Forward Weight Prediction among Small for Gestational Age, Average for Gestational Age, and Large for Gestational Age Neonates.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Stephanie Masters, Nneoma Edokobi, Chloe Lessard, Benny Antony Amaraselvam, Ryan Bradley, Monica Ahrens, Megan Whitham
{"title":"Forward Weight Prediction among Small for Gestational Age, Average for Gestational Age, and Large for Gestational Age Neonates.","authors":"Stephanie Masters, Nneoma Edokobi, Chloe Lessard, Benny Antony Amaraselvam, Ryan Bradley, Monica Ahrens, Megan Whitham","doi":"10.1055/a-2689-2368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) forward projection model among neonates classified as small (SGA), appropriate (AGA), or large for gestational age (LGA), and to assess the impact of elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) on prediction accuracy. The GAP model uses percentile-based extrapolation to predict birth weight from remote ultrasounds, maintaining fetal weight percentile from scan to delivery, unlike traditional methods relying on static weight estimates near delivery.We conducted a retrospective review (2016-2023) of singleton, liveborn, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered after 28 weeks. Exclusions included multiples, major anomalies, stillbirth, and missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds or mid-gestational anatomical surveys. Among 1,559 records reviewed, 554 (35.5%) met inclusion criteria, with exclusions primarily due to missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds and mid-gestational anatomical surveys. This represents approximately 5.6% of total deliveries during the study period, reflecting our specific inclusion requirement for third-trimester growth assessments beyond routine prenatal care. GAP prediction accuracy was defined as birth weight prediction within 10% of actual, consistent with prior literature. Percent error and absolute percent error were also evaluated.Median absolute percent error for the cohort was 8.56% (interquartile range: 3.9, 15.2). Accuracy within 10% of actual birth weight was achieved in 51.4% of normal weight, 64.1% of overweight, and 58.0% of obese patients (<i>p</i> = 0.031). SGA infants were more often underestimated (median error: -15.79%) than AGA (-5.05%) or LGA (1.18%) infants (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Accuracy within 10% was achieved in 64.8% of AGA, 29.9% of SGA, and 66.9% of LGA infants (<i>p</i> < 0.001).The GAP model demonstrates better accuracy in pregnancies with elevated maternal BMI and similar accuracy for LGA and AGA infants. Findings support its potential value in high-risk groups, such as those with obesity or suspected LGA. · GAP model shows 8.6% median error in weight estimate.. · SGA often underestimated; LGA more accurate.. · GAP performs well in overweight and obese patients..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2689-2368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) forward projection model among neonates classified as small (SGA), appropriate (AGA), or large for gestational age (LGA), and to assess the impact of elevated maternal body mass index (BMI) on prediction accuracy. The GAP model uses percentile-based extrapolation to predict birth weight from remote ultrasounds, maintaining fetal weight percentile from scan to delivery, unlike traditional methods relying on static weight estimates near delivery.We conducted a retrospective review (2016-2023) of singleton, liveborn, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered after 28 weeks. Exclusions included multiples, major anomalies, stillbirth, and missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds or mid-gestational anatomical surveys. Among 1,559 records reviewed, 554 (35.5%) met inclusion criteria, with exclusions primarily due to missing third-trimester growth ultrasounds and mid-gestational anatomical surveys. This represents approximately 5.6% of total deliveries during the study period, reflecting our specific inclusion requirement for third-trimester growth assessments beyond routine prenatal care. GAP prediction accuracy was defined as birth weight prediction within 10% of actual, consistent with prior literature. Percent error and absolute percent error were also evaluated.Median absolute percent error for the cohort was 8.56% (interquartile range: 3.9, 15.2). Accuracy within 10% of actual birth weight was achieved in 51.4% of normal weight, 64.1% of overweight, and 58.0% of obese patients (p = 0.031). SGA infants were more often underestimated (median error: -15.79%) than AGA (-5.05%) or LGA (1.18%) infants (p < 0.001). Accuracy within 10% was achieved in 64.8% of AGA, 29.9% of SGA, and 66.9% of LGA infants (p < 0.001).The GAP model demonstrates better accuracy in pregnancies with elevated maternal BMI and similar accuracy for LGA and AGA infants. Findings support its potential value in high-risk groups, such as those with obesity or suspected LGA. · GAP model shows 8.6% median error in weight estimate.. · SGA often underestimated; LGA more accurate.. · GAP performs well in overweight and obese patients..

小胎龄(SGA),平均胎龄(AGA)和大胎龄(LGA)新生儿的前向体重预测。
目的:评价妊娠调整投影(GAP)前向投影模型在小(SGA)、合适(AGA)和胎龄大(LGA)新生儿中的准确性,并评估母体体重指数(BMI)升高对预测准确性的影响。GAP模型使用基于百分位数的外推法从远程超声波中预测出生体重,保持胎儿从扫描到分娩的体重百分位数,而不像传统方法依赖于分娩时的静态体重估计。研究设计:我们对28周后分娩的单胎、活胎、非异常妊娠进行了回顾性研究(2016-2023)。排除包括多胎、重大异常、死产、缺少妊娠晚期生长超声检查或妊娠中期解剖检查。在回顾的1559份记录中,554份(35.5%)符合纳入标准,主要原因是缺少妊娠晚期生长超声检查和妊娠中期解剖调查。这约占研究期间分娩总数的5.6%,反映了我们在常规产前护理之外对妊娠晚期生长评估的特殊纳入要求。GAP预测准确度定义为出生体重预测与实际出生体重预测误差在10%以内,与既往文献一致。误差百分比和绝对误差百分比也进行了评估。结果:该队列的中位绝对百分比误差为8.56% (IQR为3.9,15.2)。51.4%的正常体重患者、64.1%的超重患者和58.0%的肥胖患者与实际出生体重的准确度在10%以内(p=0.031)。与AGA(-5.05%)或LGA(1.18%)相比,SGA婴儿更容易被低估(中位误差-15.79%)。结论:GAP模型在母亲BMI升高的妊娠中具有更好的准确性,LGA和AGA婴儿的准确性相似。研究结果支持其在高风险人群中的潜在价值,如肥胖或疑似LGA的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信