Decomposing the Disparity in 1-Year Postpartum Readmission between People with and without a Potentially Traumatic Birth Event.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kaitlyn K Stanhope, Marisa R Young, Sheree L Boulet, Danielle Vuncannon, Vasiliki Michopoulos, Abigail Powers, Suchitra Chandrasekaran
{"title":"Decomposing the Disparity in 1-Year Postpartum Readmission between People with and without a Potentially Traumatic Birth Event.","authors":"Kaitlyn K Stanhope, Marisa R Young, Sheree L Boulet, Danielle Vuncannon, Vasiliki Michopoulos, Abigail Powers, Suchitra Chandrasekaran","doi":"10.1055/a-2693-1734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic birth, characterized by high perceived risk to the life of the birthing person or fetus and intense fear, is associated with poor postpartum mental health. However, little is known about the relationship between potentially traumatic birth and postpartum physical health. The goal of this study was to estimate the difference in 1-year postpartum readmission between individuals who experienced a potentially traumatic birth event (severe maternal morbidity [SMM], stillbirth, extremely preterm birth [EPTB]) and those who did not, and to quantify the proportion explained by medical, demographic, and care use variables.We used data from deliveries at Grady and Emory Health Systems between 2016 and 2021 to identify deliveries to individuals who experienced a potentially traumatic birth (stillbirth, SMM, or EPTB <28 weeks) or did not. We fit Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition models to estimate the proportion of the disparity in 1-year postpartum readmissions explained by pre-existing obstetric and medical risk (Obstetric Comorbidity Index [OCI], psychiatric diagnoses at delivery, delivery mode), sociodemographic characteristics (age, parity, race, insurance, delivery hospital), and perinatal care use (postpartum visit timing [early, late, on time, and/or none], prenatal care use [any/none], postpartum contraceptive receipt [any/none]).We included 33,153 deliveries, 2498 of which were characterized as a potentially traumatic birth due to stillbirth (331, 1.0%), SMM (1957, 5.9%), and/or EPTB (344, 1.0%). People experiencing any one of these events were more likely to be readmitted in the 12 months postpartum (6.4 vs. 2.4%, risk difference: 4.01 per 100 deliveries, 95% CI: 3.03, 4.99). 54.3% of this excess risk was explained by medical, demographic, and site of care variables, with the largest percent explained by the OCI (46.4%).People who experience SMM, stillbirth, or EPTB experienced elevated postpartum readmission risk, half of which cannot be explained by medical risk or demographics. · Postpartum risk is elevated following poor delivery outcomes, yet the reasons are not well-characterized.. · Medical, psychiatric, demographic, and site of care factors explained 54% of the excess postpartum readmission risk among individuals following stillbirth, EPTB, or SMM at delivery.. · Unexplained risk of readmission in the postpartum year cannot be fully explained by medical risk, demographics, or care use..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2693-1734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic birth, characterized by high perceived risk to the life of the birthing person or fetus and intense fear, is associated with poor postpartum mental health. However, little is known about the relationship between potentially traumatic birth and postpartum physical health. The goal of this study was to estimate the difference in 1-year postpartum readmission between individuals who experienced a potentially traumatic birth event (severe maternal morbidity [SMM], stillbirth, extremely preterm birth [EPTB]) and those who did not, and to quantify the proportion explained by medical, demographic, and care use variables.We used data from deliveries at Grady and Emory Health Systems between 2016 and 2021 to identify deliveries to individuals who experienced a potentially traumatic birth (stillbirth, SMM, or EPTB <28 weeks) or did not. We fit Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition models to estimate the proportion of the disparity in 1-year postpartum readmissions explained by pre-existing obstetric and medical risk (Obstetric Comorbidity Index [OCI], psychiatric diagnoses at delivery, delivery mode), sociodemographic characteristics (age, parity, race, insurance, delivery hospital), and perinatal care use (postpartum visit timing [early, late, on time, and/or none], prenatal care use [any/none], postpartum contraceptive receipt [any/none]).We included 33,153 deliveries, 2498 of which were characterized as a potentially traumatic birth due to stillbirth (331, 1.0%), SMM (1957, 5.9%), and/or EPTB (344, 1.0%). People experiencing any one of these events were more likely to be readmitted in the 12 months postpartum (6.4 vs. 2.4%, risk difference: 4.01 per 100 deliveries, 95% CI: 3.03, 4.99). 54.3% of this excess risk was explained by medical, demographic, and site of care variables, with the largest percent explained by the OCI (46.4%).People who experience SMM, stillbirth, or EPTB experienced elevated postpartum readmission risk, half of which cannot be explained by medical risk or demographics. · Postpartum risk is elevated following poor delivery outcomes, yet the reasons are not well-characterized.. · Medical, psychiatric, demographic, and site of care factors explained 54% of the excess postpartum readmission risk among individuals following stillbirth, EPTB, or SMM at delivery.. · Unexplained risk of readmission in the postpartum year cannot be fully explained by medical risk, demographics, or care use..

分解有和没有潜在创伤性分娩事件的人在产后一年再入院的差异。
目的:创伤性分娩与产后心理健康状况不佳有关,其特点是对分娩人或胎儿生命的高感知风险和强烈的恐惧。然而,人们对潜在的创伤性分娩与产后身体健康之间的关系知之甚少。本研究的目的是估计经历过潜在创伤性分娩事件(严重产妇发病率、死产、极度早产)的个体和没有经历过的个体在产后一年再入院的差异,并量化由医学、人口统计学和护理使用变量解释的比例。研究设计:我们使用Grady和Emory健康系统在2016-2021年间的分娩数据,以确定经历过潜在创伤性分娩(死产、严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)或极度早产(EPTB, < 28周))或未经历过创伤性分娩的个体。我们拟合blind - oaxaca分解模型,以估计由先前存在的产科和医疗风险(产科合并症指数、分娩时的精神诊断、分娩方式)、社会人口学特征(年龄、胎次、种族、保险、分娩医院)和围产期护理使用(产后就诊时间(早、晚、准时和/或没有)、产前护理使用(有/没有)、产后避孕药收据(有/没有)。结果:我们纳入了33,153例分娩,其中2498例为死产(331,1.0%)、SMM(1957, 5.9%)和/或EPTB(344,1.0%)所致的潜在创伤性分娩。经历这些事件中的任何一种的人更有可能在产后12个月内再次入院(6.4 vs 2.4%,风险差异:4.01 / 100次分娩,95% CI: 3.03, 4.99)。54.3%的这种额外风险是由医疗、人口统计和护理地点变量解释的,最大的百分比是由产科合并症指数解释的(46.4%)。结论:经历过SMM、死产或EPTB的人产后再入院风险较高,其中一半不能用医疗风险或人口统计学来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信