Christian Ratnayake, Mukund Karthik, Leonard Lee, Sascha Karunaratne, Kate Alexander, Michael Solomon, Sophie Hogan, Daniel Steffens
{"title":"Drivers of Research Productivity in Australian Surgical Departments: A Cross-Sectional Multivariable Analysis of a Single Tertiary Centre.","authors":"Christian Ratnayake, Mukund Karthik, Leonard Lee, Sascha Karunaratne, Kate Alexander, Michael Solomon, Sophie Hogan, Daniel Steffens","doi":"10.1111/ans.70314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research productivity is a key indicator of academic and clinical advancement in surgery. While previous studies have identified key drivers of productivity, comprehensive analyses examining the key determinants of research output across multiple Australian surgical departments remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted analysing publicly available data from 16 surgical departments at Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Hospital in December 2024. Data on researcher characteristics, including number of publications, citations, h-index, higher degree by research (HDR) training, academic appointments, and international collaboration, were collated and aggregated for each department. Departmental research productivity was assessed through three primary outcomes: total publication count, aggregate citation count, and median h-index. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed in RStudio to examine associations between these factors and departmental research productivity, measured by publication count, citation count, and median h-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 research members (148 consultants) were included. For publication count, univariate analyses showed significant associations with HDR training (p = 0.016) and academic appointment level (p = 0.048). In the multivariable model, only HDR training remained independently associated with publication count (β = 8.31, 95% CI: 1.77-14.85, p = 0.016, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.347). For h-index, HDR training (p = 0.027), academic appointment level (p = 0.138), international qualification (p = 0.039), and international collaboration (p = 0.044) showed associations in univariate testing. In the multivariable model, both HDR training (β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.030, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.491) and international collaboration (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.00-0.93, p = 0.048, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.491) remained significant. No multivariable models constructed for citations met statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights HDR training as the most consistent predictor of surgical research productivity across multiple metrics across surgical departments in a tertiary Australian hospital. International collaboration emerges as an additional significant driver of research impact, as measured by h-index. These findings provide evidence to support institutional investments in HDR training pathways and international collaborative networks as strategic approaches to enhance research culture and productivity in Australian surgical departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research productivity is a key indicator of academic and clinical advancement in surgery. While previous studies have identified key drivers of productivity, comprehensive analyses examining the key determinants of research output across multiple Australian surgical departments remain limited.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted analysing publicly available data from 16 surgical departments at Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Hospital in December 2024. Data on researcher characteristics, including number of publications, citations, h-index, higher degree by research (HDR) training, academic appointments, and international collaboration, were collated and aggregated for each department. Departmental research productivity was assessed through three primary outcomes: total publication count, aggregate citation count, and median h-index. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed in RStudio to examine associations between these factors and departmental research productivity, measured by publication count, citation count, and median h-index.
Results: A total of 216 research members (148 consultants) were included. For publication count, univariate analyses showed significant associations with HDR training (p = 0.016) and academic appointment level (p = 0.048). In the multivariable model, only HDR training remained independently associated with publication count (β = 8.31, 95% CI: 1.77-14.85, p = 0.016, R2 = 0.347). For h-index, HDR training (p = 0.027), academic appointment level (p = 0.138), international qualification (p = 0.039), and international collaboration (p = 0.044) showed associations in univariate testing. In the multivariable model, both HDR training (β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.030, R2 = 0.491) and international collaboration (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.00-0.93, p = 0.048, R2 = 0.491) remained significant. No multivariable models constructed for citations met statistical significance.
Conclusions: This study highlights HDR training as the most consistent predictor of surgical research productivity across multiple metrics across surgical departments in a tertiary Australian hospital. International collaboration emerges as an additional significant driver of research impact, as measured by h-index. These findings provide evidence to support institutional investments in HDR training pathways and international collaborative networks as strategic approaches to enhance research culture and productivity in Australian surgical departments.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.