Stratification by PD-L1 TPS in Advanced NSCLC With Low PD-L1 Expression for Optimizing Immunotherapy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Takafumi Fukui, Suya Hori, Yukihisa Hatakeyama, Tatsunori Kiriu, Kanoko Matsumura, Nanako Miwa, Masahiro Katsurada, Keiko Okuno, Sho Yoshimura, Motoko Tachihara
{"title":"Stratification by PD-L1 TPS in Advanced NSCLC With Low PD-L1 Expression for Optimizing Immunotherapy.","authors":"Takafumi Fukui, Suya Hori, Yukihisa Hatakeyama, Tatsunori Kiriu, Kanoko Matsumura, Nanako Miwa, Masahiro Katsurada, Keiko Okuno, Sho Yoshimura, Motoko Tachihara","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the propensity score-matched population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 patients were enrolled; 113 in the single- (81.3%) and 26 in the dual- (18.7%) therapy groups. In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%, after propensity score-matching was performed, the median overall survival was 12.0 months for the single-therapy group, but was not reached for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.022). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.02). In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 21-49%, after propensity score-matching, the median overall survival was not reached for the single-therapy group, but was 9.0 months for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.04), whilst corresponding median progression-free survival was 8.3 and 4.1 months (<i>p</i>=0.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that in patients with NSCLC, the optimal treatment regimen may differ between those with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20% and 21-49%; moreover, nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy may be more effective than chemotherapy with a single-agent ICI for treating advanced NSCLC with ultra-low PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 9","pages":"3859-3875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.

Patients and methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the propensity score-matched population.

Results: A total of 139 patients were enrolled; 113 in the single- (81.3%) and 26 in the dual- (18.7%) therapy groups. In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%, after propensity score-matching was performed, the median overall survival was 12.0 months for the single-therapy group, but was not reached for the dual-therapy group (p=0.022). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively (p=0.02). In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 21-49%, after propensity score-matching, the median overall survival was not reached for the single-therapy group, but was 9.0 months for the dual-therapy group (p=0.04), whilst corresponding median progression-free survival was 8.3 and 4.1 months (p=0.087).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that in patients with NSCLC, the optimal treatment regimen may differ between those with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20% and 21-49%; moreover, nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy may be more effective than chemotherapy with a single-agent ICI for treating advanced NSCLC with ultra-low PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%.

PD-L1 TPS分层在PD-L1低表达的晚期NSCLC中优化免疫治疗
背景:程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分(TPS)为1-49%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。PD-L1 TPS进一步分层可能导致治疗的优化。患者和方法:我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究,比较纳武单抗和伊匹单抗加/不加化疗(双治疗组)和单药免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)化疗(单治疗组)作为晚期NSCLC的一线治疗,PD-L1 TPS为1-49%。主要终点是倾向评分匹配人群的总生存率。结果:共纳入139例患者;单药组113例(81.3%),双药组26例(18.7%)。在PD-L1 TPS为1-20%的人群中,进行倾向评分匹配后,单治疗组的中位总生存期为12.0个月,而双治疗组未达到中位总生存期(p=0.022)。中位无进展生存期分别为6.9个月和11.5个月(p=0.02)。在PD-L1 TPS为21-49%的人群中,经倾向评分匹配后,单治疗组的中位总生存期未达到,而双治疗组的中位总生存期为9.0个月(p=0.04),相应的中位无进展生存期为8.3个月和4.1个月(p=0.087)。结论:本研究结果提示,在非小细胞肺癌患者中,PD-L1 TPS为1-20%和21-49%的患者的最佳治疗方案可能存在差异;此外,对于PD-L1超低表达的晚期NSCLC,特别是PD-L1 TPS为1-20%的晚期NSCLC,以纳武单抗和伊匹单抗为基础的治疗可能比单药ICI化疗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信