Integrating COVID-19 vaccination into health systems: qualitative findings from seven countries.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cheickna Touré, Marty Makinen, Adriana Almiñana, Grace Chee, Natasha Kanagat, Rebecca Fields, Sakina Kudrati, Laurel Hatt, Leah Hughey Ewald, Audrey Semevo Eunice Amoussou, Roch Houngnihin, Landry Kaucley, Mulugeta Tamire, Israel Mitiku Hatau, Mebratu Massebo Cherinet, Melkamu Ayalew Kokebie, Aschalew Worku Ashagre, Tewodros Alemayehu, Isaac Yeboah, Abraham R Oduro, Manish Jain, Thirumalaichiry Sivaprakasam Selvavinayagam, Vinay Kumar, Deepak Kotebagilu Guddemane, Anil Gupta, Gopal Krishna Soni, Melvin B Moore, Yara Voss De Lima, Betuel Sigauque, Graça Matsinhe, Chinyere Okeke, Adejoke Kolawole
{"title":"Integrating COVID-19 vaccination into health systems: qualitative findings from seven countries.","authors":"Cheickna Touré, Marty Makinen, Adriana Almiñana, Grace Chee, Natasha Kanagat, Rebecca Fields, Sakina Kudrati, Laurel Hatt, Leah Hughey Ewald, Audrey Semevo Eunice Amoussou, Roch Houngnihin, Landry Kaucley, Mulugeta Tamire, Israel Mitiku Hatau, Mebratu Massebo Cherinet, Melkamu Ayalew Kokebie, Aschalew Worku Ashagre, Tewodros Alemayehu, Isaac Yeboah, Abraham R Oduro, Manish Jain, Thirumalaichiry Sivaprakasam Selvavinayagam, Vinay Kumar, Deepak Kotebagilu Guddemane, Anil Gupta, Gopal Krishna Soni, Melvin B Moore, Yara Voss De Lima, Betuel Sigauque, Graça Matsinhe, Chinyere Okeke, Adejoke Kolawole","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In May 2023, when the WHO declared that COVID-19 was no longer a public health emergency of international concern, countries began considering transitioning from the emergency phase to routine provision of COVID-19 vaccination. This paper presents the experience of seven countries with integrating COVID-19 vaccination into other health services and health system functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection took place between August 2023 and April 2024 in Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, India (Tamil Nadu State), Liberia, Mozambique and Nigeria using key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Interviewees included national and subnational representatives from across the Ministry of Health, COVID-19 task forces, civil society organisations and partners. Focus group discussions were conducted with health workers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While demand for vaccination was low at the time of data collection, six of seven countries had started integrating or planned to integrate COVID-19 vaccination with other health services. Relatively high integration was reported for certain health system functions such as supply chain, while others such as information systems were less integrated. The immunisation programme served as lead on integrating COVID-19 vaccination, but coordinating across other health programmes was a major challenge. Nearly all assessment countries relied on external funding for COVID-19 vaccines; none had plans to self-procure COVID-19 vaccines when external funding ends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article highlights challenges such as a lack of cross-programmatic coordination with clear roles and accountability mechanisms, absence of a clear strategy for sustainable procurement of COVID-19 vaccines, infodemics, as well as considerations countries face in transitioning from emergency response to a more routine approach to COVID-19 vaccination. Opportunities exist to focus COVID-19 vaccination integration efforts in a way that sets the stage for a strengthened life course approach to immunisation; lessons for future emergencies include designing for integration earlier to ensure systems and processes built are leveraged postemergency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In May 2023, when the WHO declared that COVID-19 was no longer a public health emergency of international concern, countries began considering transitioning from the emergency phase to routine provision of COVID-19 vaccination. This paper presents the experience of seven countries with integrating COVID-19 vaccination into other health services and health system functions.

Methods: Data collection took place between August 2023 and April 2024 in Benin, Ethiopia, Ghana, India (Tamil Nadu State), Liberia, Mozambique and Nigeria using key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Interviewees included national and subnational representatives from across the Ministry of Health, COVID-19 task forces, civil society organisations and partners. Focus group discussions were conducted with health workers.

Results: While demand for vaccination was low at the time of data collection, six of seven countries had started integrating or planned to integrate COVID-19 vaccination with other health services. Relatively high integration was reported for certain health system functions such as supply chain, while others such as information systems were less integrated. The immunisation programme served as lead on integrating COVID-19 vaccination, but coordinating across other health programmes was a major challenge. Nearly all assessment countries relied on external funding for COVID-19 vaccines; none had plans to self-procure COVID-19 vaccines when external funding ends.

Conclusion: This article highlights challenges such as a lack of cross-programmatic coordination with clear roles and accountability mechanisms, absence of a clear strategy for sustainable procurement of COVID-19 vaccines, infodemics, as well as considerations countries face in transitioning from emergency response to a more routine approach to COVID-19 vaccination. Opportunities exist to focus COVID-19 vaccination integration efforts in a way that sets the stage for a strengthened life course approach to immunisation; lessons for future emergencies include designing for integration earlier to ensure systems and processes built are leveraged postemergency.

将COVID-19疫苗接种纳入卫生系统:来自七个国家的定性调查结果。
2023年5月,世卫组织宣布COVID-19不再是国际关注的突发公共卫生事件,各国开始考虑从紧急阶段过渡到常规提供COVID-19疫苗接种。本文介绍了七个国家将COVID-19疫苗接种纳入其他卫生服务和卫生系统职能的经验。方法:数据收集于2023年8月至2024年4月在贝宁、埃塞俄比亚、加纳、印度(泰米尔纳德邦)、利比里亚、莫桑比克和尼日利亚进行,采用关键线人访谈和焦点小组讨论。受访者包括来自卫生部、COVID-19工作组、民间社会组织和合作伙伴的国家和国家以下各级代表。与卫生工作者进行了焦点小组讨论。结果:虽然在收集数据时疫苗接种需求较低,但7个国家中有6个已开始将COVID-19疫苗接种与其他卫生服务整合或计划整合。据报道,某些卫生系统功能(如供应链)的整合程度相对较高,而其他系统(如信息系统)的整合程度较低。免疫规划在整合COVID-19疫苗接种方面发挥了主导作用,但在其他卫生规划之间进行协调是一项重大挑战。几乎所有评估国家都依赖外部资金购买COVID-19疫苗;没有人计划在外部资金结束后自行采购COVID-19疫苗。结论:本文强调了各种挑战,如缺乏具有明确作用和问责机制的跨规划协调、缺乏可持续采购COVID-19疫苗的明确战略、疫情信息,以及各国在从应急应对向更常规的COVID-19疫苗接种方法过渡时面临的考虑。有机会集中开展COVID-19疫苗接种一体化工作,为加强免疫接种的生命周期方法奠定基础;为未来紧急情况提供的经验教训包括尽早进行整合设计,以确保所建立的系统和流程在紧急情况发生后得到利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信