The relationship between rural residence and cervical cancer screening in three sub-Saharan countries with different national screening policies.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jonas M Ndeke, Molly Rosenberg, Karen E Yeates, Douglas Landsittel
{"title":"The relationship between rural residence and cervical cancer screening in three sub-Saharan countries with different national screening policies.","authors":"Jonas M Ndeke, Molly Rosenberg, Karen E Yeates, Douglas Landsittel","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare cervical cancer screening prevalence between urban and rural women aged 30-49 years in three sub-Saharan African countries chosen by their country-specific screening strategy (Burkina Faso, which has a systematic population-based cervical cancer screening programme in place; Tanzania, where opportunistic screening options only are implemented; and Ghana, which has implemented neither one).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys data from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. We restricted our analysis to women aged 30-49 eligible for cervical cancer screening and categorised them by their place of residence as urban or rural. We calculated screening proportions using country-specific survey weights to estimate the absolute prevalence difference in cervical cancer screening between urban/rural residents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rural participants represented 69.5% in Burkina Faso, 64.6% in Tanzania and 42.8% in Ghana. Burkina Faso women reported higher cervical cancer screening prevalence at 19.9%, and Ghana participants reported the lowest at 7.4%. Compared with urban participants, rural women screened less across countries, with an absolute prevalence difference in screening wider in Tanzania at 13.1% (95% CI 10.6% to 15.7%), followed by Burkina Faso at 11.1% (95% CI 7.7% to 14.6%) and narrower in Ghana at 5.9% (95% CI 4.1% to 7.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a consistently low screening uptake and a screening prevalence gap disfavouring rural women from these three sub-Saharan African countries, with the narrowest urban/rural gap in Ghana and the widest in Tanzania, which has a large opportunistic cervical cancer screening programme. Our findings offer no indication of a potential benefit of having a systematic screening programme as a tool that can mitigate the screening gap between urban and rural populations. Further screening uptake studies, including more countries, are needed on this topic, which should account for the existing country-specific non-screening related factors in the healthcare system that may influence cervical cancer screening uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare cervical cancer screening prevalence between urban and rural women aged 30-49 years in three sub-Saharan African countries chosen by their country-specific screening strategy (Burkina Faso, which has a systematic population-based cervical cancer screening programme in place; Tanzania, where opportunistic screening options only are implemented; and Ghana, which has implemented neither one).

Methods: We used the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys data from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. We restricted our analysis to women aged 30-49 eligible for cervical cancer screening and categorised them by their place of residence as urban or rural. We calculated screening proportions using country-specific survey weights to estimate the absolute prevalence difference in cervical cancer screening between urban/rural residents.

Results: Rural participants represented 69.5% in Burkina Faso, 64.6% in Tanzania and 42.8% in Ghana. Burkina Faso women reported higher cervical cancer screening prevalence at 19.9%, and Ghana participants reported the lowest at 7.4%. Compared with urban participants, rural women screened less across countries, with an absolute prevalence difference in screening wider in Tanzania at 13.1% (95% CI 10.6% to 15.7%), followed by Burkina Faso at 11.1% (95% CI 7.7% to 14.6%) and narrower in Ghana at 5.9% (95% CI 4.1% to 7.7%).

Conclusion: We found a consistently low screening uptake and a screening prevalence gap disfavouring rural women from these three sub-Saharan African countries, with the narrowest urban/rural gap in Ghana and the widest in Tanzania, which has a large opportunistic cervical cancer screening programme. Our findings offer no indication of a potential benefit of having a systematic screening programme as a tool that can mitigate the screening gap between urban and rural populations. Further screening uptake studies, including more countries, are needed on this topic, which should account for the existing country-specific non-screening related factors in the healthcare system that may influence cervical cancer screening uptake.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在三个国家不同的筛查政策下,农村居住与宫颈癌筛查之间的关系。
目的:比较三个撒哈拉以南非洲国家30-49岁城市和农村妇女宫颈癌筛查的流行情况,这些国家是根据其具体国家的筛查战略选择的(布基纳法索有系统的以人口为基础的宫颈癌筛查方案;坦桑尼亚只实施机会性筛查方案;加纳没有实施任何筛查方案)。方法:我们使用了布基纳法索、加纳和坦桑尼亚最新的人口与健康调查数据。我们将分析限制在30-49岁有资格进行子宫颈癌筛查的妇女,并根据她们的居住地将她们分为城市或农村。我们使用国家特定调查权重计算筛查比例,以估计城市/农村居民宫颈癌筛查的绝对患病率差异。结果:农村参与者在布基纳法索占69.5%,坦桑尼亚占64.6%,加纳占42.8%。布基纳法索妇女的宫颈癌筛查率较高,为19.9%,加纳妇女的宫颈癌筛查率最低,为7.4%。与城市参与者相比,各国农村妇女的筛查较少,筛查的绝对流行率差异在坦桑尼亚较大,为13.1% (95% CI 10.6%至15.7%),其次是布基纳法索,为11.1% (95% CI 7.7%至14.6%),加纳较窄,为5.9% (95% CI 4.1%至7.7%)。结论:我们发现这三个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的农村妇女的筛查率和筛查流行率差距一直很低,其中加纳的城乡差距最小,坦桑尼亚的城乡差距最大,因为坦桑尼亚有大量的机会性宫颈癌筛查计划。我们的研究结果没有提供任何迹象表明,将系统性筛查项目作为一种工具,可以缓解城乡人口之间的筛查差距,从而带来潜在的好处。这一主题需要进一步的筛查吸收研究,包括更多的国家,这应该考虑到现有的国家特定的医疗保健系统中可能影响宫颈癌筛查吸收的非筛查相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信