Real-World Data Included in Post-authorisation Measures: A Case Study of Approved Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the European Union between 2013 and 2024.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Diogo Almeida, Diana Mandslay, Peter G M Mol, Bruno Sepodes, Carla Torre
{"title":"Real-World Data Included in Post-authorisation Measures: A Case Study of Approved Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the European Union between 2013 and 2024.","authors":"Diogo Almeida, Diana Mandslay, Peter G M Mol, Bruno Sepodes, Carla Torre","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00737-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) often require long-term monitoring to assess both safety and efficacy post-authorisation due to uncertainties identified during the approval process. This study aims to characterise the use of real-world data (RWD) in post-authorisation measures (PAMs) for ATMPs approved in the European Union.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic extraction of all PAMs from publicly available European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory documents for ATMPs approved between January 2013 and December 2024 was performed, followed by the identification of the presence and sources of RWD. Additional databases including the HMA-EMA Catalogue of RWD studies and sources and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 25 ATMPs approved by the European Commission over the study period, a total of 118 PAMs were identified, of which 49 (41.5%) involved RWD. Most RWD-PAMs were imposed by the EMA (n = 34; 69.4%), secondary data use was the most referenced data use type (n = 28; 57.1%) and registries were the main source of RWD being mentioned (n = 26; 53.1%). Further, 5 (10.2%) included a comparator group and 13 (32.5%) incorporated patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasises the instrumental role of RWD in the post-authorisation monitoring of ATMPs in the European Union. PAMs reflect the regulatory flexibility for these products, shifting some efforts to the post-authorisation phase to address benefit-risk gaps. Enhancing the use of RWD in this context could improve evidence generation, minimise uncertainties and support more informed regulatory decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00737-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) often require long-term monitoring to assess both safety and efficacy post-authorisation due to uncertainties identified during the approval process. This study aims to characterise the use of real-world data (RWD) in post-authorisation measures (PAMs) for ATMPs approved in the European Union.

Methods: A systematic extraction of all PAMs from publicly available European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory documents for ATMPs approved between January 2013 and December 2024 was performed, followed by the identification of the presence and sources of RWD. Additional databases including the HMA-EMA Catalogue of RWD studies and sources and ClinicalTrials.gov were consulted.

Results: Amongst 25 ATMPs approved by the European Commission over the study period, a total of 118 PAMs were identified, of which 49 (41.5%) involved RWD. Most RWD-PAMs were imposed by the EMA (n = 34; 69.4%), secondary data use was the most referenced data use type (n = 28; 57.1%) and registries were the main source of RWD being mentioned (n = 26; 53.1%). Further, 5 (10.2%) included a comparator group and 13 (32.5%) incorporated patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions: This study emphasises the instrumental role of RWD in the post-authorisation monitoring of ATMPs in the European Union. PAMs reflect the regulatory flexibility for these products, shifting some efforts to the post-authorisation phase to address benefit-risk gaps. Enhancing the use of RWD in this context could improve evidence generation, minimise uncertainties and support more informed regulatory decisions.

批准后措施中包含的真实世界数据:2013年至2024年欧盟批准的先进治疗药物案例研究
背景:由于在批准过程中发现的不确定性,先进治疗药物(atmp)通常需要长期监测以评估批准后的安全性和有效性。本研究旨在描述在欧盟批准的atmp授权后措施(pam)中使用真实世界数据(RWD)的特征。方法:系统提取2013年1月至2024年12月欧洲药品管理局(EMA)公开批准的atmp监管文件中的所有PAMs,然后确定RWD的存在和来源。参考了其他数据库,包括HMA-EMA RWD研究和来源目录和ClinicalTrials.gov。结果:在研究期间,欧盟委员会批准的25种atmp中,共鉴定出118种pam,其中49种(41.5%)涉及RWD。大多数RWD- pms是由EMA实施的(n = 34, 69.4%),二手数据使用是引用最多的数据使用类型(n = 28, 57.1%),注册中心是RWD被提及的主要来源(n = 26, 53.1%)。此外,5例(10.2%)纳入了比较组,13例(32.5%)纳入了患者报告的结果。结论:本研究强调了RWD在欧盟atmp授权后监测中的重要作用。PAMs反映了这些产品的监管灵活性,将一些努力转移到授权后阶段,以解决收益-风险差距。在这种情况下加强RWD的使用可以改善证据的产生,最大限度地减少不确定性,并支持更明智的监管决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioDrugs
BioDrugs 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies. BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease. BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信