The impact of learning disabilities on control, management, and outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK: an observational cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
{"title":"The impact of learning disabilities on control, management, and outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK: an observational cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.","authors":"Archie Wing, Rohini Mathur","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adults with learning disabilities in the UK have a substantially higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than the general population. This study aimed to assess the impact of living with learning disabilities on T2DM control, therapeutic management, vascular outcomes, and mortality in UK primary care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study using primary care electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The study included adults newly diagnosed with T2DM from 2004 to 2021. The exposure was learning disability status at the time of diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare glycemic control at 5 years post-diagnosis between people with and without learning disabilities. Multivariable Cox regression was used to compare time to insulin initiation, macrovascular and microvascular complications, and mortality between people with and without learning disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 280 300 adults with T2DM included in the study, 2074 (0.74%) had a learning disability at T2DM diagnosis. After adjustment, people with learning disabilities had lower odds of poor glycemic control than those without learning disabilities 5 years after diagnosis (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.94) and faster insulin initiation (HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.45) than those without learning disabilities. The risks of all-cause and diabetes-related mortality were doubled in those with learning disabilities (all-cause HR=2.15, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.54; diabetes-related HR=1.93, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.80). We found no difference in the risk of vascular complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with learning disabilities had better glycemic control but shorter time to insulin initiation. This may be related to more frequent diabetes monitoring, or faster advancing T2DM requiring quicker treatment intensification. Despite having similar risks of vascular complications, people with learning disabilities were at higher risk of death. Future research into the mechanisms behind this could help reduce health disparities for people with T2DM and learning disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Adults with learning disabilities in the UK have a substantially higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than the general population. This study aimed to assess the impact of living with learning disabilities on T2DM control, therapeutic management, vascular outcomes, and mortality in UK primary care.
Research design and methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using primary care electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The study included adults newly diagnosed with T2DM from 2004 to 2021. The exposure was learning disability status at the time of diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare glycemic control at 5 years post-diagnosis between people with and without learning disabilities. Multivariable Cox regression was used to compare time to insulin initiation, macrovascular and microvascular complications, and mortality between people with and without learning disabilities.
Results: Of 280 300 adults with T2DM included in the study, 2074 (0.74%) had a learning disability at T2DM diagnosis. After adjustment, people with learning disabilities had lower odds of poor glycemic control than those without learning disabilities 5 years after diagnosis (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.94) and faster insulin initiation (HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.45) than those without learning disabilities. The risks of all-cause and diabetes-related mortality were doubled in those with learning disabilities (all-cause HR=2.15, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.54; diabetes-related HR=1.93, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.80). We found no difference in the risk of vascular complications.
Conclusions: Individuals with learning disabilities had better glycemic control but shorter time to insulin initiation. This may be related to more frequent diabetes monitoring, or faster advancing T2DM requiring quicker treatment intensification. Despite having similar risks of vascular complications, people with learning disabilities were at higher risk of death. Future research into the mechanisms behind this could help reduce health disparities for people with T2DM and learning disabilities.
在英国,有学习障碍的成年人患2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险比一般人群高得多。本研究旨在评估学习障碍对英国初级保健中T2DM控制、治疗管理、血管结局和死亡率的影响。研究设计和方法:我们使用来自英国临床实践研究数据链的初级保健电子健康记录进行了一项观察性队列研究。该研究包括2004年至2021年新诊断为2型糖尿病的成年人。暴露是诊断时的学习障碍状态。采用多变量logistic回归比较有学习障碍和无学习障碍患者诊断后5年的血糖控制情况。采用多变量Cox回归比较学习障碍患者和非学习障碍患者的胰岛素起始时间、大血管和微血管并发症以及死亡率。结果:在280300名成人T2DM患者中,2074名(0.74%)在T2DM诊断时有学习障碍。调整后,在诊断后5年,有学习障碍的人血糖控制不良的几率比没有学习障碍的人低(OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.70至0.94),比没有学习障碍的人胰岛素启动更快(HR=1.20, 95% CI 1.00至1.45)。学习障碍患者的全因死亡率和糖尿病相关死亡率增加了一倍(全因死亡率=2.15,95% CI 1.82 - 2.54;糖尿病相关死亡率=1.93,95% CI 1.32 - 2.80)。我们发现血管并发症的风险没有差异。结论:学习障碍患者血糖控制较好,但胰岛素启动时间较短。这可能与更频繁的糖尿病监测或更快进展的T2DM需要更快的治疗强化有关。尽管患血管并发症的风险相似,但有学习障碍的人死亡的风险更高。未来对其背后机制的研究可能有助于减少2型糖尿病和学习障碍患者的健康差距。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of
high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.