Prognostic factors and effect modifiers in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who failed at least two lines of therapy: a systematic literature and expert clinical review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Pau Abrisqueta, Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, Ángel Serna, Irene Zamanillo, Yuting Kuang, Jennifer Uyei, Mohsin Shah, Laura Walsh, Eileen Thorley, Krystal Cantos, Emaan Rashidi, Qiufei Ma, Jessica J Jalbert, Alexi N Archambault, Yingxin Xu, Shivani Aggarwal, Srikanth Ambati, Hesham Mohamed, Christian Hampp, Bastian von Tresckow
{"title":"Prognostic factors and effect modifiers in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who failed at least two lines of therapy: a systematic literature and expert clinical review.","authors":"Pau Abrisqueta, Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, Ángel Serna, Irene Zamanillo, Yuting Kuang, Jennifer Uyei, Mohsin Shah, Laura Walsh, Eileen Thorley, Krystal Cantos, Emaan Rashidi, Qiufei Ma, Jessica J Jalbert, Alexi N Archambault, Yingxin Xu, Shivani Aggarwal, Srikanth Ambati, Hesham Mohamed, Christian Hampp, Bastian von Tresckow","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06575-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To enhance the quality of real-world external comparative studies, it is essential to systematically identify, prespecify, and account for prognostic variables and effect measure modifiers (EMMs), especially between emulated target trial and real-world control arms. These factors can then be utilized to evaluate cohort comparability and perform covariate adjustments, such as in propensity score models. A systematic literature review (SLR)-based identification of prognostic factors, coupled with expert clinical review, offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating and ranking the level of evidence, while also assisting in selection of prognostic factors to assess imbalances between cohorts in single-arm trials and real-world data studies. We performed an SLR followed by a clinical review and ranking by subject-matter experts to identify prognostic factors and EMMs in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) who failed at least two lines of therapy (LoTs). Across 13 included studies, the SLR identified 28 prognostic factors that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate. Notably, our review did not identify any statistically significant EMMs. Based on expert ranking of the SLR-derived list, the 5 most important prognostic variables in descending order are: progression of disease within 24 months of first LoT (POD24), chemo-immunorefractory/chemoresistant, refractory to last LoT, number of prior LoTs, and serum lactate dehydrogenase. This comprehensive SLR and expert review highlight critical prognostic factors in r/r FL. The identified prognostic variables can inform future research, emphasizing the need for continued investigation into factors affecting outcomes in this challenging and heterogeneous patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06575-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance the quality of real-world external comparative studies, it is essential to systematically identify, prespecify, and account for prognostic variables and effect measure modifiers (EMMs), especially between emulated target trial and real-world control arms. These factors can then be utilized to evaluate cohort comparability and perform covariate adjustments, such as in propensity score models. A systematic literature review (SLR)-based identification of prognostic factors, coupled with expert clinical review, offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating and ranking the level of evidence, while also assisting in selection of prognostic factors to assess imbalances between cohorts in single-arm trials and real-world data studies. We performed an SLR followed by a clinical review and ranking by subject-matter experts to identify prognostic factors and EMMs in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) who failed at least two lines of therapy (LoTs). Across 13 included studies, the SLR identified 28 prognostic factors that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate. Notably, our review did not identify any statistically significant EMMs. Based on expert ranking of the SLR-derived list, the 5 most important prognostic variables in descending order are: progression of disease within 24 months of first LoT (POD24), chemo-immunorefractory/chemoresistant, refractory to last LoT, number of prior LoTs, and serum lactate dehydrogenase. This comprehensive SLR and expert review highlight critical prognostic factors in r/r FL. The identified prognostic variables can inform future research, emphasizing the need for continued investigation into factors affecting outcomes in this challenging and heterogeneous patient population.

复发或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者至少两线治疗失败的预后因素和影响因素:系统文献和专家临床回顾。
为了提高现实世界外部比较研究的质量,有必要系统地识别、预先指定和解释预后变量和效果测量修饰因子(emm),特别是在模拟目标试验和现实世界对照组之间。然后可以利用这些因素来评估队列可比性并进行协变量调整,例如在倾向评分模型中。基于系统文献综述(SLR)的预后因素识别,结合专家临床评价,提供了一种全面的方法来评估和排序证据水平,同时也有助于选择预后因素来评估单臂试验和现实世界数据研究中队列之间的不平衡。我们对复发或难治性(r/r)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者进行了SLR,随后进行了临床回顾和主题专家的排名,以确定复发或难治性(r/r)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者的预后因素和emm,这些患者至少接受了两条治疗线(LoTs)。在13项纳入的研究中,SLR确定了28个与临床结果显著相关的预后因素,包括总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率。值得注意的是,我们的综述没有发现任何具有统计学意义的emm。根据专家对slr衍生列表的排序,5个最重要的预后变量按降序排列为:第一次LoT后24个月内疾病进展(POD24)、化疗免疫难耐/化疗耐药、对最后一次LoT难耐、之前LoT次数和血清乳酸脱氢酶。这项全面的SLR和专家综述强调了r/r FL的关键预后因素。确定的预后变量可以为未来的研究提供信息,强调需要继续研究影响这一具有挑战性和异质性的患者群体结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信