{"title":"Enhancing patient-specific quality assurance in MR-guided radiation therapy: A fluence-based method using log files","authors":"Kai Yuan, Matthew Man-hin Cheung, Louis Lee","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is crucial in radiation therapy to ensure accurate and safe dose delivery. The Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, which combines MRI with a linear accelerator, presents unique challenges for conventional PSQA methods due to its adaptive capabilities and the presence of a magnetic field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study introduced a novel PSQA method for the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, utilizing treatment log files and fluence map verification to provide a more efficient alternative to traditional measurement-based techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed method analyzed log file data, including monitor units (MU), multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions, and jaw positions, comparing them with treatment planning system (TPS) values. Fluence maps were generated for each gantry angle and evaluated using gamma analysis. A user-friendly interface was developed to streamline the process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The method was tested on nine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases, showing strong concordance between planned and delivered parameters. MU deviations were within 0.5 MU, X-jaw and MLC leaf position deviations were under 1 mm, and gamma analysis of fluence maps achieved passing rates above 98% for all gantry angles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This log file-based PSQA method offered distinct advantages over traditional measurement-based approaches, including reduced QA time, direct assessment of the delivered plan, and comprehensive evaluation of treatment parameters. This method provided an efficient and accurate alternative PSQA solution for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is crucial in radiation therapy to ensure accurate and safe dose delivery. The Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, which combines MRI with a linear accelerator, presents unique challenges for conventional PSQA methods due to its adaptive capabilities and the presence of a magnetic field.
Purpose
This study introduced a novel PSQA method for the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, utilizing treatment log files and fluence map verification to provide a more efficient alternative to traditional measurement-based techniques.
Methods
The proposed method analyzed log file data, including monitor units (MU), multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions, and jaw positions, comparing them with treatment planning system (TPS) values. Fluence maps were generated for each gantry angle and evaluated using gamma analysis. A user-friendly interface was developed to streamline the process.
Results
The method was tested on nine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) cases, showing strong concordance between planned and delivered parameters. MU deviations were within 0.5 MU, X-jaw and MLC leaf position deviations were under 1 mm, and gamma analysis of fluence maps achieved passing rates above 98% for all gantry angles.
Conclusion
This log file-based PSQA method offered distinct advantages over traditional measurement-based approaches, including reduced QA time, direct assessment of the delivered plan, and comprehensive evaluation of treatment parameters. This method provided an efficient and accurate alternative PSQA solution for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic