X-ray multimeter performance under calibration laboratory conditions

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1002/mp.18106
John T. Stasko, Wesley S. Culberson
{"title":"X-ray multimeter performance under calibration laboratory conditions","authors":"John T. Stasko,&nbsp;Wesley S. Culberson","doi":"10.1002/mp.18106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Estimating dose delivered to patients for a typical mammographic or radiologic examination requires accurate knowledge of several beam quantities. X-ray multimeters (XMMs) are compact, solid-state semiconductor dosimeters that have become common for conventional QA measurements due to their ease of use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>In this investigation, the performance of two XMMs in low-energy x-ray calibration beams was assessed, and the stability of the manufacturer's calibration over time was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An RTI Piranha and Radcal Accu-Gold+ with AGMS-DM+ sensor were used to measure air-kerma rates and half-value layers of UW-MO and UW-M series calibration beams. Measurement results were compared to reference values collected with standard instruments. The same measurements were repeated every 3–5 months for 2.5 years to evaluate whether the XMMs’ energy response changes over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All air-kerma rate measurements and nearly all half-value layer measurements were within tolerance of the reference measurements. Both XMMs were satisfactorily stable over the course of the study, with all measured air-kerma rates within a 2% range relative to the reference for a specific beam. However, some drift in response was observed, particularly for the RTI Piranha.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both XMMs met the performance standards provided by their respective manufacturers. An additional calibration would result in increased measurement accuracy for some beam series. One limitation of this study is that the detectors were not subject to more rigorous clinical conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.18106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Estimating dose delivered to patients for a typical mammographic or radiologic examination requires accurate knowledge of several beam quantities. X-ray multimeters (XMMs) are compact, solid-state semiconductor dosimeters that have become common for conventional QA measurements due to their ease of use.

Purpose

In this investigation, the performance of two XMMs in low-energy x-ray calibration beams was assessed, and the stability of the manufacturer's calibration over time was evaluated.

Methods

An RTI Piranha and Radcal Accu-Gold+ with AGMS-DM+ sensor were used to measure air-kerma rates and half-value layers of UW-MO and UW-M series calibration beams. Measurement results were compared to reference values collected with standard instruments. The same measurements were repeated every 3–5 months for 2.5 years to evaluate whether the XMMs’ energy response changes over time.

Results

All air-kerma rate measurements and nearly all half-value layer measurements were within tolerance of the reference measurements. Both XMMs were satisfactorily stable over the course of the study, with all measured air-kerma rates within a 2% range relative to the reference for a specific beam. However, some drift in response was observed, particularly for the RTI Piranha.

Conclusions

Both XMMs met the performance standards provided by their respective manufacturers. An additional calibration would result in increased measurement accuracy for some beam series. One limitation of this study is that the detectors were not subject to more rigorous clinical conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

x射线万用表在校准实验室条件下的性能
背景:在典型的乳房x线摄影或放射学检查中,估计给患者的剂量需要对几种光束量有准确的了解。x射线万用表(xmm)是一种紧凑的固态半导体剂量计,由于其易于使用,已成为传统QA测量中常见的剂量计。在本研究中,评估了两种xmm在低能x射线校准光束中的性能,并评估了制造商校准随时间的稳定性。方法采用RTI Piranha和Radcal Accu-Gold+与AGMS-DM+传感器分别测量UW-MO和UW-M系列校准光束的空气速率和半值层数。测量结果与标准仪器采集的参考值进行比较。同样的测量每3-5个月重复一次,持续2.5年,以评估xmm的能量响应是否随时间变化。结果所有的气孔率测量值和几乎所有的半值层测量值都在参考测量值的公差范围内。在整个研究过程中,两种xmm都表现出令人满意的稳定性,相对于特定光束的参考,所有测量的空气kerma率都在2%的范围内。然而,观察到一些反应的漂移,特别是RTI食人鱼。结论两种xmm均符合各自生产厂家提供的性能标准。额外的校准将导致某些光束系列的测量精度提高。这项研究的一个限制是,探测器不受更严格的临床条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信