Antimicrobial susceptibility of Legionella gormanii: species-specific ECOFFs, distinct MICs for rifampin versus Legionella pneumophila.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Jun-Wei Xu, Yuan-Tong He, Xiao-Yong Zhan
{"title":"Antimicrobial susceptibility of Legionella gormanii: species-specific ECOFFs, distinct MICs for rifampin versus Legionella pneumophila.","authors":"Jun-Wei Xu, Yuan-Tong He, Xiao-Yong Zhan","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00813-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Legionella gormanii (L. gormanii) is an emerging pathogen causing legionellosis, yet it is much less studied than the predominant species, L. pneumophila. Clinical treatment guidelines for legionellosis are primarily based on data from L. pneumophila and recommend macrolides and fluoroquinolones. However, the intrinsic antimicrobial susceptibility of L. gormanii is not well-defined, creating uncertainty about whether these guidelines are directly applicable. Establishing a baseline understanding of its susceptibility patterns is a prerequisite for effective epidemiological surveillance and for identifying non-wild-type resistance. This study aims to address this fundamental knowledge gap by characterizing the in vitro susceptibility profiles of a large collection of environmental L. gormanii isolates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically evaluated the in vitro activity of ten representative antimicrobials against 207 environmental L. gormanii isolates collected in China between 2019 and 2021. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the broth microdilution (BMD) method, and species-specific epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were established using the ECOFFinder tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most tested agents demonstrated good in vitro activity. Rifampin was the most potent agent, while clarithromycin was the most active macrolide. Conversely, tetracyclines showed limited activity. Comparative analysis revealed that L. gormanii exhibited markedly higher MICs for rifampin (approximately 9.58-fold) than typically reported for L. pneumophila. Species-specific ECOFFs were determined for nine antimicrobials: rifampin (0.016 mg/L); ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin (0.063 mg/L); moxifloxacin (0.125 mg/L); erythromycin (0.25 mg/L); azithromycin (0.5 mg/L); trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (4 mg/L); and tigecycline (16 mg/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes the first large-scale susceptibility dataset and species-specific ECOFFs for L. gormanii. The findings highlight key inter-species differences in susceptibility, particularly for rifampin, underscoring that treatment paradigms cannot be safely extrapolated from L. pneumophila. These ECOFFs provide a critical tool for surveillance of non-wild-type resistance. However, these data, derived from environmental isolates, are intended for epidemiological and hypothesis-generating purposes and must be supplemented with clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies before informing changes to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00813-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Legionella gormanii (L. gormanii) is an emerging pathogen causing legionellosis, yet it is much less studied than the predominant species, L. pneumophila. Clinical treatment guidelines for legionellosis are primarily based on data from L. pneumophila and recommend macrolides and fluoroquinolones. However, the intrinsic antimicrobial susceptibility of L. gormanii is not well-defined, creating uncertainty about whether these guidelines are directly applicable. Establishing a baseline understanding of its susceptibility patterns is a prerequisite for effective epidemiological surveillance and for identifying non-wild-type resistance. This study aims to address this fundamental knowledge gap by characterizing the in vitro susceptibility profiles of a large collection of environmental L. gormanii isolates.

Methods: This study systematically evaluated the in vitro activity of ten representative antimicrobials against 207 environmental L. gormanii isolates collected in China between 2019 and 2021. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the broth microdilution (BMD) method, and species-specific epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were established using the ECOFFinder tool.

Results: Most tested agents demonstrated good in vitro activity. Rifampin was the most potent agent, while clarithromycin was the most active macrolide. Conversely, tetracyclines showed limited activity. Comparative analysis revealed that L. gormanii exhibited markedly higher MICs for rifampin (approximately 9.58-fold) than typically reported for L. pneumophila. Species-specific ECOFFs were determined for nine antimicrobials: rifampin (0.016 mg/L); ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin (0.063 mg/L); moxifloxacin (0.125 mg/L); erythromycin (0.25 mg/L); azithromycin (0.5 mg/L); trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (4 mg/L); and tigecycline (16 mg/L).

Conclusions: This study establishes the first large-scale susceptibility dataset and species-specific ECOFFs for L. gormanii. The findings highlight key inter-species differences in susceptibility, particularly for rifampin, underscoring that treatment paradigms cannot be safely extrapolated from L. pneumophila. These ECOFFs provide a critical tool for surveillance of non-wild-type resistance. However, these data, derived from environmental isolates, are intended for epidemiological and hypothesis-generating purposes and must be supplemented with clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies before informing changes to clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哥尔曼军团菌的抗菌敏感性:种特异性ecoff,利福平与嗜肺军团菌的不同mic。
背景:哥尔曼军团菌(L. gormanii)是一种引起军团菌病的新兴病原体,但与优势种嗜肺军团菌相比,对其的研究要少得多。军团菌病的临床治疗指南主要基于嗜肺乳杆菌的数据,并推荐大环内酯类药物和氟喹诺酮类药物。然而,弓形杆菌的内在抗菌敏感性并没有明确定义,这就造成了这些指南是否直接适用的不确定性。建立对其易感性模式的基本认识是进行有效流行病学监测和确定非野生型耐药性的先决条件。本研究旨在通过描述大量环境菌株的体外敏感性特征来解决这一基本知识差距。方法:系统评价10种具有代表性的抗菌药物对2019 - 2021年在中国采集的207株环境型戈氏乳杆菌的体外活性。采用微量肉汤稀释法(BMD)测定最低抑菌浓度(mic),采用ECOFFinder工具确定物种特异性流行病学临界值(ecoff)。结果:大多数被试药物具有良好的体外活性。利福平是最有效的药物,克拉霉素是最有效的大环内酯。相反,四环素类药物的活性有限。比较分析显示,与一般报道的嗜肺乳杆菌相比,gormanii对利福平的mic明显更高(约为9.58倍)。测定了9种抗菌素的ecoff:利福平(0.016 mg/L);环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、克拉霉素(0.063 mg/L);莫西沙星(0.125 mg/L);红霉素(0.25 mg/L);阿奇霉素(0.5 mg/L);甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(4mg /L);替加环素(16mg /L)。结论:本研究建立了第一个大规模的鼠耳弓形虫敏感性数据集和物种特异性ecoff。研究结果强调了主要的物种间易感性差异,特别是利福平,强调不能从嗜肺乳杆菌中安全地推断出治疗范例。这些ecoff为监测非野生型耐药性提供了重要工具。然而,这些来自环境分离物的数据旨在用于流行病学和产生假设的目的,在通知临床实践变化之前,必须辅以临床和药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信