Drivers of Research Productivity in Australian Surgical Departments: A Cross-Sectional Multivariable Analysis of a Single Tertiary Centre.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Christian Ratnayake, Mukund Karthik, Leonard Lee, Sascha Karunaratne, Kate Alexander, Michael Solomon, Sophie Hogan, Daniel Steffens
{"title":"Drivers of Research Productivity in Australian Surgical Departments: A Cross-Sectional Multivariable Analysis of a Single Tertiary Centre.","authors":"Christian Ratnayake, Mukund Karthik, Leonard Lee, Sascha Karunaratne, Kate Alexander, Michael Solomon, Sophie Hogan, Daniel Steffens","doi":"10.1111/ans.70314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research productivity is a key indicator of academic and clinical advancement in surgery. While previous studies have identified key drivers of productivity, comprehensive analyses examining the key determinants of research output across multiple Australian surgical departments remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted analysing publicly available data from 16 surgical departments at Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Hospital in December 2024. Data on researcher characteristics, including number of publications, citations, h-index, higher degree by research (HDR) training, academic appointments, and international collaboration, were collated and aggregated for each department. Departmental research productivity was assessed through three primary outcomes: total publication count, aggregate citation count, and median h-index. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed in RStudio to examine associations between these factors and departmental research productivity, measured by publication count, citation count, and median h-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 research members (148 consultants) were included. For publication count, univariate analyses showed significant associations with HDR training (p = 0.016) and academic appointment level (p = 0.048). In the multivariable model, only HDR training remained independently associated with publication count (β = 8.31, 95% CI: 1.77-14.85, p = 0.016, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.347). For h-index, HDR training (p = 0.027), academic appointment level (p = 0.138), international qualification (p = 0.039), and international collaboration (p = 0.044) showed associations in univariate testing. In the multivariable model, both HDR training (β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.030, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.491) and international collaboration (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.00-0.93, p = 0.048, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.491) remained significant. No multivariable models constructed for citations met statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights HDR training as the most consistent predictor of surgical research productivity across multiple metrics across surgical departments in a tertiary Australian hospital. International collaboration emerges as an additional significant driver of research impact, as measured by h-index. These findings provide evidence to support institutional investments in HDR training pathways and international collaborative networks as strategic approaches to enhance research culture and productivity in Australian surgical departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research productivity is a key indicator of academic and clinical advancement in surgery. While previous studies have identified key drivers of productivity, comprehensive analyses examining the key determinants of research output across multiple Australian surgical departments remain limited.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted analysing publicly available data from 16 surgical departments at Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Hospital in December 2024. Data on researcher characteristics, including number of publications, citations, h-index, higher degree by research (HDR) training, academic appointments, and international collaboration, were collated and aggregated for each department. Departmental research productivity was assessed through three primary outcomes: total publication count, aggregate citation count, and median h-index. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed in RStudio to examine associations between these factors and departmental research productivity, measured by publication count, citation count, and median h-index.

Results: A total of 216 research members (148 consultants) were included. For publication count, univariate analyses showed significant associations with HDR training (p = 0.016) and academic appointment level (p = 0.048). In the multivariable model, only HDR training remained independently associated with publication count (β = 8.31, 95% CI: 1.77-14.85, p = 0.016, R2 = 0.347). For h-index, HDR training (p = 0.027), academic appointment level (p = 0.138), international qualification (p = 0.039), and international collaboration (p = 0.044) showed associations in univariate testing. In the multivariable model, both HDR training (β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.030, R2 = 0.491) and international collaboration (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.00-0.93, p = 0.048, R2 = 0.491) remained significant. No multivariable models constructed for citations met statistical significance.

Conclusions: This study highlights HDR training as the most consistent predictor of surgical research productivity across multiple metrics across surgical departments in a tertiary Australian hospital. International collaboration emerges as an additional significant driver of research impact, as measured by h-index. These findings provide evidence to support institutional investments in HDR training pathways and international collaborative networks as strategic approaches to enhance research culture and productivity in Australian surgical departments.

澳大利亚外科部门研究生产力的驱动因素:单一三级中心的横断面多变量分析。
背景:研究生产力是衡量外科学学术和临床进步的重要指标。虽然以前的研究已经确定了生产力的关键驱动因素,但对澳大利亚多个外科部门研究产出的关键决定因素的综合分析仍然有限。方法:对2024年12月皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院16个外科部门的公开数据进行横断面研究。研究人员特征的数据,包括出版物数量、引用、h指数、更高的研究学位(HDR)培训、学术任命和国际合作,对每个部门进行了整理和汇总。通过三个主要结果评估部门研究效率:总发表数、总引用数和h指数中位数。在RStudio中进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以检验这些因素与部门研究生产力之间的关系,通过发表数量、引用数量和中位数h指数来衡量。结果:共纳入研究人员216人(其中咨询人员148人)。对于发表数,单变量分析显示与HDR培训(p = 0.016)和学术任命水平(p = 0.048)显著相关。在多变量模型中,只有HDR训练与发表数独立相关(β = 8.31, 95% CI: 1.77-14.85, p = 0.016, R2 = 0.347)。对于h指数,HDR培训(p = 0.027)、学术任命水平(p = 0.138)、国际资格(p = 0.039)和国际合作(p = 0.044)在单变量检验中显示出相关性。在多变量模型中,HDR训练(β = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.030, R2 = 0.491)和国际合作(β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.00-0.93, p = 0.048, R2 = 0.491)仍然具有显著性。为引文构建的多变量模型均不符合统计学显著性。结论:本研究强调HDR培训是澳大利亚三级医院外科部门多个指标中最一致的外科研究生产力预测指标。根据h指数衡量,国际合作成为研究影响的另一个重要驱动因素。这些发现为支持在HDR培训途径和国际合作网络方面的机构投资提供了证据,作为加强澳大利亚外科部门研究文化和生产力的战略方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信