{"title":"Colchicine and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with gout and Type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Minjeong Jeon, Yongtai Cho, Sungho Bea, Wonkyoung You, Sung Kweon Cho, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Ju-Young Shin","doi":"10.1111/joim.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gout are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Despite the approval for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2023, evidence regarding the effectiveness of colchicine among T2DM population remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the association between the use of colchicine and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with gout and T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide, population-based cohort study with active comparator, new-user design using nationwide claims data of South Korea (2010-2022). Patients with T2DM and gout who initiated colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from 2011 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was MACE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were each individual components of primary outcome and hospitalization due to heart failure. As-treated approach with 30-day grace period was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before propensity score (PS) matching, 13,019 colchicine users and 111,594 NSAIDs users were included in the study cohort (mean age, 65.5 vs. 62.9; 35.0% vs. 29.8% female). After 1:2 PS matching, 12,908 colchicine users and 25,816 NSAIDs users remained (mean age, 65.7 vs. 65.7 years; 35.2% vs. 35.1% female). The PS-matched hazard ratio for MACE was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.65-1.36), and all secondary outcomes also resulted in null findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of colchicine does not significantly reduce the risk of MACE compared with NSAIDs in a real-world population with T2DM and gout in South Korea between 2011 and 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gout are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Despite the approval for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2023, evidence regarding the effectiveness of colchicine among T2DM population remains limited.
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the association between the use of colchicine and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with gout and T2DM.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide, population-based cohort study with active comparator, new-user design using nationwide claims data of South Korea (2010-2022). Patients with T2DM and gout who initiated colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from 2011 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was MACE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were each individual components of primary outcome and hospitalization due to heart failure. As-treated approach with 30-day grace period was applied.
Results: Before propensity score (PS) matching, 13,019 colchicine users and 111,594 NSAIDs users were included in the study cohort (mean age, 65.5 vs. 62.9; 35.0% vs. 29.8% female). After 1:2 PS matching, 12,908 colchicine users and 25,816 NSAIDs users remained (mean age, 65.7 vs. 65.7 years; 35.2% vs. 35.1% female). The PS-matched hazard ratio for MACE was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.65-1.36), and all secondary outcomes also resulted in null findings.
Conclusions: Use of colchicine does not significantly reduce the risk of MACE compared with NSAIDs in a real-world population with T2DM and gout in South Korea between 2011 and 2022.
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)和痛风与心血管事件风险增加相关。尽管美国食品和药物管理局于2023年批准秋水仙碱作为心血管疾病的二级预防,但关于秋水仙碱在2型糖尿病人群中的有效性的证据仍然有限。目的:我们旨在评估秋水仙碱的使用与痛风和T2DM患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险之间的关系。方法:我们使用韩国2010-2022年的全国索赔数据进行了一项全国性的、基于人群的队列研究,采用了积极的比较者和新用户设计。纳入了2011年至2022年期间开始使用秋水仙碱或非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的T2DM和痛风患者。主要终点是MACE(心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和心血管死亡)。次要结局是主要结局和因心力衰竭住院的每个单独组成部分。采用30天宽限期的as - treating方法。结果:在倾向评分(PS)匹配前,13019名秋水仙碱使用者和111594名非甾体抗炎药使用者被纳入研究队列(平均年龄,65.5 vs 62.9;女性35.0% vs 29.8%)。1:2 PS匹配后,仍有12908名秋水仙碱使用者和25816名非甾体抗炎药使用者(平均年龄65.7岁vs 65.7岁;女性35.2% vs 35.1%)。MACE的ps匹配风险比为0.94(95%可信区间为0.65-1.36),所有次要结局也均为零发现。结论:与非甾体抗炎药相比,在2011年至2022年的韩国T2DM和痛风人群中,秋水仙碱的使用并没有显著降低MACE的风险。
期刊介绍:
JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.