Colchicine for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cumulative-Dose Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials including 31,397 Subjects Worldwide.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hoi-Ying Li, Joseph Cheriyan, Tsz-Kwan Chan, Kai-Hang Yiu, Hung-Fat Tse, Ian B Wilkinson, Yap-Hang Chan
{"title":"Colchicine for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cumulative-Dose Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials including 31,397 Subjects Worldwide.","authors":"Hoi-Ying Li, Joseph Cheriyan, Tsz-Kwan Chan, Kai-Hang Yiu, Hung-Fat Tse, Ian B Wilkinson, Yap-Hang Chan","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00743-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colchicine has been incorporated into major clinical guidelines for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, recent randomized trials have presented contradictory results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to synthesize the current evidence on colchicine in secondary CVD protection, using a cumulative-dose approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis incorporating all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) globally. RCTs directly comparing colchicine versus placebo/standard care for the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular or coronary vascular disease were included. Odds ratios (OR) were derived for the primary outcome, defined as the prospective occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included mortality, individual components of MACE, C-reactive protein, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 14 RCTs including 31,397 participants were included. Colchicine significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.94) in both acute atherothrombotic CVD and all CVD (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60-0.86) and resulted in significant prospective reductions in C-reactive protein. The threshold effect was apparent, with a protective benefit of colchicine against MACE at higher cumulative exposure ≥ 90 mg-days (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84). Colchicine resulted in no differences in cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colchicine significantly reduces MACE in both acute atherothrombotic and all CVD across multiple ethnicities, with a threshold protective effect that clinically corresponds to treatment with 0.5 mg daily for at least 6 months. Importantly, there was no signal of increased all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier no. CRD420251003142.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00743-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colchicine has been incorporated into major clinical guidelines for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, recent randomized trials have presented contradictory results.

Objective: We aimed to synthesize the current evidence on colchicine in secondary CVD protection, using a cumulative-dose approach.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis incorporating all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) globally. RCTs directly comparing colchicine versus placebo/standard care for the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular or coronary vascular disease were included. Odds ratios (OR) were derived for the primary outcome, defined as the prospective occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included mortality, individual components of MACE, C-reactive protein, and adverse effects.

Results: In total, 14 RCTs including 31,397 participants were included. Colchicine significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.94) in both acute atherothrombotic CVD and all CVD (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60-0.86) and resulted in significant prospective reductions in C-reactive protein. The threshold effect was apparent, with a protective benefit of colchicine against MACE at higher cumulative exposure ≥ 90 mg-days (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84). Colchicine resulted in no differences in cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions: Colchicine significantly reduces MACE in both acute atherothrombotic and all CVD across multiple ethnicities, with a threshold protective effect that clinically corresponds to treatment with 0.5 mg daily for at least 6 months. Importantly, there was no signal of increased all-cause mortality.

Registration: PROSPERO identifier no. CRD420251003142.

秋水仙碱对心血管疾病的二级预防:一项全球31,397名受试者的随机对照试验的累积剂量荟萃分析
背景:秋水仙碱已被纳入心血管疾病(CVD)二级预防的主要临床指南。然而,最近的随机试验给出了相互矛盾的结果。目的:采用累积剂量法,综合目前秋水仙碱对继发性心血管疾病保护作用的证据。方法:我们对全球所有随机对照试验(rct)进行了荟萃分析。包括直接比较秋水仙碱与安慰剂/标准护理对脑血管或冠状动脉疾病二级预防的随机对照试验。得出主要结局的优势比(OR),定义为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预期发生。次要结局包括死亡率、MACE的个体成分、c反应蛋白和不良反应。结果:共纳入14项rct,共31,397名受试者。秋水仙碱显著降低急性动脉粥样硬化性血栓性CVD和所有CVD的MACE (OR 0.80; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.68-0.94) (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60-0.86),并导致c反应蛋白的显著预期降低。阈值效应很明显,当累计暴露≥90 mg-days时,秋水仙碱对MACE具有保护作用(OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84)。秋水仙碱对心血管和非心血管死亡率没有影响。结论:秋水仙碱可显著降低多种族急性动脉粥样硬化血栓形成和所有CVD患者的MACE,具有阈值保护作用,临床相当于每天0.5 mg治疗至少6个月。重要的是,没有迹象表明全因死亡率增加。注册:普洛斯彼罗标识号CRD420251003142。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信