Tianxue Long, Yating Zhang, Yi Wu, Pengbo Xing, Yiyun Zhang, Mingzi Li
{"title":"Food Choice Decision-Making Profiles and Health Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight/Obesity: A Cluster Analysis.","authors":"Tianxue Long, Yating Zhang, Yi Wu, Pengbo Xing, Yiyun Zhang, Mingzi Li","doi":"10.1177/08901171251371447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251371447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251371447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.