There Is a Difference in Patients' Opinions and Scientific Evidence Regarding Robot Assisted Total Joint Arthroplasty: a Questionnaire.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Kadir Uzel, Nesrullah Azboy, Kerem Edip Başarir, Alp Eren Kiliçkap, Süha Berkhan Bayin, Ibrahim Azboy
{"title":"There Is a Difference in Patients' Opinions and Scientific Evidence Regarding Robot Assisted Total Joint Arthroplasty: a Questionnaire.","authors":"Kadir Uzel, Nesrullah Azboy, Kerem Edip Başarir, Alp Eren Kiliçkap, Süha Berkhan Bayin, Ibrahim Azboy","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate patients' knowledge and opinions about robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In order to assess patients' knowledge and opinions about robotic THA and TKA surgery, a descriptive questionnaire consisting of a total of 17 questions assessing patients' demographic information (age, gender, education level, occupation, income level, marital status) and their knowledge and opinions about robotic surgery was designed and applied to 200 participants by face-to-face interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 62.6 ± 7.1 years (range: 43-82), with 53% female. Among participants, 39% were university graduates, 9% were healthcare professionals, and 61.5% had an income between 10,000-20,000 Turkish lira. 60% (n = 120) had information about robotic surgeries, primarily sourced from newspapers, TV (35%), and social media (33%). 68.3% believed robotic surgery positively impacts surgical outcomes, and 77.5% preferred robotic surgery for knee and hip procedures. Those informed via social media had a mean age of 57.6 ± 6.5 years, while those informed through patient recommendations had a mean age of 64.0 ± 6.9 years (p = 0.001). Higher education levels correlated with increased knowledge of robotic surgery (p = 0.001), as did private-sector employment and higher income (p = 0.001, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is an important step to understand the awareness and attitudes of robotic surgery among patients. There is a difference between the level of knowledge of the participants about robotic surgery and real scientific facts. Lack of knowledge and misconceptions about robotic surgery may affect patients' decision-making processes. Orthopaedic surgeons has responsibility to evaluate the new technological products in the light of strong scientific evidence when recommending to their patients. Also, media sources and social media platforms should maintain accurate information on emerging technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"92 4","pages":"218-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aimed to evaluate patients' knowledge and opinions about robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Material and methods: In order to assess patients' knowledge and opinions about robotic THA and TKA surgery, a descriptive questionnaire consisting of a total of 17 questions assessing patients' demographic information (age, gender, education level, occupation, income level, marital status) and their knowledge and opinions about robotic surgery was designed and applied to 200 participants by face-to-face interviews.

Results: The mean age of participants was 62.6 ± 7.1 years (range: 43-82), with 53% female. Among participants, 39% were university graduates, 9% were healthcare professionals, and 61.5% had an income between 10,000-20,000 Turkish lira. 60% (n = 120) had information about robotic surgeries, primarily sourced from newspapers, TV (35%), and social media (33%). 68.3% believed robotic surgery positively impacts surgical outcomes, and 77.5% preferred robotic surgery for knee and hip procedures. Those informed via social media had a mean age of 57.6 ± 6.5 years, while those informed through patient recommendations had a mean age of 64.0 ± 6.9 years (p = 0.001). Higher education levels correlated with increased knowledge of robotic surgery (p = 0.001), as did private-sector employment and higher income (p = 0.001, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: This study is an important step to understand the awareness and attitudes of robotic surgery among patients. There is a difference between the level of knowledge of the participants about robotic surgery and real scientific facts. Lack of knowledge and misconceptions about robotic surgery may affect patients' decision-making processes. Orthopaedic surgeons has responsibility to evaluate the new technological products in the light of strong scientific evidence when recommending to their patients. Also, media sources and social media platforms should maintain accurate information on emerging technologies.

关于机器人辅助全关节置换术患者意见和科学证据的差异:一份问卷。
研究目的:本研究旨在评估患者对机器人全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的知识和看法。材料与方法:为了评估患者对机器人全髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的知识和意见,设计了一份描述性问卷,共17个问题,评估患者的人口统计信息(年龄、性别、文化程度、职业、收入水平、婚姻状况)以及对机器人手术的知识和意见,并通过面对面访谈的方式对200名参与者进行了应用。结果:参与者平均年龄为62.6±7.1岁(43-82岁),女性占53%。在参与者中,39%是大学毕业生,9%是医疗保健专业人员,61.5%的收入在10,000-20,000土耳其里拉之间。60% (n = 120)的人有关于机器人手术的信息,主要来自报纸、电视(35%)和社交媒体(33%)。68.3%的人认为机器人手术对手术结果有积极影响,77.5%的人更喜欢机器人手术进行膝关节和髋关节手术。通过社交媒体告知的患者平均年龄为57.6±6.5岁,而通过患者推荐告知的患者平均年龄为64.0±6.9岁(p = 0.001)。高等教育水平与机器人手术知识的增加相关(p = 0.001),私营部门就业和高收入也是如此(p = 0.001, p = 0.001)。结论:本研究是了解患者对机器人手术认知和态度的重要一步。参与者对机器人手术的知识水平与真正的科学事实之间存在差异。对机器人手术缺乏了解和误解可能会影响患者的决策过程。骨科医生在向患者推荐新技术产品时,有责任根据强有力的科学证据评估新技术产品。此外,媒体来源和社交媒体平台应保持有关新兴技术的准确信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信