Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global cohort study.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Delin Ma, Pengcheng Wei, Qian Cheng, Jialing Hao, Zuyin Li, Zhuomiaoyu Chen, Wenzai Shi, Zhigao Yuan, Chen Lo, Yongjing Luo, Liyi Qiao, Jie Gao, Jiye Zhu, Zhao Li
{"title":"Immune checkpoint inhibitors use in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global cohort study.","authors":"Delin Ma, Pengcheng Wei, Qian Cheng, Jialing Hao, Zuyin Li, Zhuomiaoyu Chen, Wenzai Shi, Zhigao Yuan, Chen Lo, Yongjing Luo, Liyi Qiao, Jie Gao, Jiye Zhu, Zhao Li","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04352-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major contributor to global cancer mortality, with liver transplantation (LT) offering curative potential for patients in the early stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in managing tumor progression, concerns about graft rejection persist. This study investigates how peri-LT ICIs administration affects rejection rates and survival outcomes in HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This global study analyzed 386 HCC patients receiving Peri-LT ICIs therapy, integrating data from a systematic literature review and institutional registries. The risk of graft rejection and survival outcomes were assessed using logistic and Cox regression, along with restricted cubic splines modeling dose-response dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall graft rejection rates did not significantly differ between Pre-LT (17.5%) and Post-LT (22.1%) ICI users (P = 0.351); however, Post-LT use was associated with higher rates of graft loss/dysfunction (47.1% vs. 25.9%, P < 0.05) and rejection-related mortality (47.1% vs. 18.5%, P < 0.05). In Pre-LT patients, washout periods >30 days (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.72, P = 0.004) and >1.5 half-life counts (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12-0.50, P < 0.001) were associated with reduced rejection risk. Post-LT, high PD-L1 expression on graft tissue correlated with increased rejection risk (P < 0.001). Graft rejection following Pre-LT ICIs was linked to poorer overall survival (HR = 5.17, 95% CI: 2.21-12.24, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With careful management, peri-LT ICIs may be considered for HCC patients. Optimizing washout periods and monitoring graft PD-L1 expression may improve transplant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"515"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04352-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major contributor to global cancer mortality, with liver transplantation (LT) offering curative potential for patients in the early stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in managing tumor progression, concerns about graft rejection persist. This study investigates how peri-LT ICIs administration affects rejection rates and survival outcomes in HCC patients.

Methods: This global study analyzed 386 HCC patients receiving Peri-LT ICIs therapy, integrating data from a systematic literature review and institutional registries. The risk of graft rejection and survival outcomes were assessed using logistic and Cox regression, along with restricted cubic splines modeling dose-response dynamics.

Results: Overall graft rejection rates did not significantly differ between Pre-LT (17.5%) and Post-LT (22.1%) ICI users (P = 0.351); however, Post-LT use was associated with higher rates of graft loss/dysfunction (47.1% vs. 25.9%, P < 0.05) and rejection-related mortality (47.1% vs. 18.5%, P < 0.05). In Pre-LT patients, washout periods >30 days (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.72, P = 0.004) and >1.5 half-life counts (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12-0.50, P < 0.001) were associated with reduced rejection risk. Post-LT, high PD-L1 expression on graft tissue correlated with increased rejection risk (P < 0.001). Graft rejection following Pre-LT ICIs was linked to poorer overall survival (HR = 5.17, 95% CI: 2.21-12.24, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: With careful management, peri-LT ICIs may be considered for HCC patients. Optimizing washout periods and monitoring graft PD-L1 expression may improve transplant outcomes.

免疫检查点抑制剂用于肝移植治疗肝细胞癌:一项全球队列研究
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)仍然是全球癌症死亡率的主要原因,肝移植(LT)为早期患者提供了治疗潜力。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在控制肿瘤进展方面是有效的,但对移植物排斥反应的担忧仍然存在。本研究探讨了肝细胞癌患者肝移植后肝周内给药对排异率和生存结局的影响。方法:这项全球研究分析了386例接受肝细胞癌周围肝移植治疗的HCC患者,整合了来自系统文献综述和机构登记的数据。采用logistic和Cox回归,以及限制性三次样条建模剂量-反应动力学,评估移植排斥风险和生存结果。结果:肝移植前(17.5%)和肝移植后(22.1%)ICI使用者的总体排异率无显著差异(P = 0.351);然而,肝移植后使用与更高的移植物丢失/功能障碍率(47.1%对25.9%,P < 0.05)和排斥相关死亡率(47.1%对18.5%,P < 0.05)相关。在肝移植前患者中,洗脱期> ~ 30天(OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.72, P = 0.004)和> ~ 1.5半衰期(OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 0.50, P < 0.001)与排斥反应风险降低相关。移植后,移植组织中PD-L1的高表达与排斥风险增加相关(P < 0.001)。肝移植前ICIs后的移植排斥反应与较差的总生存率相关(HR = 5.17, 95% CI: 2.21-12.24, P < 0.001)。结论:在精心管理下,肝细胞癌患者可考虑行肝周来肝细胞浸润。优化洗脱期和监测移植物PD-L1表达可能改善移植结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信