Enhancing patient flow through standardised discharge pathways for neurology and medicine services.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Colin M McCrimmon, Molly R Fensterwald, Linda K Czypinski, Marc R Nuwer, Sherrille E Abelon, Melissa Reider-Demer
{"title":"Enhancing patient flow through standardised discharge pathways for neurology and medicine services.","authors":"Colin M McCrimmon, Molly R Fensterwald, Linda K Czypinski, Marc R Nuwer, Sherrille E Abelon, Melissa Reider-Demer","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Poor discharge planning impairs hospital throughput, adds to the financial strain on health systems and diminishes patient and provider satisfaction. We developed consensus-based discharge criteria coupled with a standardised discharge pathway for four presenting diagnoses and tracked their effect on discharge timing and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical readiness for discharge criteria for patients diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack, seizure, demyelinating disease or syncope were generated by expert consensus at our institution. A standardised discharge pathway was developed for eligible patients based on discussions with stakeholders and staff. Discharge timing and readmissions were tracked for 6 months pre-intervention and 12 months post-intervention (divided into 6 months of implementation and post-implementation periods). The primary outcome was a discharge time of ≤2 hours for 60% of patients during the implementation period. Secondary outcomes included reduced time to discharge (TTD) and LOS compared with the pre-intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>318 total patient visits were included across the baseline, implementation and post-implementation periods. Median TTD improved from 171 min at baseline to 88 and 92 min, respectively, during the implementation and post-implementation periods. Median LOS similarly decreased from 94 hours to 35 and 30 hours, respectively. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved during the implementation period and sustained post-implementation. The rate of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days remained low (~1.5%) post-intervention. Additionally, most providers reported that the intervention improved clinical workflow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This standardised discharge framework improved discharge efficiency for patients with four common diagnoses during an 18-month quality improvement study. The framework and its implementation are highly scalable, and similar systems-level approaches should be considered by hospitals to improve throughput.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Poor discharge planning impairs hospital throughput, adds to the financial strain on health systems and diminishes patient and provider satisfaction. We developed consensus-based discharge criteria coupled with a standardised discharge pathway for four presenting diagnoses and tracked their effect on discharge timing and length of stay (LOS).

Methods: Medical readiness for discharge criteria for patients diagnosed with transient ischaemic attack, seizure, demyelinating disease or syncope were generated by expert consensus at our institution. A standardised discharge pathway was developed for eligible patients based on discussions with stakeholders and staff. Discharge timing and readmissions were tracked for 6 months pre-intervention and 12 months post-intervention (divided into 6 months of implementation and post-implementation periods). The primary outcome was a discharge time of ≤2 hours for 60% of patients during the implementation period. Secondary outcomes included reduced time to discharge (TTD) and LOS compared with the pre-intervention period.

Results: 318 total patient visits were included across the baseline, implementation and post-implementation periods. Median TTD improved from 171 min at baseline to 88 and 92 min, respectively, during the implementation and post-implementation periods. Median LOS similarly decreased from 94 hours to 35 and 30 hours, respectively. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved during the implementation period and sustained post-implementation. The rate of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days remained low (~1.5%) post-intervention. Additionally, most providers reported that the intervention improved clinical workflow.

Conclusions: This standardised discharge framework improved discharge efficiency for patients with four common diagnoses during an 18-month quality improvement study. The framework and its implementation are highly scalable, and similar systems-level approaches should be considered by hospitals to improve throughput.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过神经病学和医学服务的标准化出院途径,加强病人流动。
背景和目的:不良的出院计划损害了医院的吞吐量,增加了卫生系统的财政压力,降低了患者和提供者的满意度。我们制定了基于共识的出院标准,并为四种诊断制定了标准化的出院途径,并追踪了它们对出院时间和住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法:对诊断为短暂性缺血性发作、癫痫发作、脱髓鞘疾病或晕厥的患者,根据专家共识制定出院医疗准备标准。在与利益相关者和工作人员讨论的基础上,为符合条件的患者制定了标准化的出院途径。出院时间和再入院时间分别为干预前6个月和干预后12个月(分为实施期和实施后6个月)。主要结局是60%的患者在实施期间出院时间≤2小时。次要结果包括与干预前相比减少的出院时间(TTD)和LOS。结果:在基线期、实施期和实施后,共纳入318例患者就诊。在实施和实施后期间,中位TTD分别从基线时的171分钟改善到88分钟和92分钟。中位LOS分别从94小时减少到35小时和30小时。所有主要和次要成果均在实施期间和实施后持续实现。干预后30天内急诊就诊率和再入院率仍然很低(~1.5%)。此外,大多数提供者报告说,干预改善了临床工作流程。结论:在为期18个月的质量改善研究中,该标准化出院框架提高了四种常见诊断患者的出院效率。该框架及其实施具有高度可扩展性,医院应考虑采用类似的系统级方法来提高吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信