Efficacy and Safety of S-1 and Oxaliplatin With Radiotherapy for Anorectal Cancer.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Noriko Wada, Naohiro Nishida, Mitsunobu Takeda, Yuki Sekido, Tsuyoshi Hata, Atsushi Hamabe, Takayuki Ogino, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Mamoru Uemura, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Taroh Satoh
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of S-1 and Oxaliplatin With Radiotherapy for Anorectal Cancer.","authors":"Noriko Wada, Naohiro Nishida, Mitsunobu Takeda, Yuki Sekido, Tsuyoshi Hata, Atsushi Hamabe, Takayuki Ogino, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Mamoru Uemura, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Taroh Satoh","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, the optimal regimen remains unknown. For squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC) with radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used; however, alternative medicines are needed for patients unable to receive MMC or those avoiding prolonged infusion. The combination of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) with RT has been explored for rectal and anal cancer, but its efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study retrospectively evaluated SOX + RT outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study analyzed 20 patients with anorectal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma who received SOX + RT at Osaka University Hospital between March 2012 and June 2024. SOX+RT was administered as neoadjuvant or curative treatment. Tumor regression and adverse events were assessed per standard grading criteria. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20 evaluable cases, 14 were adenocarcinomas and 6 were SCCs. Twelve patients received the treatment as neoadjuvant therapy, while eight underwent it with curative intent. The local response rate was 60%, with all SCC cases achieving complete response. R0 resection was achieved in 83%, and anal preservation in 88%. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 39.2%, and overall survival (OS) was 70.6%, with SCC showing better PFS (80.0%) than adenocarcinoma (28.6%). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 50%, but no treatment-related deaths were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SOX + RT was safe and effective, particularly for SCC, suggesting its potential as an alternative when standard therapy is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 9","pages":"3847-3857"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, the optimal regimen remains unknown. For squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC) with radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used; however, alternative medicines are needed for patients unable to receive MMC or those avoiding prolonged infusion. The combination of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) with RT has been explored for rectal and anal cancer, but its efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study retrospectively evaluated SOX + RT outcomes.

Patients and methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 20 patients with anorectal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma who received SOX + RT at Osaka University Hospital between March 2012 and June 2024. SOX+RT was administered as neoadjuvant or curative treatment. Tumor regression and adverse events were assessed per standard grading criteria. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Among 20 evaluable cases, 14 were adenocarcinomas and 6 were SCCs. Twelve patients received the treatment as neoadjuvant therapy, while eight underwent it with curative intent. The local response rate was 60%, with all SCC cases achieving complete response. R0 resection was achieved in 83%, and anal preservation in 88%. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 39.2%, and overall survival (OS) was 70.6%, with SCC showing better PFS (80.0%) than adenocarcinoma (28.6%). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 50%, but no treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusion: SOX + RT was safe and effective, particularly for SCC, suggesting its potential as an alternative when standard therapy is not feasible.

S-1和奥沙利铂联合放疗治疗肛肠癌的疗效和安全性。
背景/目的:新辅助放化疗(CRT)是局部晚期直肠腺癌的标准治疗方案,最佳方案尚不清楚。对于鳞状细胞癌(SCC),常用5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)联合丝裂霉素C (MMC)联合放疗(RT);然而,对于无法接受MMC或避免长时间输注的患者,需要替代药物。S-1和奥沙利铂(SOX)联合RT治疗直肠癌和肛门癌已被探索,但其有效性和安全性仍不确定。本研究回顾性评估了SOX + RT的结果。患者和方法:本单中心回顾性研究分析了2012年3月至2024年6月在大阪大学医院接受SOX + RT治疗的20例肛肠腺癌和鳞状细胞癌患者。SOX+RT作为新辅助或治愈性治疗。肿瘤消退和不良事件按照标准分级标准进行评估。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。结果:20例可评估病例中,腺癌14例,鳞状细胞癌6例。12例患者接受新辅助治疗,8例患者接受治疗目的。局部缓解率为60%,所有SCC病例均达到完全缓解。R0切除率为83%,肛门保留率为88%。3年无进展生存率(PFS)为39.2%,总生存率(OS)为70.6%,其中SCC的PFS(80.0%)优于腺癌(28.6%)。3级不良事件发生率为50%,但无治疗相关死亡报告。结论:SOX + RT是安全有效的,特别是对于SCC,表明其在标准治疗不可行的情况下作为替代方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信