Assessing the sensitisation hazard of microbial pesticides: potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to overcome current challenges

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Daniela Morais Leme, Cynthia Bomfim Pestana, Elaine F. Kenny, Sabrina Feustel, Philip Marx-Stoelting, Emanuela Corsini
{"title":"Assessing the sensitisation hazard of microbial pesticides: potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to overcome current challenges","authors":"Daniela Morais Leme,&nbsp;Cynthia Bomfim Pestana,&nbsp;Elaine F. Kenny,&nbsp;Sabrina Feustel,&nbsp;Philip Marx-Stoelting,&nbsp;Emanuela Corsini","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-04149-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past years, the use of chemical pesticides has increased considerably worldwide, and concerns about human health and the environment have stimulated the development of safer alternatives. Biopesticides, including those with microorganisms as active substances, <i>i.e.</i> microbial pesticides, appear to be specific in action, easily sourced without the need for expensive chemicals, and environmentally sustainable with no residual effects. As such, they are seen as a viable alternative to synthetic pesticides. As with any other plant protection product, microbial pesticides are subjected to regulatory approval before marketing, and sensitisation, either via the dermal and/or inhalation routes, is one of the data requirements that have to be addressed in this process. The biological mechanisms underlying potential concerns related to sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides are reviewed in this article. Mechanistic knowledge was utilised to understand the potential limitations of current testing strategies for assessing sensitisation hazards, primarily defined by chemicals, as well as to demonstrate the potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in this process. However, evaluating the sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides requires several protocol adaptations to achieve adequate confidence levels for alternative methods, narrow their applicability domain, and provide potency information on this endpoint. The technical limitations and difficulties in interpreting the results of current testing methods applied to microbial pesticides have long been recognised and are discussed in this article to better drive propositions of NAM-based strategies for microbial pesticides.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":"99 11","pages":"4337 - 4351"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00204-025-04149-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-025-04149-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past years, the use of chemical pesticides has increased considerably worldwide, and concerns about human health and the environment have stimulated the development of safer alternatives. Biopesticides, including those with microorganisms as active substances, i.e. microbial pesticides, appear to be specific in action, easily sourced without the need for expensive chemicals, and environmentally sustainable with no residual effects. As such, they are seen as a viable alternative to synthetic pesticides. As with any other plant protection product, microbial pesticides are subjected to regulatory approval before marketing, and sensitisation, either via the dermal and/or inhalation routes, is one of the data requirements that have to be addressed in this process. The biological mechanisms underlying potential concerns related to sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides are reviewed in this article. Mechanistic knowledge was utilised to understand the potential limitations of current testing strategies for assessing sensitisation hazards, primarily defined by chemicals, as well as to demonstrate the potential value of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in this process. However, evaluating the sensitisation properties of microbial pesticides requires several protocol adaptations to achieve adequate confidence levels for alternative methods, narrow their applicability domain, and provide potency information on this endpoint. The technical limitations and difficulties in interpreting the results of current testing methods applied to microbial pesticides have long been recognised and are discussed in this article to better drive propositions of NAM-based strategies for microbial pesticides.

评估微生物农药的致敏危害:新方法方法(NAMs)克服当前挑战的潜在价值。
在过去几年中,世界范围内化学农药的使用大大增加,对人类健康和环境的关切促使人们开发更安全的替代品。生物农药,包括那些以微生物为活性物质的农药,即微生物农药,似乎具有特异性,易于采购,不需要昂贵的化学品,并且具有环境可持续性,没有残留效应。因此,它们被视为合成农药的可行替代品。与任何其他植物保护产品一样,微生物农药在上市前都要经过监管部门的批准,通过皮肤和/或吸入途径的致敏性是这一过程中必须解决的数据要求之一。本文综述了微生物农药致敏特性潜在问题的生物学机制。利用机械知识来了解当前评估致敏危害(主要由化学品定义)的测试策略的潜在局限性,并证明新方法方法(NAMs)在这一过程中的潜在价值。然而,评估微生物农药的致敏特性需要几个方案调整,以达到替代方法的足够置信度,缩小其适用范围,并提供该终点的效价信息。人们早已认识到目前应用于微生物农药的测试方法在解释结果方面的技术局限性和困难,并在本文中进行了讨论,以更好地推动基于nama的微生物农药策略的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信