Evaluation of Preservation and Extraction Methods on eDNA Yield and Detection Probability After Long-Term Storage.

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Sarah A Tomke, Ethan N Buland, Steven J Price
{"title":"Evaluation of Preservation and Extraction Methods on eDNA Yield and Detection Probability After Long-Term Storage.","authors":"Sarah A Tomke, Ethan N Buland, Steven J Price","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing best practices for the overall workflow of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is necessary to increase reproducibility and precision in estimates of biodiversity across studies. Rigorous comparisons between eDNA sample preservation strategies for long-term storage durations are lacking, and previous studies have primarily evaluated DNA yield rather than detection success, despite detection being of critical importance when studying rare or elusive species. Here, we assessed the efficacy of common preservation media, storage temperatures and DNA extraction methods on eDNA yield and detection probability after one- and four-years of storage. We found that frozen and ethanol-preserved filters had significantly higher DNA concentrations and detection rates than samples preserved in Longmire's lysis buffer when DNA extraction methods differed among the treatment groups. Substantial inhibition was observed in the Longmire's samples when using a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (PCI) extraction method, but did not occur when Longmire's samples were extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. PCI extraction also caused reduced yield and detection rates in ethanol-preserved samples, demonstrating its relative inefficiency for eDNA recovery. eDNA yield and detection rates were highly stable over one- and four-years of storage for all preservation strategies except for ethanol samples stored at room temperature, in which concentrations, but not detection rates, declined significantly after 4 years. Overall, frozen and Longmire's preserved samples had higher yield than ethanol-preserved samples, although detections were high across all media. Our study contributes valuable information towards the optimisation and standardisation of long-term storage protocols of filtered eDNA samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":" ","pages":"e70035"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing best practices for the overall workflow of environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is necessary to increase reproducibility and precision in estimates of biodiversity across studies. Rigorous comparisons between eDNA sample preservation strategies for long-term storage durations are lacking, and previous studies have primarily evaluated DNA yield rather than detection success, despite detection being of critical importance when studying rare or elusive species. Here, we assessed the efficacy of common preservation media, storage temperatures and DNA extraction methods on eDNA yield and detection probability after one- and four-years of storage. We found that frozen and ethanol-preserved filters had significantly higher DNA concentrations and detection rates than samples preserved in Longmire's lysis buffer when DNA extraction methods differed among the treatment groups. Substantial inhibition was observed in the Longmire's samples when using a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (PCI) extraction method, but did not occur when Longmire's samples were extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. PCI extraction also caused reduced yield and detection rates in ethanol-preserved samples, demonstrating its relative inefficiency for eDNA recovery. eDNA yield and detection rates were highly stable over one- and four-years of storage for all preservation strategies except for ethanol samples stored at room temperature, in which concentrations, but not detection rates, declined significantly after 4 years. Overall, frozen and Longmire's preserved samples had higher yield than ethanol-preserved samples, although detections were high across all media. Our study contributes valuable information towards the optimisation and standardisation of long-term storage protocols of filtered eDNA samples.

保存和提取方法对长期保存后eDNA产率和检测概率的评价。
建立环境DNA (eDNA)采样总体工作流程的最佳实践对于提高研究生物多样性估计的可重复性和准确性是必要的。缺乏对eDNA样本长期保存策略的严格比较,并且先前的研究主要评估DNA产量而不是检测成功率,尽管检测在研究稀有或难以捉摸的物种时至关重要。在这里,我们评估了常见的保存介质、储存温度和DNA提取方法对保存1年和4年后eDNA产量和检测概率的影响。我们发现,当不同处理组的DNA提取方法不同时,冷冻和乙醇保存过滤器的DNA浓度和检出率明显高于保存在Longmire裂解缓冲液中的样品。当使用苯酚-氯仿-异戊醇(PCI)提取方法时,在Longmire的样本中观察到明显的抑制作用,但当使用Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit提取Longmire的样本时,没有出现这种抑制作用。PCI提取也导致乙醇保存样品的产率和检出率降低,表明其对eDNA的回收效率相对较低。除了室温下保存的乙醇样品外,所有保存策略的eDNA产量和检出率在1年和4年内都高度稳定,室温下保存的乙醇样品的浓度在4年后显著下降,但检出率没有显著下降。总的来说,冷冻和朗迈尔保存的样品比乙醇保存的样品产量更高,尽管在所有介质中检测都很高。我们的研究为筛选后的eDNA样本的长期储存方案的优化和标准化提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信