[Comparison of Abductor Muscle Strength and Harris Hip Score after Total Hip Arthroplasty].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
David Pařík, Michal Zídka
{"title":"[Comparison of Abductor Muscle Strength and Harris Hip Score after Total Hip Arthroplasty].","authors":"David Pařík, Michal Zídka","doi":"10.55095/achot2025/009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients with total hip arthroplasty performed through Watson-Jones anterolateral approach and Röttinger minimally invasive anterolateral approach (MIS-AL). The hypothesis was that the MIS-AL approach enables faster recovery and better clinical outcomes in terms of abductor muscle strength and Harris Hip Score (HHS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The prospective comparative study included 136 patients who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2021. In 88 patients the Watson-Jones procedure was performed and in 48 patients Röttinger minimally invasive procedure was opted for. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate the outcomes at three time points (before surgery, at 3 and 6 months after surgery) and the abductor muscle strength was measured using the dynamometer at four time points (before surgery, at 17 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery). The statistical analyses were conducted using the independent samples t-test at the level of significance p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the MIS-AL group, the HHS after 3 months was 86.32 ± 4.8 points, which was a higher score than that achieved in the Watson-Jones group (78.76 ± 5.6; p = 0.0015). After 6 months the difference remained in favour of MIS-AL (94.68 ± 4.7 vs. 90.28 ± 5.4; p = 0.0078). The maximum abductor muscle strength after 6 months improved from 125.52 ± 14.8 N to 170.91 ± 16.2 N in the Watson-Jones group and from 142.78 ± 15.3 N to168.11 ± 15.8 N in the MIS-AL group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results show that the differences in abductor muscle strength between the MIS-AL approach and the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach were statistically insignificant. However, better results of the Harris Hip Score in patients in whom the MIS-AL approach was used are supported by the trend of faster functional recovery and higher satisfaction rate of patients undergoing less invasive surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Röttinger minimally invasive anterolateral approach provides faster improvement of the HHS during the first six months after surgery. The differences in abductor muscle strength between the groups were statistically insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"92 3","pages":"174-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2025/009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients with total hip arthroplasty performed through Watson-Jones anterolateral approach and Röttinger minimally invasive anterolateral approach (MIS-AL). The hypothesis was that the MIS-AL approach enables faster recovery and better clinical outcomes in terms of abductor muscle strength and Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Material and methods: The prospective comparative study included 136 patients who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2021. In 88 patients the Watson-Jones procedure was performed and in 48 patients Röttinger minimally invasive procedure was opted for. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate the outcomes at three time points (before surgery, at 3 and 6 months after surgery) and the abductor muscle strength was measured using the dynamometer at four time points (before surgery, at 17 days, 3 and 6 months after surgery). The statistical analyses were conducted using the independent samples t-test at the level of significance p < 0.05.

Results: In the MIS-AL group, the HHS after 3 months was 86.32 ± 4.8 points, which was a higher score than that achieved in the Watson-Jones group (78.76 ± 5.6; p = 0.0015). After 6 months the difference remained in favour of MIS-AL (94.68 ± 4.7 vs. 90.28 ± 5.4; p = 0.0078). The maximum abductor muscle strength after 6 months improved from 125.52 ± 14.8 N to 170.91 ± 16.2 N in the Watson-Jones group and from 142.78 ± 15.3 N to168.11 ± 15.8 N in the MIS-AL group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Discussion: The results show that the differences in abductor muscle strength between the MIS-AL approach and the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach were statistically insignificant. However, better results of the Harris Hip Score in patients in whom the MIS-AL approach was used are supported by the trend of faster functional recovery and higher satisfaction rate of patients undergoing less invasive surgical procedures.

Conclusions: The Röttinger minimally invasive anterolateral approach provides faster improvement of the HHS during the first six months after surgery. The differences in abductor muscle strength between the groups were statistically insignificant.

全髋关节置换术后外展肌力量与Harris髋关节评分的比较。
研究目的:本研究旨在比较经Watson-Jones前外侧入路和Röttinger微创前外侧入路(MIS-AL)行全髋关节置换术患者的术后效果。假设MIS-AL方法能够在外展肌力量和Harris髋关节评分(HHS)方面实现更快的恢复和更好的临床结果。材料和方法:前瞻性比较研究包括2018年至2021年期间接受手术的136例患者。88例患者采用沃森-琼斯手术,48例患者采用Röttinger微创手术。Harris髋关节评分(HHS)用于评估三个时间点(术前、术后3个月和6个月)的结果,并在四个时间点(术前、术后17天、术后3个月和6个月)使用测功机测量外展肌力量。统计学分析采用独立样本t检验,显著性水平p < 0.05。结果:misal组3个月后HHS评分为86.32±4.8分,高于Watson-Jones组(78.76±5.6分;p = 0.0015)。6个月后,MIS-AL的差异仍然存在(94.68±4.7 vs 90.28±5.4;p = 0.0078)。Watson-Jones组6个月后最大外展肌力量由125.52±14.8 N提高到170.91±16.2 N, misal组由142.78±15.3 N提高到168.11±15.8 N,两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。讨论:结果显示misal入路和Watson-Jones前外侧入路外展肌力量的差异在统计学上不显著。然而,Harris髋关节评分在采用MIS-AL入路的患者中取得了更好的结果,这是由于患者在进行微创手术时功能恢复更快,满意度更高的趋势所支持的。结论:Röttinger微创前外侧入路在术后6个月内改善HHS更快。两组间外展肌力量差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信