Fecal microbiota transplantation improves bile acid malabsorption in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results of microbiota and metabolites from two cohort studies.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gaochen Lu, Sheng Zhang, Rui Wang, Xia Wu, Yaoyao Chen, Quan Wen, Bota Cui, Faming Zhang, Pan Li
{"title":"Fecal microbiota transplantation improves bile acid malabsorption in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results of microbiota and metabolites from two cohort studies.","authors":"Gaochen Lu, Sheng Zhang, Rui Wang, Xia Wu, Yaoyao Chen, Quan Wen, Bota Cui, Faming Zhang, Pan Li","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04353-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) or bile acid diarrhea (BAD) complicates more than 30% of Crohn's disease (CD), yet no non-invasive biomarker reliably identifies patients who will benefit from fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). We investigated whether serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), a hepatic bile-acid synthesis precursor, can predict BAM and FMT response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 106 pairs of IBD patients treated with FMT from two longitudinal cohorts of prospective trials and 24 matched healthy individuals to identify a multi-omics analysis of microbiota-metabolism and evaluate real-world effectiveness of FMT. Fecal and serum samples before and after FMT along with medical information were collected and detected through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and untargeted liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Mice models were used to preliminarily verify the exacerbation of colitis through administration of primary BAs and treated by FMT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in BAM group tended to achieve sustained higher and stable clinical response (66.67% vs. 49.41%) and remission (52.38% vs. 40.00%) than non-BAM group at 3 months after FMT, along with a significantly decrease of C4 (P < 0.001), improvement of obvious abdominal pain and diarrhea, which was especially obvious in CD patients with ileal resection and ileal /ileocolonic type. Random forest classifiers predicted BAM in IBD patients with 18 or top 4 differential OTUs, showing an area under the curve of 0.92 and 0.83, respectively. Furthermore, results from primary bile acid-induced colitis mice models reinforced these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum C4 and a minimal gut microbiota may identify IBD patients with BAM who are most likely to achieve durable remission after FMT. These translatable biomarkers can guide precision use of microbiota-directed therapy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01790061 and NCT01793831.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"511"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04353-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) or bile acid diarrhea (BAD) complicates more than 30% of Crohn's disease (CD), yet no non-invasive biomarker reliably identifies patients who will benefit from fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). We investigated whether serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), a hepatic bile-acid synthesis precursor, can predict BAM and FMT response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods: We included 106 pairs of IBD patients treated with FMT from two longitudinal cohorts of prospective trials and 24 matched healthy individuals to identify a multi-omics analysis of microbiota-metabolism and evaluate real-world effectiveness of FMT. Fecal and serum samples before and after FMT along with medical information were collected and detected through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and untargeted liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Mice models were used to preliminarily verify the exacerbation of colitis through administration of primary BAs and treated by FMT.

Results: Patients in BAM group tended to achieve sustained higher and stable clinical response (66.67% vs. 49.41%) and remission (52.38% vs. 40.00%) than non-BAM group at 3 months after FMT, along with a significantly decrease of C4 (P < 0.001), improvement of obvious abdominal pain and diarrhea, which was especially obvious in CD patients with ileal resection and ileal /ileocolonic type. Random forest classifiers predicted BAM in IBD patients with 18 or top 4 differential OTUs, showing an area under the curve of 0.92 and 0.83, respectively. Furthermore, results from primary bile acid-induced colitis mice models reinforced these findings.

Conclusions: Serum C4 and a minimal gut microbiota may identify IBD patients with BAM who are most likely to achieve durable remission after FMT. These translatable biomarkers can guide precision use of microbiota-directed therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01790061 and NCT01793831.

粪便微生物群移植改善炎症性肠病患者胆汁酸吸收不良:两项队列研究的微生物群和代谢物结果
背景:胆汁酸吸收不良(BAM)或胆汁酸腹泻(BAD)并发症超过30%的克罗恩病(CD),但没有非侵入性生物标志物可靠地识别将从粪便微生物群移植(FMT)中受益的患者。我们研究了血清7α-羟基-4-胆甾醇-3-酮(C4),一种肝胆汁酸合成前体,是否可以预测炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的BAM和FMT反应。方法:我们从前瞻性试验的两个纵向队列中纳入106对接受FMT治疗的IBD患者和24名匹配的健康个体,以确定微生物代谢的多组学分析并评估FMT的实际有效性。采用16S rRNA扩增子测序和非靶向液相色谱质谱法采集FMT前后的粪便和血清样本,并检测医学信息。采用小鼠模型初步验证原发BAs和FMT对结肠炎的加重作用。结果:与非BAM组相比,BAM组患者在FMT后3个月倾向于获得持续更高和稳定的临床反应(66.67%对49.41%)和缓解(52.38%对40.00%),同时C4显著降低(P结论:血清C4和最小的肠道微生物群可能识别出最有可能在FMT后获得持久缓解的IBD合并BAM患者。这些可翻译的生物标志物可以指导微生物群定向治疗的精确使用。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01790061和NCT01793831。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信