Efficient MLC quality assurance using a virtual picket fence test in an MR-Linac

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kai Yuan, Matthew Manhin Cheung, Louis Lee
{"title":"Efficient MLC quality assurance using a virtual picket fence test in an MR-Linac","authors":"Kai Yuan,&nbsp;Matthew Manhin Cheung,&nbsp;Louis Lee","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Elekta Unity MR-Linac system integrates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a linear accelerator (Linac) for adaptive radiation therapy. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods for multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) face challenges in this system due to the magnetic field and limited field size of electronic portal imaging devices (EPID).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to develop a ‘virtual picket fence’ test using machine log files to evaluate MLC performance in the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, providing a more efficient and comprehensive QA method that overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A picket fence test plan with 11 segments was delivered on the Elekta Unity system. Maximum absolute error and root mean square (RMS) error for each leaf were calculated by comparing log file data with nominal values. A deliberate 1 mm error was introduced in selected MLCs to test the sensitivity of the virtual test. The results from the log file were further compared with measurements from radiochromic films.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The maximum deviation between log file data and nominal values was within 1 mm for all leaves. The virtual picket fence test successfully identified MLCs with deviations beyond the 0.5 mm warning threshold in the error-introduced test. Comparisons with film-based measurements showed good agreement, with deviations between film and log file data also within 1 mm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The virtual picket fence test provides an efficient and comprehensive method for MLC QA in the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system. This method can be integrated into weekly QA workflows alongside traditional film-based methods for thorough quality control.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70232","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Elekta Unity MR-Linac system integrates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a linear accelerator (Linac) for adaptive radiation therapy. Traditional quality assurance (QA) methods for multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) face challenges in this system due to the magnetic field and limited field size of electronic portal imaging devices (EPID).

Purpose

This study aims to develop a ‘virtual picket fence’ test using machine log files to evaluate MLC performance in the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system, providing a more efficient and comprehensive QA method that overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches.

Methods

A picket fence test plan with 11 segments was delivered on the Elekta Unity system. Maximum absolute error and root mean square (RMS) error for each leaf were calculated by comparing log file data with nominal values. A deliberate 1 mm error was introduced in selected MLCs to test the sensitivity of the virtual test. The results from the log file were further compared with measurements from radiochromic films.

Results

The maximum deviation between log file data and nominal values was within 1 mm for all leaves. The virtual picket fence test successfully identified MLCs with deviations beyond the 0.5 mm warning threshold in the error-introduced test. Comparisons with film-based measurements showed good agreement, with deviations between film and log file data also within 1 mm.

Conclusions

The virtual picket fence test provides an efficient and comprehensive method for MLC QA in the Elekta Unity MR-Linac system. This method can be integrated into weekly QA workflows alongside traditional film-based methods for thorough quality control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有效的MLC质量保证使用虚拟尖桩栅栏测试在MR-Linac
Elekta Unity MR-Linac系统将磁共振成像(MRI)与线性加速器(Linac)集成在一起,用于适应性放射治疗。传统的多叶准直器质量保证方法在多叶准直器系统中由于电子门静脉成像装置(EPID)的磁场和有限的场尺寸而面临挑战。本研究旨在开发一种“虚拟尖桩栅栏”测试,使用机器日志文件来评估Elekta Unity MR-Linac系统中的MLC性能,提供一种更有效和全面的QA方法,克服传统方法的局限性。方法在Elekta Unity系统上制作11段尖桩围栏试验方案。通过将日志文件数据与标称值进行比较,计算每个叶片的最大绝对误差和均方根误差。在选定的MLCs中故意引入1 mm误差来测试虚拟测试的灵敏度。日志文件的结果进一步与放射变色胶片的测量结果进行了比较。结果所有叶片的日志数据与标称值的最大偏差在1mm以内。虚拟尖桩栅栏测试成功地识别出误差引入测试中偏差超过0.5 mm警告阈值的MLCs。与基于胶片的测量结果的比较显示出良好的一致性,胶片和日志文件数据之间的偏差也在1毫米以内。结论虚拟尖桩栅栏试验为Elekta Unity MR-Linac系统的MLC质量评价提供了一种高效、全面的方法。这种方法可以与传统的基于胶片的方法一起集成到每周的QA工作流程中,以进行彻底的质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信