{"title":"Forward Weight Prediction among Small for Gestational Age, Average for Gestational Age, and Large for Gestational Age Neonates.","authors":"Stephanie Masters, Nneoma Edokobi, Chloe Lessard, Benny Antony Amaraselvam, Ryan Bradley, Monica Ahrens, Megan Whitham","doi":"10.1055/a-2689-2368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) forward projection model among neonates classified as small (SGA), appropriate (AGA), or large for gestational age (LGA), and to assess the impact of elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) on prediction accuracy. The GAP model uses percentile-based extrapolation to predict birth weight from remote ultrasounds, maintaining fetal weight percentile from scan to delivery, unlike traditional methods relying on static weight estimates near delivery.We conducted a retrospective review (2016-2023) of singleton, liveborn, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered after 28 weeks. Exclusions included multiples, major anomalies, stillbirth, and missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds or mid-gestational anatomical surveys. Among 1,559 records reviewed, 554 (35.5%) met inclusion criteria, with exclusions primarily due to missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds and mid-gestational anatomical surveys. This represents approximately 5.6% of total deliveries during the study period, reflecting our specific inclusion requirement for third-trimester growth assessments beyond routine prenatal care. GAP prediction accuracy was defined as birth weight prediction within 10% of actual, consistent with prior literature. Percent error and absolute percent error were also evaluated.Median absolute percent error for the cohort was 8.56% (interquartile range: 3.9, 15.2). Accuracy within 10% of actual birth weight was achieved in 51.4% of normal weight, 64.1% of overweight, and 58.0% of obese patients (<i>p</i> = 0.031). SGA infants were more often underestimated (median error: -15.79%) than AGA (-5.05%) or LGA (1.18%) infants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Accuracy within 10% was achieved in 64.8% of AGA, 29.9% of SGA, and 66.9% of LGA infants (<i>p</i> < 0.001).The GAP model demonstrates better accuracy in pregnancies with elevated maternal BMI and similar accuracy for LGA and AGA infants. Findings support its potential value in high-risk groups, such as those with obesity or suspected LGA. · GAP model shows 8.6% median error in weight estimate.. · SGA often underestimated; LGA more accurate.. · GAP performs well in overweight and obese patients..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2689-2368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) forward projection model among neonates classified as small (SGA), appropriate (AGA), or large for gestational age (LGA), and to assess the impact of elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) on prediction accuracy. The GAP model uses percentile-based extrapolation to predict birth weight from remote ultrasounds, maintaining fetal weight percentile from scan to delivery, unlike traditional methods relying on static weight estimates near delivery.We conducted a retrospective review (2016-2023) of singleton, liveborn, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered after 28 weeks. Exclusions included multiples, major anomalies, stillbirth, and missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds or mid-gestational anatomical surveys. Among 1,559 records reviewed, 554 (35.5%) met inclusion criteria, with exclusions primarily due to missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds and mid-gestational anatomical surveys. This represents approximately 5.6% of total deliveries during the study period, reflecting our specific inclusion requirement for third-trimester growth assessments beyond routine prenatal care. GAP prediction accuracy was defined as birth weight prediction within 10% of actual, consistent with prior literature. Percent error and absolute percent error were also evaluated.Median absolute percent error for the cohort was 8.56% (interquartile range: 3.9, 15.2). Accuracy within 10% of actual birth weight was achieved in 51.4% of normal weight, 64.1% of overweight, and 58.0% of obese patients (p = 0.031). SGA infants were more often underestimated (median error: -15.79%) than AGA (-5.05%) or LGA (1.18%) infants (p < 0.001). Accuracy within 10% was achieved in 64.8% of AGA, 29.9% of SGA, and 66.9% of LGA infants (p < 0.001).The GAP model demonstrates better accuracy in pregnancies with elevated maternal BMI and similar accuracy for LGA and AGA infants. Findings support its potential value in high-risk groups, such as those with obesity or suspected LGA. · GAP model shows 8.6% median error in weight estimate.. · SGA often underestimated; LGA more accurate.. · GAP performs well in overweight and obese patients..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.