Long-term oncological outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: 5-year outcomes from the FUGES-012 randomized clinical trial.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Qing Zhong, Dong Wu, Zhi-Yu Liu, Zhi-Xin Shang-Guan, Ze-Ning Huang, Zhi-Quan Zhang, Tao-Yuan Qiu, Jun-Yu Chen, Yi-Ming Jiang, Guang-Tan Lin, Yi-Hui Tang, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jian-Xian Lin, Chao-Hui Zheng, Qi-Yue Chen, Chang-Ming Huang
{"title":"Long-term oncological outcomes of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: 5-year outcomes from the FUGES-012 randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Qing Zhong, Dong Wu, Zhi-Yu Liu, Zhi-Xin Shang-Guan, Ze-Ning Huang, Zhi-Quan Zhang, Tao-Yuan Qiu, Jun-Yu Chen, Yi-Ming Jiang, Guang-Tan Lin, Yi-Hui Tang, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jian-Xian Lin, Chao-Hui Zheng, Qi-Yue Chen, Chang-Ming Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04334-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical use of indocyanine green (ICG) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains at an exploratory stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) and has been reported. Herein, we report the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and related recurrence patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 258 patients (ICG group, 129; non-ICG group, 129) were included in the final per-protocol analysis. The 5-year OS and DFS rate of the ICG group were superior to those of the non-ICG group (all log-rank P < 0.05). After a 5-year follow-up, the ICG group had a considerably lower cumulative recurrence rate (26/129, 20.2%) than the non-ICG group (44/129, 34.1%) (Gray's test P = 0.011), with a risk difference of - 0.140. Stratified by recurrence types, the ICG group exhibited a notably lower cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence in comparison to the non-ICG group (ICG vs. non-ICG: 1.6% vs. 7.8%; risk difference = - 0.062; Gray's test P = 0.019). Dynamic analysis revealed that, in comparison to the ICG group, the non-ICG group had an earlier peak time and higher peak hazard of overall recurrence (ICG vs. non-ICG: peak time: 13.9 vs. 13.1 months; peak hazard: 0.0065 vs. 0.0138). Furthermore, landmark analysis indicated that the early recurrence (within 2 years) rate in the non-ICG group was 26.8%, which was significantly higher than the 13.1% in the ICG group (P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG-guided lymphadenectomy not only significantly improved the 5-year OS and DFS but also noticeably reduced the cumulative incidence of early recurrence. These findings support the routine use of ICG fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03050879.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"497"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04334-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical use of indocyanine green (ICG) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains at an exploratory stage.

Methods: Participants with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) and has been reported. Herein, we report the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and related recurrence patterns.

Results: Total 258 patients (ICG group, 129; non-ICG group, 129) were included in the final per-protocol analysis. The 5-year OS and DFS rate of the ICG group were superior to those of the non-ICG group (all log-rank P < 0.05). After a 5-year follow-up, the ICG group had a considerably lower cumulative recurrence rate (26/129, 20.2%) than the non-ICG group (44/129, 34.1%) (Gray's test P = 0.011), with a risk difference of - 0.140. Stratified by recurrence types, the ICG group exhibited a notably lower cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence in comparison to the non-ICG group (ICG vs. non-ICG: 1.6% vs. 7.8%; risk difference = - 0.062; Gray's test P = 0.019). Dynamic analysis revealed that, in comparison to the ICG group, the non-ICG group had an earlier peak time and higher peak hazard of overall recurrence (ICG vs. non-ICG: peak time: 13.9 vs. 13.1 months; peak hazard: 0.0065 vs. 0.0138). Furthermore, landmark analysis indicated that the early recurrence (within 2 years) rate in the non-ICG group was 26.8%, which was significantly higher than the 13.1% in the ICG group (P = 0.006).

Conclusions: ICG-guided lymphadenectomy not only significantly improved the 5-year OS and DFS but also noticeably reduced the cumulative incidence of early recurrence. These findings support the routine use of ICG fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03050879.

吲哚菁绿荧光成像引导下腹腔镜胃癌淋巴结切除术的长期肿瘤预后:来自FUGES-012随机临床试验的5年预后
背景:吲哚菁绿(ICG)在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的临床应用尚处于探索阶段。方法:可切除胃腺癌患者按1:1的比例随机分配。主要结果是淋巴结(LNs)的数量,已经有报道。在此,我们报告了5年总生存率(OS), 5年无病生存率(DFS)和相关的复发模式。结果:共有258例患者(ICG组129例,非ICG组129例)被纳入最终的方案分析。ICG组的5年OS和DFS率均优于非ICG组(均为log-rank P)。结论:ICG引导下的淋巴结切除术不仅显著提高了5年OS和DFS,而且显著降低了早期复发的累积发生率。这些发现支持在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中常规使用ICG荧光引导下的淋巴结切除术。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03050879。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信