Use of suicide prevention helpline services by first-time, frequent, and daily callers: A national cohort study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Annette Erlangsen, Nikolaj Kjær Høier, Agnieszka Storgaard Nielsen, Nicolai Køster Rimvall, Matthew Spittal, Brian Mishara, Merete Nordentoft
{"title":"Use of suicide prevention helpline services by first-time, frequent, and daily callers: A national cohort study.","authors":"Annette Erlangsen, Nikolaj Kjær Høier, Agnieszka Storgaard Nielsen, Nicolai Køster Rimvall, Matthew Spittal, Brian Mishara, Merete Nordentoft","doi":"10.1177/00048674251361753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to examine response rates, types of callers and their probability of being answered, prevalence of at-risk callers, and to calculate national call rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on all calls to the Danish, national telephone helpline for suicide prevention during July 2019 to December 2022 were analysed. A measure of unique calls was developed to account for repeat calls not being answered. We examined the probability of calls being answered by caller types using logistic regression and calculated national call rates for individuals aged ⩾15 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 526,533 calls were made by 31,317 individuals, and 131,621 unique calls were identified, of which 48.9% were answered. First-time callers (95.1%) accounted for 5.7% of calls. We found that 0.1% of callers accounted for 61.8% of all calls. This group of daily callers (>1000 calls each year) consisted of 8-12 unique callers and was more likely to be answered (odds ratio = 24, 95% confidence interval = [23, 25] vs first-time callers), often hung up (49.1% vs first-time callers: 4.4%), and received 33.0% of the total counselling time. The yearly national call and caller rates were 893 calls and 212 unique callers per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correcting for repeated unanswered calls provided an informative estimate of the response rate. The call distribution was highly skewed; a small group of daily callers accounted for most calls and were more likely to be answered. These callers frequently hung up before a conversation was initiated. National call rates facilitate cross-country comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"917-925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251361753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to examine response rates, types of callers and their probability of being answered, prevalence of at-risk callers, and to calculate national call rates.

Methods: Data on all calls to the Danish, national telephone helpline for suicide prevention during July 2019 to December 2022 were analysed. A measure of unique calls was developed to account for repeat calls not being answered. We examined the probability of calls being answered by caller types using logistic regression and calculated national call rates for individuals aged ⩾15 years.

Results: Overall, 526,533 calls were made by 31,317 individuals, and 131,621 unique calls were identified, of which 48.9% were answered. First-time callers (95.1%) accounted for 5.7% of calls. We found that 0.1% of callers accounted for 61.8% of all calls. This group of daily callers (>1000 calls each year) consisted of 8-12 unique callers and was more likely to be answered (odds ratio = 24, 95% confidence interval = [23, 25] vs first-time callers), often hung up (49.1% vs first-time callers: 4.4%), and received 33.0% of the total counselling time. The yearly national call and caller rates were 893 calls and 212 unique callers per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively.

Conclusions: Correcting for repeated unanswered calls provided an informative estimate of the response rate. The call distribution was highly skewed; a small group of daily callers accounted for most calls and were more likely to be answered. These callers frequently hung up before a conversation was initiated. National call rates facilitate cross-country comparisons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

第一次、频繁和每日打电话者使用自杀预防热线服务:一项全国队列研究。
目的:目的是检查应答率、呼叫者类型及其被应答的概率、处于危险中的呼叫者的患病率,并计算全国呼叫率。方法:分析2019年7月至2022年12月期间丹麦国家预防自杀电话热线的所有呼叫数据。开发了一种独特呼叫的测量方法,以解释重复呼叫未被应答的情况。我们使用逻辑回归检查了呼叫者类型接听电话的概率,并计算了年龄大于或等于15岁的个人的全国呼叫率。结果:总体而言,31,317个人拨打了526,533个呼叫,其中131,621个呼叫被识别,其中48.9%被接听。首次来电者(95.1%)占来电总数的5.7%。我们发现0.1%的呼叫者占所有呼叫的61.8%。这组每日来电者(每年1000个电话)由8-12个唯一来电者组成,更有可能被接听(比值比= 24,95%置信区间=[23,25],与首次来电者相比),经常被挂断(49.1%,首次来电者:4.4%),并获得33.0%的总咨询时间。每年的全国电话和来电率分别为每10万居民893个电话和212个独立来电。结论:纠正重复的未应答电话提供了应答率的信息估计。呼叫分布高度偏斜;每天打电话的一小群人占了大部分电话,也更有可能得到回复。这些打电话的人经常在对话开始之前就挂断了电话。国家电话费率便于跨国比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信