The Impact of Interim Care Plans for Direct Inpatient Admissions on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Retrospective Single-Site Matched-Cohort Study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Henry Tsao, Adam Cureton, Rory Thompson, Claire Merry, Dale Ramdath, Sanjaya Herath, Philip Jones, Edward Pink, John Sutherland
{"title":"The Impact of Interim Care Plans for Direct Inpatient Admissions on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Retrospective Single-Site Matched-Cohort Study","authors":"Henry Tsao,&nbsp;Adam Cureton,&nbsp;Rory Thompson,&nbsp;Claire Merry,&nbsp;Dale Ramdath,&nbsp;Sanjaya Herath,&nbsp;Philip Jones,&nbsp;Edward Pink,&nbsp;John Sutherland","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Investigate the effect of interim care plans (ICP) for direct inpatient general medical and cardiology admissions on Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS), and whether ICP were associated with adverse patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single-site retrospective study across 12 months in 2023, where ICP was implemented from 1st January. Adults presenting to ED and admitted under general medicine or cardiology, but not requiring high dependency unit care, were included. Patients admitted under ICP (ICP group) were matched to those admitted without ICP (NO-ICP group) via variable ratio up to 1:4 (ICP:NO-ICP) based on age (±10 years), sex, date of presentation (±7 days) and presentation time (day, evening or night). Patients in the NO-ICP group were excluded if vital signs at the time of triage or referral did not fulfil the ICP criteria. The primary outcome was ED LOS, with secondary outcomes including time to inpatient referral, time to bed booking, hospital LOS, and Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls within 24 h after referral.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ICP facilitated admissions were associated with shorter ED LOS compared with admissions without ICP (ICP 535.16 [342.28–728.03] min (median [interquartile range]); NO-ICP 995.00 [642.49–1347.51] min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, there was no difference in total hospital LOS (<i>p</i> = 0.28) or rate of adverse events between ICP and NO-ICP groups (Odds ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.24–2.21).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This single-site study suggests that the ICP model of care for direct inpatient admissions was associated with reduced ED LOS, without increasing adverse outcomes for patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Investigate the effect of interim care plans (ICP) for direct inpatient general medical and cardiology admissions on Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS), and whether ICP were associated with adverse patient outcomes.

Methods

This was a single-site retrospective study across 12 months in 2023, where ICP was implemented from 1st January. Adults presenting to ED and admitted under general medicine or cardiology, but not requiring high dependency unit care, were included. Patients admitted under ICP (ICP group) were matched to those admitted without ICP (NO-ICP group) via variable ratio up to 1:4 (ICP:NO-ICP) based on age (±10 years), sex, date of presentation (±7 days) and presentation time (day, evening or night). Patients in the NO-ICP group were excluded if vital signs at the time of triage or referral did not fulfil the ICP criteria. The primary outcome was ED LOS, with secondary outcomes including time to inpatient referral, time to bed booking, hospital LOS, and Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls within 24 h after referral.

Results

ICP facilitated admissions were associated with shorter ED LOS compared with admissions without ICP (ICP 535.16 [342.28–728.03] min (median [interquartile range]); NO-ICP 995.00 [642.49–1347.51] min, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in total hospital LOS (p = 0.28) or rate of adverse events between ICP and NO-ICP groups (Odds ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.24–2.21).

Conclusion

This single-site study suggests that the ICP model of care for direct inpatient admissions was associated with reduced ED LOS, without increasing adverse outcomes for patients.

直接住院病人的临时护理计划对急诊科住院时间的影响:一项回顾性单点匹配队列研究
目的探讨普通内科和心内科直接住院患者的临时护理计划(ICP)对急诊科(ED)住院时间(LOS)的影响,以及ICP是否与患者不良预后相关。方法:本研究为单点回顾性研究,于2023年1月1日起实施ICP。在普通内科或心脏病科就诊,但不需要高依赖单元护理的成年人也包括在内。根据年龄(±10岁)、性别、就诊日期(±7天)和就诊时间(白天、晚上或晚上),以1:4 (ICP:NO-ICP)的可变比例对有ICP患者(ICP组)和无ICP患者进行匹配。如果在分诊或转诊时生命体征不符合ICP标准,则排除无ICP组患者。主要终点是急诊科的住院时间,次要终点包括转诊住院时间、预约床位时间、医院住院时间和转诊后24小时内医疗急救小组(MET)的电话。结果:与非ICP患者相比,ICP促进患者入院时ED LOS较短(ICP 535.16 [342.28-728.03] min(中位数[四分位数间距]);NO-ICP 995.00 [642.49-1347.51] min, p < 0.001)。然而,在医院总LOS (p = 0.28)和不良事件发生率方面,ICP组和no -ICP组没有差异(优势比0.73;95%可信区间0.24-2.21)。结论:这项单点研究表明,直接住院患者的ICP治疗模式与降低ED LOS有关,而不会增加患者的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信