Examining the racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric surgery using the surgical Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR).

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Michael A Kochis, Alyssa Stetson, Carolyn J Reuland, Maimouna O Sy, David C Chang, Tawakalitu O Oseni, Cornelia L Griggs
{"title":"Examining the racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric surgery using the surgical Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR).","authors":"Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Michael A Kochis, Alyssa Stetson, Carolyn J Reuland, Maimouna O Sy, David C Chang, Tawakalitu O Oseni, Cornelia L Griggs","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) ranks multiple postoperative outcomes, potentially enhancing detection of risks influenced by social determinants of health. We examined the relationship between race, ethnicity, and DOOR scores in pediatric surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using NSQIP-Pediatric 2012-2022, we identified patients (≤18 years) who underwent general, urological, and gynecological surgery. DOOR scores range from 1 (most desirable) to 6 (least desirable). Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations with race, ethnicity and DOOR scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 368,190 patients (64.3 ​% non-Hispanic White, 18.2 ​% Hispanic, 13.4 ​% non-Hispanic Black, 3.7 ​% non-Hispanic Asian, and 0.4 ​% non-Hispanic Native), Black patients had increased odds of higher DOOR scores (OR 1.06, 95 ​% CI 1.04-1.10), while Hispanic patients had decreased odds of high DOOR scores (OR 0.89, 95 ​% CI 0.86-0.92). In general and non-elective surgery, Black race was still significantly associated with higher DOOR scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black children faced greater odds of undesirable outcomes. Future work may inform equitable, targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) ranks multiple postoperative outcomes, potentially enhancing detection of risks influenced by social determinants of health. We examined the relationship between race, ethnicity, and DOOR scores in pediatric surgical patients.

Methods: Using NSQIP-Pediatric 2012-2022, we identified patients (≤18 years) who underwent general, urological, and gynecological surgery. DOOR scores range from 1 (most desirable) to 6 (least desirable). Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations with race, ethnicity and DOOR scores.

Results: Among 368,190 patients (64.3 ​% non-Hispanic White, 18.2 ​% Hispanic, 13.4 ​% non-Hispanic Black, 3.7 ​% non-Hispanic Asian, and 0.4 ​% non-Hispanic Native), Black patients had increased odds of higher DOOR scores (OR 1.06, 95 ​% CI 1.04-1.10), while Hispanic patients had decreased odds of high DOOR scores (OR 0.89, 95 ​% CI 0.86-0.92). In general and non-elective surgery, Black race was still significantly associated with higher DOOR scores.

Conclusions: Black children faced greater odds of undesirable outcomes. Future work may inform equitable, targeted interventions.

使用手术结果排序(DOOR)检查儿科外科的种族和民族差异。
结果排序的可取性(DOOR)对多种术后结果进行排序,潜在地增强了对受健康社会决定因素影响的风险的检测。我们研究了儿科外科患者的种族、民族和DOOR评分之间的关系。方法:使用NSQIP-Pediatric 2012-2022,我们确定了接受普通外科、泌尿外科和妇科手术的患者(≤18岁)。DOOR得分范围从1(最理想)到6(最不理想)。有序逻辑回归评估了种族、民族和DOOR得分之间的关系。结果:在368,190例患者中(64.3%的非西班牙裔白人,18.2%的西班牙裔,13.4%的非西班牙裔黑人,3.7%的非西班牙裔亚洲人和0.4%的非西班牙裔原住民),黑人患者获得较高DOOR评分的几率增加(OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.10),而西班牙裔患者获得较高DOOR评分的几率降低(OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.92)。在一般和非选择性手术中,黑人种族仍然与较高的DOOR评分显著相关。结论:黑人儿童面临更大的不良后果的可能性。未来的工作可能会为公平、有针对性的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信