Simulation-free cone beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lisette Juul Sten, Evangelos Giannoulis, Laura Ann Rechner, Lina Åström, Anna Mann Nielsen, Jens Morgenthaler Edmund, Gitte Fredberg Persson
{"title":"Simulation-free cone beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression.","authors":"Lisette Juul Sten, Evangelos Giannoulis, Laura Ann Rechner, Lina Åström, Anna Mann Nielsen, Jens Morgenthaler Edmund, Gitte Fredberg Persson","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A simulation-free approach, using the patient's diagnostic computed tomography (CT) for treatment planning, eliminates the need for a separate planning CT. Combined with conebeam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART), this strategy has the potential to create a more efficient treatment workflow and reduce the burden for the patients. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and time consumption of different simulation-free oART workflows for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) to identify the most suitable option for clinical implementation. Patient/material and methods: Diagnostic CT scans from patients diagnosed with MSCC were used for treatment planning, while CBCT scans from their first treatment session were retrospectively used to emulate the treatments. Four adaptive workflows were defined and assessed: Deformable Supervised (DefSup), Deformable Unsupervised (DefUn), Rigid Supervised (RigSup), and Rigid Unsupervised (RigUn). The supervised workflows involved manual corrections to the target structures, whereas the unsupervised workflows did not include any manual adjustments. Time stamps, segmentation quality, and dose plans were used to evaluate the feasibility of each workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 simulation-free emulations were performed (based on 27 patients with 30 target sites). The DefSup workflow yielded the highest accuracy in both segmentation and dose distribution. Additionally, with a median time consumption of 6.57 min, this workflow demonstrates a level of reliability and quality suitable for clinical application.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The DefSup workflow was found to be the most optimal and safe for clinical implementation, as demonstrated by the successful treatment of the first patient with MSCC using this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1095-1101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: A simulation-free approach, using the patient's diagnostic computed tomography (CT) for treatment planning, eliminates the need for a separate planning CT. Combined with conebeam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (oART), this strategy has the potential to create a more efficient treatment workflow and reduce the burden for the patients. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and time consumption of different simulation-free oART workflows for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) to identify the most suitable option for clinical implementation. Patient/material and methods: Diagnostic CT scans from patients diagnosed with MSCC were used for treatment planning, while CBCT scans from their first treatment session were retrospectively used to emulate the treatments. Four adaptive workflows were defined and assessed: Deformable Supervised (DefSup), Deformable Unsupervised (DefUn), Rigid Supervised (RigSup), and Rigid Unsupervised (RigUn). The supervised workflows involved manual corrections to the target structures, whereas the unsupervised workflows did not include any manual adjustments. Time stamps, segmentation quality, and dose plans were used to evaluate the feasibility of each workflow.

Results: A total of 120 simulation-free emulations were performed (based on 27 patients with 30 target sites). The DefSup workflow yielded the highest accuracy in both segmentation and dose distribution. Additionally, with a median time consumption of 6.57 min, this workflow demonstrates a level of reliability and quality suitable for clinical application.

Interpretation: The DefSup workflow was found to be the most optimal and safe for clinical implementation, as demonstrated by the successful treatment of the first patient with MSCC using this approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于无模拟锥束ct的在线自适应放疗治疗转移性脊髓压迫。
背景和目的:一种无模拟的方法,使用患者的诊断性计算机断层扫描(CT)进行治疗计划,消除了对单独规划CT的需要。结合锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)引导的在线适应性放疗(oART),该策略有可能创造更有效的治疗工作流程并减轻患者的负担。该研究旨在评估转移性脊髓压迫(MSCC)患者不同的无模拟oART工作流程的可行性和耗时,以确定最适合临床实施的选择。患者/材料和方法:诊断为MSCC的患者的诊断性CT扫描用于治疗计划,而回顾性地使用他们第一次治疗的CBCT扫描来模拟治疗。定义并评估了四个自适应工作流:可变形监督工作流(DefSup)、可变形无监督工作流(DefUn)、刚性监督工作流(RigSup)和刚性无监督工作流(RigUn)。受监督的工作流涉及对目标结构的手动更正,而无监督的工作流不包括任何手动调整。使用时间戳、分割质量和剂量计划来评估每个工作流程的可行性。结果:共进行了120次无模拟模拟(基于27例患者,30个靶点)。DefSup工作流程在分割和剂量分布方面都具有最高的准确性。此外,该工作流程的平均耗时为6.57分钟,显示出适合临床应用的可靠性和质量水平。解释:DefSup工作流程被认为是临床实施中最优和安全的,正如使用该方法成功治疗首例MSCC患者所证明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信