'Knowing how the machine works': a novel framework for engaging with the political determinants of health.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fritz Brugger, Joschka J Proksik, Olga Cambaço, Isaac Lyatuu, Philip Adongo, Martin Amogre Ayanore, Mirko S Winkler
{"title":"'Knowing how the machine works': a novel framework for engaging with the political determinants of health.","authors":"Fritz Brugger, Joschka J Proksik, Olga Cambaço, Isaac Lyatuu, Philip Adongo, Martin Amogre Ayanore, Mirko S Winkler","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well established that <i>social</i> determinants influence people's health and well-being. Yet, limited attention is given to the fact that social determinants are, in turn, the result of <i>political</i> determinants. The political struggle between different ideas, interests and power over public policies, that is, how societies shall function, results in formal and informal structures that work as a 'sorting machine': they determine how societies (re)distribute material resources and opportunities among their members, creating societal classes that face disparate health outcomes. Their visible and measurable characteristics are then labelled 'social determinants'. Improving public health, therefore, needs engaging with the political determinants.We contribute to this broader vision with a process-oriented, interdisciplinary framework. It first operationalises the analysis of political determinants of health to understand how, in a specific public health concern, politics shapes policy processes and causes differential health outcomes. Building on these insights, the framework then supports strategic engagement with the politics of policy processes, using agile methods to identify and promote more equitable and politically feasible policy options.We illustrate our approach by reporting on an interdisciplinary 6-year research project in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania, examining how structural determinants contribute to unequal public health outcomes in industrial mining areas. Trade-offs between attracting mining firms and safeguarding public health have led to a patchwork of national legislation, global governance regimes and voluntary commitments, inviting an eclectic consideration of public health industrial mining. For instance, among over 560 mining projects across Africa, more than 90% of impact assessments were inaccessible. In the few that were, public health is only marginally considered, disproportionately harming vulnerable populations.To strengthen the 'structural competence' and policy relevance of the public health discipline, our results suggest an institutionalised cooperation with political science in curricula, training and applied research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that social determinants influence people's health and well-being. Yet, limited attention is given to the fact that social determinants are, in turn, the result of political determinants. The political struggle between different ideas, interests and power over public policies, that is, how societies shall function, results in formal and informal structures that work as a 'sorting machine': they determine how societies (re)distribute material resources and opportunities among their members, creating societal classes that face disparate health outcomes. Their visible and measurable characteristics are then labelled 'social determinants'. Improving public health, therefore, needs engaging with the political determinants.We contribute to this broader vision with a process-oriented, interdisciplinary framework. It first operationalises the analysis of political determinants of health to understand how, in a specific public health concern, politics shapes policy processes and causes differential health outcomes. Building on these insights, the framework then supports strategic engagement with the politics of policy processes, using agile methods to identify and promote more equitable and politically feasible policy options.We illustrate our approach by reporting on an interdisciplinary 6-year research project in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique and Tanzania, examining how structural determinants contribute to unequal public health outcomes in industrial mining areas. Trade-offs between attracting mining firms and safeguarding public health have led to a patchwork of national legislation, global governance regimes and voluntary commitments, inviting an eclectic consideration of public health industrial mining. For instance, among over 560 mining projects across Africa, more than 90% of impact assessments were inaccessible. In the few that were, public health is only marginally considered, disproportionately harming vulnerable populations.To strengthen the 'structural competence' and policy relevance of the public health discipline, our results suggest an institutionalised cooperation with political science in curricula, training and applied research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“了解机器如何工作”:一个参与健康政治决定因素的新框架。
众所周知,社会决定因素影响人们的健康和福祉。然而,人们很少注意到社会决定因素反过来又是政治决定因素的结果。不同思想、利益和权力之间对公共政策的政治斗争,即社会应如何运作,导致了正式和非正式结构的“分类机器”:它们决定了社会如何在其成员之间(重新)分配物质资源和机会,创造了面临不同健康结果的社会阶层。他们可见的和可测量的特征被标记为“社会决定因素”。因此,改善公共卫生需要与政治决定因素接触。我们通过以过程为导向的跨学科框架为这一更广阔的愿景做出贡献。它首先对健康的政治决定因素进行分析,以了解在特定的公共卫生问题中,政治如何影响政策进程并导致不同的健康结果。在这些见解的基础上,该框架支持与政策过程的政治进行战略接触,使用敏捷方法确定和促进更公平和政治上可行的政策选择。我们通过报告布基纳法索、加纳、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚的一个为期6年的跨学科研究项目来说明我们的方法,该项目研究了结构性决定因素如何导致工业矿区的公共卫生结果不平等。在吸引矿业公司和保护公共卫生之间的权衡导致国家立法、全球治理制度和自愿承诺的拼凑,促使人们对公共卫生工业采矿进行折衷的审议。例如,在非洲560多个采矿项目中,90%以上的影响评估无法获得。在少数几个这样做的国家中,公共卫生只被边缘化,对弱势群体造成了不成比例的伤害。为了加强公共卫生学科的“结构能力”和政策相关性,我们的研究结果建议在课程、培训和应用研究方面与政治学进行制度化的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信