Milisa Manojlovich, Caitlin Cassady, Sarah J Parker, Ellie Davis, Charlotte Ahr, David Ryamukuru, Anna Wang, Kalyan Pasupathy, Hardeep Singh, Prashant Mahajan
{"title":"Using Video Ethnography and Stimulated Recall Interviews to Describe the Diagnostic Process in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Milisa Manojlovich, Caitlin Cassady, Sarah J Parker, Ellie Davis, Charlotte Ahr, David Ryamukuru, Anna Wang, Kalyan Pasupathy, Hardeep Singh, Prashant Mahajan","doi":"10.1111/acem.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding how physicians make diagnoses is challenging because cognitive processes are unobservable and partly unconscious, making it difficult for physicians to describe how they arrived at a diagnosis. Physicians who work in emergency departments (EDs) are especially vulnerable to making diagnostic errors because the ED is a fast-paced, dynamic setting where complex decision-making occurs under severe time, information, and resource constraints. The purpose of our study was to describe how the diagnostic process evolves for ED clinicians in both pediatric and adult ED settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative, video ethnography study design to capture in situ, real-time ED physician practice for 11 participants from February 2022 to July 2023. Participants wore a head-mounted video camera while providing care to ED patients, and in subsequent stimulated recall interviews, revealed their thinking throughout the diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recorded 24.42 h of video overall (average 2.22 h per participant). We identified four major themes in the ED diagnostic process: (1) quality communication facilitates information flow, (2) cognition is complex and distributed across patients and the ED team, (3) artifacts can enhance the diagnostic process, and (4) there is a need to balance efficiency with safety and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Illustrating physicians' cognitive processes through video ethnography coupled with stimulated recall interviews helped advance our understanding of the diagnostic process and is a foundational step for identifying improvement opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Understanding how physicians make diagnoses is challenging because cognitive processes are unobservable and partly unconscious, making it difficult for physicians to describe how they arrived at a diagnosis. Physicians who work in emergency departments (EDs) are especially vulnerable to making diagnostic errors because the ED is a fast-paced, dynamic setting where complex decision-making occurs under severe time, information, and resource constraints. The purpose of our study was to describe how the diagnostic process evolves for ED clinicians in both pediatric and adult ED settings.
Methods: We used a qualitative, video ethnography study design to capture in situ, real-time ED physician practice for 11 participants from February 2022 to July 2023. Participants wore a head-mounted video camera while providing care to ED patients, and in subsequent stimulated recall interviews, revealed their thinking throughout the diagnostic process.
Results: We recorded 24.42 h of video overall (average 2.22 h per participant). We identified four major themes in the ED diagnostic process: (1) quality communication facilitates information flow, (2) cognition is complex and distributed across patients and the ED team, (3) artifacts can enhance the diagnostic process, and (4) there is a need to balance efficiency with safety and accuracy.
Conclusions: Illustrating physicians' cognitive processes through video ethnography coupled with stimulated recall interviews helped advance our understanding of the diagnostic process and is a foundational step for identifying improvement opportunities.
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.