Suicidality Among Austrian Farmers: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Disparities Compared to the General Population.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Elke Humer, Afsaneh Gächter, Christoph Pieh, Marina Zeldovich, Viktoria Neubauer
{"title":"Suicidality Among Austrian Farmers: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Disparities Compared to the General Population.","authors":"Elke Humer, Afsaneh Gächter, Christoph Pieh, Marina Zeldovich, Viktoria Neubauer","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2025.2552954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a significant global public health issue, with occupations like farming-marked by financial instability and isolation-facing elevated risks. Despite international evidence, suicidality among Austrian farmers remains unstudied. This study compared suicidal ideation between Austrian farmers (n = 2,006) and the general population (n = 2,007), while identifying sociodemographic, occupational, and behavioral risk factors of suicidality in farmers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected via online surveys (October 2024-February 2025), utilizing the PHQ-9 for suicidal ideation and the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) for suicidality and analyzed with Chi-square tests and logistic regression models adjusted for age and gender disparities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Farmers reported significantly higher suicidal ideation (19.7%) than the general population (14.3%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.62, <i>p</i> < .001), with 1.4 times greater age- and gender- adjusted odds (95% CI:1.17-1.64). Key risk factors for suicidality in farmers included financial distress (very poor vs. very good: aOR = 2.64, <i>p</i> = .008), high agricultural workload (aOR = 1.01/hour, <i>p</i> = .03), and residing in Eastern Austria vs. Western Austria (aOR = 1.76, <i>p</i> = .003). Protective factors included physical activity outside work (aOR = 0.65, <i>p</i> = .005) and living in a relationship (aOR = 0.61, <i>p</i> = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights increased suicidal ideation among farmers compared to the general population. Financial instability, high workload, regional differences, physical activity, as well relationships seem influential. Community-based interventions promoting social support and physical activity may mitigate risks, highlighting the interplay of economic and psychosocial factors in farmer suicidality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2552954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Suicide is a significant global public health issue, with occupations like farming-marked by financial instability and isolation-facing elevated risks. Despite international evidence, suicidality among Austrian farmers remains unstudied. This study compared suicidal ideation between Austrian farmers (n = 2,006) and the general population (n = 2,007), while identifying sociodemographic, occupational, and behavioral risk factors of suicidality in farmers.

Method: Data were collected via online surveys (October 2024-February 2025), utilizing the PHQ-9 for suicidal ideation and the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) for suicidality and analyzed with Chi-square tests and logistic regression models adjusted for age and gender disparities.

Results: Farmers reported significantly higher suicidal ideation (19.7%) than the general population (14.3%; χ2 = 20.62, p < .001), with 1.4 times greater age- and gender- adjusted odds (95% CI:1.17-1.64). Key risk factors for suicidality in farmers included financial distress (very poor vs. very good: aOR = 2.64, p = .008), high agricultural workload (aOR = 1.01/hour, p = .03), and residing in Eastern Austria vs. Western Austria (aOR = 1.76, p = .003). Protective factors included physical activity outside work (aOR = 0.65, p = .005) and living in a relationship (aOR = 0.61, p = .024).

Conclusions: This study highlights increased suicidal ideation among farmers compared to the general population. Financial instability, high workload, regional differences, physical activity, as well relationships seem influential. Community-based interventions promoting social support and physical activity may mitigate risks, highlighting the interplay of economic and psychosocial factors in farmer suicidality.

奥地利农民的自杀率:患病率、危险因素和与一般人群相比的差异。
目的:自杀是一个重大的全球公共卫生问题,像农业这样的职业——以经济不稳定和孤立为特征——面临着更高的风险。尽管有国际证据,奥地利农民的自杀行为仍未得到研究。本研究比较了奥地利农民(n = 2006)和普通人群(n = 2007)的自杀意念,同时确定了农民自杀的社会人口学、职业和行为风险因素。方法:采用在线调查方式(2024年10月- 2025年2月),采用PHQ-9自杀意念问卷和SBQ-R自杀行为问卷进行数据收集,采用卡方检验和logistic回归模型对年龄和性别差异进行校正。结果:农民报告的自杀意念(19.7%)明显高于一般人群(14.3%;χ2 = 20.62, p < .001),年龄和性别调整后的几率是前者的1.4倍(95% CI:1.17-1.64)。农民自杀的主要危险因素包括经济困难(非常差vs非常好:aOR = 2.64, p = 0.008),高农业工作量(aOR = 1.01/小时,p = 0.03),以及居住在奥地利东部vs奥地利西部(aOR = 1.76, p = 0.003)。保护因素包括工作以外的身体活动(aOR = 0.65, p = 0.005)和恋爱生活(aOR = 0.61, p = 0.024)。结论:本研究突出表明,与一般人群相比,农民的自杀意念有所增加。经济不稳定、高工作量、地区差异、体力活动以及人际关系似乎都有影响。以社区为基础的促进社会支持和身体活动的干预措施可能会降低风险,强调经济和社会心理因素在农民自杀中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信