ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score ("PROCC"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.

Conclusions: Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.

PROCC:一种预测评分,用于识别KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者,这些患者可能从帕尼单抗治疗中获得生存获益。
背景:实践指南推荐帕尼单抗联合化疗治疗KRAS野生型(WT)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者。然而,并不是所有的病人都对这种疗法有反应。我们提出一个称为“PROCC”的评分来识别可能的帕尼单抗反应。方法:训练(TRDS)和验证(VALDS)数据集包括接受帕尼单抗(P)加化疗(TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI)治疗的KRAS WT mCRC患者。TRDS包括36个不同的特征,用于生成通过机器学习(ML)分析的合成表征,以识别与PFS和OS相关的患者亚组。一个多变量逻辑回归模型确定了独立的预测因子,以制定预测评分。结果:ML鉴定出2个TRDS亚群:SP-A (n = 162)和SP-B (n = 298)。与FOLFOX4相比,只有P/FOLFOX4组SP-A患者的OS改善(HR 0.68; P = 0.04)。基线时的CEA、ALP、LDH和血小板用于创建预测评分(PROCC)。TRDS评分曲线下面积为0.81。与FOLFOX4相比,p /FOLFOX4的PROCC≥8.5与较低的进展风险(HR 0.67, p = 0.03)和死亡风险(HR 0.65, p = 0.04)相关。VALDS的验证证实了FOLFIRI的类似结果。结论:基于四个基线参数,PROCC可以指导KRAS WT mCRC患者最有可能从帕尼单抗中获益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信