Efficacy and Safety of Adjunct Medications in ED Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks: A National Ultrasound-Guided NeRVE (NURVE) Block Registry Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joseph Brown, Fred Milgrim, Lachlan Driver, Melissa A Meeker, Ryan Tucker, Nhu-Nguyen Le, Arun Nagdev, Nicole M Duggan, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Matthew Riscinti, Andrew Goldsmith
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Adjunct Medications in ED Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks: A National Ultrasound-Guided NeRVE (NURVE) Block Registry Study.","authors":"Joseph Brown, Fred Milgrim, Lachlan Driver, Melissa A Meeker, Ryan Tucker, Nhu-Nguyen Le, Arun Nagdev, Nicole M Duggan, David Martin, Michael Heffler, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrea Dreyfuss, Christopher Fung, Leland Perice, Natalie Truong, S Zan Jafry, Michael Macias, Matthew Riscinti, Andrew Goldsmith","doi":"10.1111/acem.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) are a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in emergency departments (EDs). In addition to using standard local anesthetics, adjuncts have been demonstrated to extend the duration of UGNBs. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and epinephrine as anesthetic adjuncts in UGNBs in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from the National Ultrasound-guided neRVE (NURVE) Block Registry, a retrospective, multicenter, observational registry evaluating UGNBs performed in 11 EDs from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. A generalized linear mixed effects model (GLMER) with a binomial family examined factors associated with pain reduction when comparing adjunct vs. non-adjunct UGNBs. The dependent variable and primary outcome were pain reduction. Secondary outcomes included safety, dosing of adjuncts, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29.6% (812/2742) of UGNBs received adjuncts, most commonly dexamethasone (72.5%, 589/812) and epinephrine (23.5%, 191/812). Dexamethasone had a 1.99 odds ratio of > 50% pain reduction versus isolated local anesthetic blocks, while epinephrine had an odds ratio of 0.99 for > 50% pain reduction. There was no association between adjunct use and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to isolated local anesthetic nerve blocks, dexamethasone had an association with improved pain control within 60 min; without additional safety concerns in a large retrospective dataset. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate these findings in the ED setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) are a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in emergency departments (EDs). In addition to using standard local anesthetics, adjuncts have been demonstrated to extend the duration of UGNBs. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and epinephrine as anesthetic adjuncts in UGNBs in the ED.

Methods: Data were analyzed from the National Ultrasound-guided neRVE (NURVE) Block Registry, a retrospective, multicenter, observational registry evaluating UGNBs performed in 11 EDs from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. A generalized linear mixed effects model (GLMER) with a binomial family examined factors associated with pain reduction when comparing adjunct vs. non-adjunct UGNBs. The dependent variable and primary outcome were pain reduction. Secondary outcomes included safety, dosing of adjuncts, and complications.

Results: A total of 29.6% (812/2742) of UGNBs received adjuncts, most commonly dexamethasone (72.5%, 589/812) and epinephrine (23.5%, 191/812). Dexamethasone had a 1.99 odds ratio of > 50% pain reduction versus isolated local anesthetic blocks, while epinephrine had an odds ratio of 0.99 for > 50% pain reduction. There was no association between adjunct use and complications.

Conclusion: Compared to isolated local anesthetic nerve blocks, dexamethasone had an association with improved pain control within 60 min; without additional safety concerns in a large retrospective dataset. Prospective studies are needed to further investigate these findings in the ED setting.

ED超声引导神经阻滞中辅助药物的疗效和安全性:一项全国超声引导神经阻滞注册研究。
背景:超声引导神经阻滞(ugnb)是急诊科(EDs)急性疼痛管理的多模式镇痛的核心组成部分。除了使用标准的局部麻醉剂外,已证明辅助剂可以延长ugnb的持续时间。我们评估了地塞米松和肾上腺素作为麻醉辅助剂治疗ed中ugnb的有效性和安全性。方法:数据分析来自国家超声引导神经(NURVE)块登记,这是一项回顾性、多中心、观察性登记,评估了2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日在11例ed中进行的ugnb。一个二项家族的广义线性混合效应模型(GLMER)在比较辅助与非辅助ugb时检查了与疼痛减轻相关的因素。因变量和主要结局是疼痛减轻。次要结局包括安全性、辅助药物的剂量和并发症。结果:共有29.6%(812/2742)的ugnb接受了辅助治疗,最常见的是地塞米松(72.5%,589/812)和肾上腺素(23.5%,191/812)。地塞米松与局部麻醉阻滞相比,减轻> 50%疼痛的比值比为1.99,而肾上腺素减轻> 50%疼痛的比值比为0.99。辅助使用与并发症之间没有关联。结论:与孤立的局麻神经阻滞相比,地塞米松在60分钟内改善了疼痛控制;在大型回顾性数据集中没有额外的安全问题。需要前瞻性研究来进一步调查这些发现在急诊科的设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信