Sharan R Srinivasan, Amy D Mook, Michelle Rochman, Jin Yun Helen Chen, Weiyi Mu, George R Wilmot, Liana S Rosenthal, Wendy R Uhlmann
{"title":"Practice Recommendations for Genetic Testing of Ataxias.","authors":"Sharan R Srinivasan, Amy D Mook, Michelle Rochman, Jin Yun Helen Chen, Weiyi Mu, George R Wilmot, Liana S Rosenthal, Wendy R Uhlmann","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Over the past decade, significant advances in genetic testing for ataxia have improved diagnostic accuracy, informed clinical trial eligibility, guided treatment decisions, and enabled cascade testing of at-risk relatives. While guidance exists for other neurogenetic conditions, there are no standardized guidelines on genetic counseling and testing for individuals with unexplained ataxia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature review on genetic counseling and testing in ataxia, identifying 7362 articles. After removing 2971 duplicates, 4391 articles were screened by two authors using the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) framework. In areas lacking clear published evidence, we convened a multidisciplinary expert panel with clinical and genetic expertise in ataxia. Following conflict resolution and additional filtering, 68 articles were included in our guidance development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on this evidence and expert consensus, we developed 20 recommendations addressing indications for genetic testing in hereditary ataxia, components of pre- and post-test counseling, testing options, insurance considerations, interpretation of test results, and appropriate referral to genetic counseling services. Major themes include the importance of formal genetic counseling and suggesting whole genome sequencing as first-line testing, with an emphasis on detecting repeat expansions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These evidence-based, consensus-driven recommendations aim to support clinicians in evaluating patients with unexplained ataxia in order to provide timely evaluation and care, both for patients and their at-risk relatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Over the past decade, significant advances in genetic testing for ataxia have improved diagnostic accuracy, informed clinical trial eligibility, guided treatment decisions, and enabled cascade testing of at-risk relatives. While guidance exists for other neurogenetic conditions, there are no standardized guidelines on genetic counseling and testing for individuals with unexplained ataxia.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review on genetic counseling and testing in ataxia, identifying 7362 articles. After removing 2971 duplicates, 4391 articles were screened by two authors using the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) framework. In areas lacking clear published evidence, we convened a multidisciplinary expert panel with clinical and genetic expertise in ataxia. Following conflict resolution and additional filtering, 68 articles were included in our guidance development.
Results: Based on this evidence and expert consensus, we developed 20 recommendations addressing indications for genetic testing in hereditary ataxia, components of pre- and post-test counseling, testing options, insurance considerations, interpretation of test results, and appropriate referral to genetic counseling services. Major themes include the importance of formal genetic counseling and suggesting whole genome sequencing as first-line testing, with an emphasis on detecting repeat expansions.
Conclusion: These evidence-based, consensus-driven recommendations aim to support clinicians in evaluating patients with unexplained ataxia in order to provide timely evaluation and care, both for patients and their at-risk relatives.
目的:在过去的十年中,共济失调基因检测的重大进展提高了诊断准确性,为临床试验资格提供了信息,指导了治疗决策,并使高危亲属的级联检测成为可能。虽然存在针对其他神经遗传疾病的指导,但对于不明原因的共济失调患者的遗传咨询和测试尚无标准化的指导方针。方法:我们对有关共济失调遗传咨询和检测的文献进行了全面的综述,筛选出7362篇文献。在剔除2971个重复后,两位作者使用基因组应用评估(Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention, EGAPP)框架筛选了4391篇文章。在缺乏明确公开证据的领域,我们召集了一个多学科专家小组,其中包括共济失调的临床和遗传专业知识。在冲突解决和附加过滤之后,我们的指南开发中包含了68篇文章。结果:基于这些证据和专家共识,我们提出了20项建议,涉及遗传性共济失调基因检测的适应症、检测前和检测后咨询的组成部分、检测选择、保险考虑、检测结果的解释以及适当的遗传咨询服务转诊。主要主题包括正式遗传咨询的重要性,建议全基因组测序作为一线检测,重点是检测重复扩增。结论:这些循证、共识驱动的建议旨在支持临床医生评估不明原因性共济失调患者,以便为患者及其高危亲属提供及时的评估和护理。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.