P F Conte, M V Dieci, G Bisagni, P Schmid, A Zambelli, F Piacentini, M De Laurentiis, A G Favaretto, S Tamberi, G V Bianchi, C Zamagni, S Cinieri, D C Corsi, L Del Mastro, A Ferro, A Gennari, M Mion, A Musolino, L Nicolé, P Del Bianco, G L De Salvo, V Guarneri
{"title":"A-BRAVE trial: a phase III randomized trial with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in high-risk triple-negative early breast cancer patients.","authors":"P F Conte, M V Dieci, G Bisagni, P Schmid, A Zambelli, F Piacentini, M De Laurentiis, A G Favaretto, S Tamberi, G V Bianchi, C Zamagni, S Cinieri, D C Corsi, L Del Mastro, A Ferro, A Gennari, M Mion, A Musolino, L Nicolé, P Del Bianco, G L De Salvo, V Guarneri","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The A-BRAVE trial evaluated the efficacy of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, as adjuvant treatment of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A-BRAVE is a phase III study that randomly assigned patients with high-risk early TNBC to 1 year of avelumab versus observation, after completion of standard surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. High-risk was defined as either: (i) ≥pN2/any pT, pN1/pT2, or pN0/pT3 after primary surgery (stratum A); or (ii) invasive residual disease (breast and/or nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (stratum B). Coprimary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and stratum B populations. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and DFS in PD-L1-positive patients. PD-L1 was evaluated in treatment-naïve tumor samples by immunohistochemistry (73-10 RUO assay, Agilent Technologies) and digital pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 2016 to October 2020, 466 patients were randomly assigned: 383 entered stratum B (82%) and 83 entered stratum A (18%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months, avelumab did not significantly improve DFS in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.09, P = 0.172; 3-year DFS estimates were 68.3% for avelumab versus 63.2%], or in stratum B (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.10, P = 0.170; 3-year DFS estimates were 66.9% for avelumab versus 60.7%). In a descriptive analysis, avelumab reduced the hazard of OS events: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97. The 3-year OS estimates for avelumab and control arm were 84.8% (95% CI 79.5% to 88.8%) and 76.3% (95% CI 70.1% to 81.3%), respectively. PD-L1 status was prognostic but not predictive for avelumab benefit in terms of DFS (test for interaction P = 0.155).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with TNBC at high risk of relapse who complete standard treatment with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, 1 year of adjuvant avelumab versus observation did not improve DFS. However, a descriptive analysis suggests a potential favorable impact on OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":65.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The A-BRAVE trial evaluated the efficacy of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, as adjuvant treatment of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk.
Patients and methods: A-BRAVE is a phase III study that randomly assigned patients with high-risk early TNBC to 1 year of avelumab versus observation, after completion of standard surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. High-risk was defined as either: (i) ≥pN2/any pT, pN1/pT2, or pN0/pT3 after primary surgery (stratum A); or (ii) invasive residual disease (breast and/or nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (stratum B). Coprimary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and stratum B populations. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and DFS in PD-L1-positive patients. PD-L1 was evaluated in treatment-naïve tumor samples by immunohistochemistry (73-10 RUO assay, Agilent Technologies) and digital pathology.
Results: From June 2016 to October 2020, 466 patients were randomly assigned: 383 entered stratum B (82%) and 83 entered stratum A (18%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months, avelumab did not significantly improve DFS in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.09, P = 0.172; 3-year DFS estimates were 68.3% for avelumab versus 63.2%], or in stratum B (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.10, P = 0.170; 3-year DFS estimates were 66.9% for avelumab versus 60.7%). In a descriptive analysis, avelumab reduced the hazard of OS events: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97. The 3-year OS estimates for avelumab and control arm were 84.8% (95% CI 79.5% to 88.8%) and 76.3% (95% CI 70.1% to 81.3%), respectively. PD-L1 status was prognostic but not predictive for avelumab benefit in terms of DFS (test for interaction P = 0.155).
Conclusions: For patients with TNBC at high risk of relapse who complete standard treatment with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, 1 year of adjuvant avelumab versus observation did not improve DFS. However, a descriptive analysis suggests a potential favorable impact on OS.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine.
The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings.
Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.