The Role of Sonication in Improving the Detection of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: a Prospective Analysis.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Jakub Rapi, Vasileios Apostolopoulos, Filip Růžička, Martina Vaněrková, Pavel Brančík, Tomáš Tomáš
{"title":"The Role of Sonication in Improving the Detection of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: a Prospective Analysis.","authors":"Jakub Rapi, Vasileios Apostolopoulos, Filip Růžička, Martina Vaněrková, Pavel Brančík, Tomáš Tomáš","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be particularly challenging in cases of low-grade chronic infection. The suspicion of infection is typically confirmed through cultures of synovial fluid and periprosthetic tissue. However, these methods may not always detect low-grade infections, which can lead to persistent infection and early failure of the prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of sonication in enhancing the detection of PJI using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 26 patients, suspected of having mitigated PJI, underwent surgery at the First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno between 2019 and 2024. The cohort included 16 women and 10 men, aged 56 to 82 years, with infections involving hip (11 cases) or knee prostheses (15 cases). Standard PCR and sonication followed by PCR were used to confirm PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 20 out of 26 cases, both standard PCR and sonication-assisted PCR detected the infection(p= 0.014). However, in 6 cases, standard PCR failed to identify the pathogen, whereas sonication followed by PCR confirmed the infection. Among these, 4 cases had significantly positive results, and 2 showed weak positivity. The most common pathogens detected were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (12 cases), followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and others.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that the integration of sonication with PCR markedly enhances the detection of PJI, especially in instances where standard PCR techniques may be insufficient, such as in low-grade chronic infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"92 4","pages":"187-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be particularly challenging in cases of low-grade chronic infection. The suspicion of infection is typically confirmed through cultures of synovial fluid and periprosthetic tissue. However, these methods may not always detect low-grade infections, which can lead to persistent infection and early failure of the prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of sonication in enhancing the detection of PJI using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

Material and methods: A prospective cohort of 26 patients, suspected of having mitigated PJI, underwent surgery at the First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno between 2019 and 2024. The cohort included 16 women and 10 men, aged 56 to 82 years, with infections involving hip (11 cases) or knee prostheses (15 cases). Standard PCR and sonication followed by PCR were used to confirm PJI.

Results: In 20 out of 26 cases, both standard PCR and sonication-assisted PCR detected the infection(p= 0.014). However, in 6 cases, standard PCR failed to identify the pathogen, whereas sonication followed by PCR confirmed the infection. Among these, 4 cases had significantly positive results, and 2 showed weak positivity. The most common pathogens detected were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (12 cases), followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and others.

Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the integration of sonication with PCR markedly enhances the detection of PJI, especially in instances where standard PCR techniques may be insufficient, such as in low-grade chronic infections.

超声在改善假体周围关节感染检测中的作用:一项前瞻性分析。
研究目的:在低级别慢性感染病例中,假体周围关节感染(PJI)的诊断尤其具有挑战性。通常通过滑膜液和假体周围组织的培养来证实感染的怀疑。然而,这些方法可能并不总是检测到低级别感染,这可能导致持续感染和假体的早期失效。本研究的目的是评价超声增强聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测PJI的有效性。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究,包括26名疑似减轻PJI的患者,于2019年至2024年在布尔诺圣安妮大学医院第一骨科接受手术。该队列包括16名女性和10名男性,年龄56至82岁,感染涉及髋关节(11例)或膝关节假体(15例)。采用标准PCR和超声PCR法对PJI进行确证。结果:标准PCR和超声辅助PCR均检出20例感染(p= 0.014)。6例标准PCR未检出病原菌,超声后PCR证实感染。其中显著阳性4例,弱阳性2例。检出的病原菌以凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌最多(12例),其次为金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌等。结论:本研究的结果表明,超声与PCR的结合显著提高了PJI的检测,特别是在标准PCR技术可能不足的情况下,例如在低级别慢性感染中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信